Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Cleaning Out My SubJournal

My Subjournal is full...
and i've already gotten a new one...
But i need to 'Save' some dregs from the old one before i transfer it to... ( ??? )

- - - -
Why Not?
( i'm sure !!! ??? i already did a blogpage on this, but i can't find it...??? )

  1. Full Character Access on Computers
  2. Instant Start Up
  3. Robot Bank Robberies
  4. Call in Bank Robberies
  5. Heretical T.V.
  6. More Sensible Assassinations
  7. AI
  8. Really viable robot pets
  9. Commercial Submarines
  10. Custom Cars
  11. Freedom of Fashion
  12. Ugly People revolt.
  13. Animals with Infered Vision
  14. Why do Smart People let the dumb people run the world.
  15. Super Crimminals ( Artists as Crimminals )
  16. Jedi-Knight / Templar / Samuri's...
  17. Teaching of Stupid Science
  18. Recognition of heretical Science
  19. Colonize the moon
  20. Bad Space program / looking for life on Mars
  21. Homelessness
  22. War on Terror
  23. Lack of a Free Press
  24. Obvious Untruths
  25. Masturbating in Public...
    Sure it might be rude, like spitting... But why is it Illegal...?

- - - - - -
Psychological Test
- - - - -

ScreenSaver Universe

  1. SaberToothed Animals
  2. Giantism is various animals
  3. Gratuitious evolution of unnecessary features
  4. Best Proof- All the things that should be happening, but aren't
  5. Golden Ratio Variance...
    And other significant proportions...
  6. Just So Falacy explanations for 'x'
  7. Magick as violations of 'Natural Law'
  8. Along with The Other 'Just So' attributes that contribute to life being possible, what is the allowed variance of 'Water to Land'...?
    If a planet had too much water, fire using animals couldn't evolve, but too little would mean that life might never get started...?
- - - - -

How do they Know that...?

  1. E=MC^2
    Where did the C come from...?
    That's always looked very suspicous to me...!
  2. How far away is the Sun?
  3. How big is Jupiter?
  4. What is Entanglement?
    It seems to me that if, under the conditions usually attributed to Entangled particles... Everything would be Entangled with Everything else...???
  5. What is a Magnetic Field?
  6. What are the chances of a photon dropping INTO the Zero point background energy reserve...?
  7. That the calculations for pi, are really pi?
  8. Cobe results were the result of the 3 degrees of background radiation...?
    It always looked to me that the pictures looked just like what i would have expected from a steady state universe...?!

- - - - -

What if someone visited the future
and it contained innumerable 'Things' ( transport devices, off path zones, devices... ) that were made up of 'Forms' that the visitor could not see...! His brain, as an infant, was never exposed to these 'shapes' and thus, as an adult, could not see them...!
( tests with kittens seem to bear this out...! )
In the visitors brain, these unusual shapes are processed as 'Regular' forms up to the point where the brain tries to find an example, or previous reference to the 'regular, Non-amorphous, structured form... So that it's not classified as a previously known form, nor does it qualify as a unclassified shape, such as a puddle or cloud... These shapes pass all the tests for 'real shapes' but there just aren't any examples of them for the brain to 'See'...
These shapes would 'fall between' the cracks of things like Cirlces and Squares... Not one, not the other, and not exactly an amalgum of both either...!!!
- - - -
Experiment to Prove Reincarnation

  1. Select a large number of city birds ( people would most likely choose to reincarnate into a bird that is going to live in a familiar environment, IF they chose to reincarnate into a bird at all...!!! ( Some may chose Romatic Birds... But this sampling may prove sufficient ) -- Presumably )
  2. Assume that only a small number of these birds are from Humanimal Reincarnations, and that furthermore, the humanimals that they previously came from, were from a 'Western' Civilization.
  3. Fabricate a gizmo that will display or present combinations of 2 sets of 2 objects ( 4 objects in all - per trial run ) such that one set is obviously related to one another, such as butter and toast, But in a way that a non-human would not immediately 'see'...
    And the other set would not be obviously related...
    ( Someone very clever may be able to find a link between them, but it would not be 'Obvious' ) -- Such as a Ring of Keys and a Tampon.
  4. Assume that only a human mind can discern that the related pair of objects are related.
  5. And that the bird can then choose that set, and recieve a small, encouraging reward.
  6. If a statistically large number of birds-- OR one or two birds can consistently chose the related pairs, then the simplest explanation is that they are humanimal minds currently inhabiting bird forms.
- - - -

  1. War
  2. Menstual Blood
  3. Sun
  4. Moon
  5. Jealousy
  6. Litter Free Neighborhoods
  7. Ruined Cars
  8. Mail Boxes
  9. Ugly Women
  10. Smokers
  11. Buckets
  12. Genitial Mutilation
  13. Shopping Malls
  14. Important Hat
  15. Things Painted with Flags, Eagles, Political Animals
  16. Arrows
  17. Lines on Roads
  18. Wallet
  19. Large Marked Bags
  20. Masturbating on a Bus, in a closet...
  21. Closets full of broken toys
  22. Shorts
  23. Genitals showing through
  24. Filthy hands / face / neck
  25. sores
  26. rolls of fat
  27. patchy grass
  28. gaurd rails
  29. laws
  30. lies
  31. riding animals
  32. private spots
  33. swimsuit area
  34. mice
  35. neon green signs
  36. pets for children, drunks, lonely housewives
  37. difficult puzzles
  38. windows
  39. polygons
  40. foreign facial features
  41. flow charts
  42. street lights
  43. street signs
  44. yard sale
  45. buildings as churches
  46. bleeding
  47. ink
  48. the differenc shapes of leafs, clouds
  49. mathematical variations
  50. underwear as a
  51. set theory
  52. Suzies tangerine eyebrow pencil
  53. The Picture of Everyone
    This idea is that you can make a picture that is so ambiguous that it looks like anyone
  54. Confusion...
  55. and so on...
- - - - - - -

The Gullible Skeptic
The gullible skeptic is someone, that for whatever reasons, chooses ( if this is the right word ) to agree with whatever the broken scientists ( pathalogical skeptics / current orthodoxy ) says is true.

- - - -
And lots more...
to boring to transcribe

No comments: