Thursday, July 09, 2009

99.97% of The CENSORED Fiasco

Prologue:
This Issue seemed clear enough to me at one point,
Then became terribly Ambiguous,
Then my beliefs Clarified a Bit...
Then Became Confused Again...
And Now: ( ? )
i am content that i Understand The Spirit of
The Creative Commons Licensing Agreement.
So This Rant tends to Wander Aimlessly,
Particularly Where i'm Commenting...!
When i start Typing, i just keep Typing—
Whether i have Clarity of Intent or Not... ( ! )

:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:

For some time now;
i have very much enjoyed taking other people's pictures from Flickr
And Reworked them into Something A Little Different—
As Collages,
[ A Repository of Them May be Found Here, Here or Here ]
And Usually; The Response is Favorable,
Or Benignly Indifferent—
Until Just Recently.

./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\./*\.

What a Nuisance & Distraction this has been for me.

Plus: It came to A Head at the beginning of The Independence Day Weekend;
And since i don't have an InterWeb Connection at Home ( ??? ! )
i had to wait until Monday until i could follow up on what was happening!

)) ugh. ((

On Monday;
Rather by Accident— i discovered The PunchLine to This Fiasco,
And i am torn between just telling you what this is,
Or letting you Figure It Out on your Own.
But since there isn't an accumulation of Clues that lead up to it,
Just The Contingency of One Improbable Discovery that Revealed it...
i will tell it to you now.

It turns out—
That it wasn't a small number of people that was causing all this trouble—

It was Just One person with several Flickr Accounts ( ! )

This one person was Unambiguously Harassing me,
And Since— Because of This Harassment;
i have learned more & more about
The Creative Commons Licensing Agreement—

i had never really given much consideration
To The CC Agreements before this;
And i Now Know that i was Standing on Very Firm Legal Ground
If i had Only taken The Position
Of just ignoring these Lunatics from The Very Beginning ( !! )

When you put a Attribution Creative Commons Licensing Agreement
On One of Your Pictures...
You Completely Lose Control of What May Become of it...
With The Very Thin Exception(s That;
If The Derivation that is Produced,
Actually Breaks The Law;
By meeting The Regional Standards of Pornography— ( et. al. )
Or Secondly: --( Maybe )--
...If you could Show That The Image; or Other Work,
Were to So Severely A Breach of The Public Standards of Common Decency
That you could Seek Legal Redress...

The Rules as Defined by The People that Created The Idea of
The Creative Commons Licensing Agreements,
Clearly Intended to Make a Delineation Between Derivations
That were Simply Disagreeable to The Creator of The Original Source Material,
And Derivations that were Illegal or Represented
A Derogatory/Slanderous/Harmful Treatment of The Licensor's Work.
My Dictionary describes Derogatory as Meaning Everything from Disparaging or Unflattering, Insulting, Offensive, Rude or Hurtful to Slanderous &/or Libelous...!!!
This would seem to Cover The Entire Spectrum
of Any Form of Displeasure with The Derivative Work...

Except That ( ... )
This Provision of The Creative Commons Definition on Moral Rights,
Also Suggests that if The Original Licensor were Unhappy with The Derived Work,
Their First Tier of Redressing that, Would be To Request that
The Maker of The Derived Image or Work,
Remove Any References of The Name of The Originator.
Clearly; ( ??? ) If The Original Licensor were so Dissatisfied with The Derived Work that they Would Want it Known that They Had nothing to Do with The Derived Work...
If They Could; They would simply Repress it in it's Entirety.

It May Be that in such A Situation;
That The Derived Work has so little in Common with The Original Work
That Suppressing this Original Work,
That was Merely Inspired by The Original Work;
Would be Inappropriate.

So in The Real World;
What might Derogatory Treatment Mean?

At The Extremium of Unambiguous Suppression;
Taking someone's photographs of their family and turning them into Explicit Sexual or Violent Situations would be Applicable...

But what would be The Extremium at The Other End...?
How might a Derivative Work be So Mildly Offensive to The Original Licensor,
That they would like to Suppress it,
But that The Creative Commons Licensing Agreement would Protect
The Original Work of The Artist Creating The Derivative Image...?

The Definitions in The Creative Commons Documents
Seems to leave this So Fuzzy & Ambivalent,
That It is Just Designed to Provoke Endlessly Pointless Arguments...

As A Derivative Artist that loves to Use The Naive & Guileless Snapshots
of Unprofessional Photographs,
That Occasionally— By Some UnIntended Fluke;
Accidentally Captures a Wonderfully Powerful Snapshot,
That is Both Very Strong is Some Respect,
And Very Weak in Others...
Such as featuring A Confusing &/or Muddled Background,
Or Containing Peripheral Elements that Distract The Viewer from The Good Bits.
A Little Bit of Constrained Collaging,
Can Really Bring Out A Much More Purposeful & Artistic Image.

- - (
It should be Noted though,
That i need more help with -The Constraining- part of this formula...
( ! ? )
) - -

That; i believe—
Is The Clear Intension of The Creative Commons Licensing Agreement.

If you Attach An "Attribution Creative Commons" Tag on your Work,
Then you have to Accept that your Work will be Transformed in
A Wide Variety of Ways that you Could Not Anticipate.
As Such: The Original Licensor should Only Take Action Against
The Derivative Artists Under The Most Egregious Circumstances,
And Not— When They Simply Don't Like It.

In Addition:
There are a few other exceptions that pertain to other considerations,
But none of these even remotely apply to this situation.

|-=-'*'-=-|-=-'*'-=-|-=-'*'-=-|-=-'*'-=-|-=-'*'-=-|-=-'*'-=-|-=-'*'-=-|-=-'*'-=-|-=-'*'-=-|

One PreDigression &/or Major Spoiler...!!!
This bit was added after i've been working on assembling
This Documentation Rant all Day and After much Reflection,
It all Boils down to One Consideration...

- - +
Did MlcTucker(Photography) Really Believe that The Collages i made from her Photographs Constitute;
In The Terminology of The Creative Commons Licensing Agreement Language: = Derogatory Treatment = ?

Well— Probably...

But was she Being Reasonable in This Evaluation?

No.

Why did she think this...?

Who knows.

Should i have Removed The Images?

-- Sigh --
My view on this is that When she put
The Creative Commons Licensing Agreement Designation
On Her Pictures;
She gave them over to The Devil ( ! )

That's how The Creative Commons Licensing Agreement Works.
If she'd wanted to have a trusted confidant Fix Her Pics,
Then she should have Attached a Perfectly Normal CopyRight to The Photographs,
Then found someone whose work she trusted
And asked that person to Make The Changes that she Wanted.

Attaching A Creative Commons Licensing Agreement to Them,
And Then Posting them to An Open Forum;
Such as Any of The Fix My Pic Groups...
Was EXACTLY What She Should NOT have Done...!
That was Exactly 180 Degrees of What She Should have Done.
It was an Exercise in Amazingly Poor Judgment
For Someone whose Hysterical Desire was to Preserve
The Dignity of Her Precious Photographs,
Should have done.
- - +

Should i have been Understanding & Removed the Pictures?

i was; and i did.

- - - (
It might be noted though...
That i removed the pictures because i was afraid of getting in trouble,
Rather than because i believed i was doing the right thing.
i consider This one of my most abhorrent personality flaws.
A vastly superior motivation for ones actions,
Would be to always do what you believed to be The Right Thing...
But i openly concede that i have no idea what The Right Thing is.
Ethics completely baffle me.
Really.
The Core of this confusion,
Is that i Strongly Believe that since we can Never know
How some Action or InAction that we Engage in, or Not Engage in—
Will Play Out...
Either 5 Minutes, or 5 Days, or 5 Years from now...

It might very well be that Stopping a Woman from Being Mugged,
Or Aborting a Defenseless Fetus,
Will; By The Wonderful Chain of Circumstances
That we fondly & blithely refer to as Cause & Effect;
Will— 20 Years from Now,
As a Direct Consequence of That well intended action,
Or Any Simple Act you May have Performed,
Will Cause The Last War of The Human Species,
Or Cause, by Circumstances Unimaginable;
The Universe to Evaporate.

Any Act; Either Good or Bad, Beneficial or Injurious to yourself,
May or May Not Cause Events to Occur that You Now Believe to Be The Most Appalling Things that Could Ever Possibly Occur.
) - - -

- - +

But Deleting The Images just wasn't good enough for One Person,
Who; Curiously, Had No Vested Interest in any of this...
Except to Make Endless Mischief.

)+.*.+( - )+.*.+( - )+.*.+( - )+.*.+( - )+.*.+( - )+.*.+( - )+.*.+( - )+.*.+(

i Love Digressions;
And/Or/But this is The Only One Featured in The Documentation Rant ( ! )

Something Tangential
That Happened At About this Same Time On Flickr:
i Sent out an Invitation to Various Flickr Members who had posted Snapshots of Their Wives or Girl Friends, in Various Conditions of UnDressedness,
To Repost them to My "Please Ruin My Pic" Group...!
Which is Both The AntiTheses & Equivalent of The Fix My Pix Groups ( ! )

Many of These Snapshots that i Invited were Delightfully Onerous in Their Crudity & Unabashed Fervent Potency.
From one of these Invitations; i Received this Query:
- - - :

Thanks for inviting me to post my two preggo pics on you site.
I actually like your work very much.
[ But ] The female bodies in your pieces are not given the respect that some might think they deserve, but I'm a big fan of that type of graphic humiliation.
Do I want to have my own body displayed as a fat piece of meat in some avante-garde surreal collage?
Actually, I find the idea to pretty intriguing ( and somewhat erotic).
I'll think about it for a day or an hour or so.
I may have other pics of myself that you would find easier to work with.
Full figure, naked, various degrees of exposure,
I'll get back to you.
Thanks for the invite.

[ from : Fun Sex Pics ( Pat Growler ) ]

- - - :
i found it fascinating that Even My Beloved Smut Crowd
Found my Images too Radical for Their Tastes...!

- - - :
My Response:
i'm somewhat conflicted by your response,
But i would like to believe that what i'm doing is paying homage to the original images...!
Many of The Images seem very strong to me,
But need a little help to make them into Really Artistic Compositions...

???
- - - : :

End of Digression

-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-.' / .-

Although i just said that The Digression Mentioned Previously
Would be The Only Digression...
This is Just One more...
This will be The Last ( Major ) One...!!!

Flickr Community Guidelines

Flickr accounts are intended for personal use, for our members to share photos and video that they themselves have created.

The following Community Guidelines are here to help you understand what it means to be a member of Flickr. Don't forget that your use of Flickr is subject to these Guidelines and our Terms of Use.
What to do

* Do play nice.
We're a community of many types of people, who all have the right to feel comfortable and who May Not think what you think, believe what you believe or see what you see. So, be polite and respectful in your interactions with other members.
* Do upload content that you have created.
Respect the copyright of others. This means don't steal photos or videos that other people have shared and pass them off as your own. (That’s what favorites are for.)
* Do moderate your content.
You need to take responsibility for ensuring that what you upload is appropriately flagged. If your judgment proves to be poor, we'll moderate your account to match appropriate ratings for safe search and/or content type and send you a warning.

Photo content must be flagged as "safe", "moderate" or "restricted." Video on Flickr may only include "safe" or "moderate" content -- "restricted" video content is not allowed on Flickr and will be removed.
Please note that although you may upload "safe", "moderate" or "restricted" content, some countries may only allow you to view "safe" or "safe" & "moderate" content. There's more about this in our FAQs.
* Do link back to Flickr when you post your Flickr content elsewhere.
The Flickr service makes it possible to post content hosted on Flickr to outside web sites. However, pages on other web sites that display content hosted on flickr.com must provide a link from each photo or video back to its page on Flickr.
* Do enjoy Flickr!
See the world through others’ eyes, participate, find your muse, and expand your horizons!

= What Not To Do =

Here’s the deal: In most circumstances, we like to give second chances, so we’ll send you a warning if you step across any of the lines listed below. Subsequent violations can result in account termination without warning.

* Don’t upload anything that isn't yours.
This includes other people's photos, video and/or stuff you've collected from around the Internet. Accounts that consist primarily of such collections may be terminated at any time.
* Don’t forget the children.
Take the opportunity to filter your content responsibly. If you would hesitate to show your photos or videos to a child, your mum, or Uncle Bob, that means it needs to be filtered. So, ask yourself that question as you upload your content and moderate accordingly. If you don’t, it’s likely that one of two things will happen. Your account will be reviewed then either moderated or terminated by Flickr staff.
* Don’t show nudity in your buddy icon.
Only content considered "safe" is appropriate for your buddy icon. If we find that you've uploaded a buddy icon that contains "moderate" or "restricted" content, we'll remove the buddy icon, moderate your account as “restricted” and send you a warning. If we find you doing it again, we’ll terminate your account.
* Don’t upload content that is illegal or prohibited.
If we find you doing that, your account will be deleted and we'll take appropriate action, which may include reporting you to the authorities.
* Don’t vent your frustrations, rant, or bore the brains out of other members.
Flickr is not a venue for you to harass, abuse, impersonate, or intimidate others. If we receive a valid complaint about your conduct, we’ll send you a warning or terminate your account.
* Don’t be creepy.
You know the guy. Don't be that guy.
* Don’t use your account to host web graphics like logos and banners.
Your account will be terminated if we find you using it to host graphic elements of web page designs, icons, smilies, buddy icons, forum avatars, badges, and other non-photographic elements on external web sites.
* Don’t use Flickr for commercial purposes.
Flickr is for personal use only. If we find you selling products, services, or yourself through your photostream, we will terminate your account. Any other commercial use of Flickr, Flickr technologies (including APIs, FlickrMail, etc), or Flickr accounts must be approved by Flickr. For more information on leveraging Flickr APIs, please see our Services page. If you have other open questions about commercial usage of Flickr, please feel free to contact us.

Here are some other things to keep in mind:

Other People (their content, their behavior)
You will see all sorts of things on Flickr, some of which may offend you. If you are offended by a photo or video you can either click away or you can mark it as poorly moderated by clicking on the "Flag this photo" link on a photo page under “Additional Information”. If you think there's immediate cause for concern, you can report content and/or someone's behavior to Flickr staff via the “Report Abuse” link that’s available in the footer of every page.

Copyright Infringement
If you see photos or videos that you’ve created in another member’s photostream, don't panic. This is probably just a misunderstanding and not malicious. A good first step is to contact them and politely ask them to remove it. If that doesn't work, please file a Notice of Infringement with the Yahoo! Copyright Team who will take it from there.

You may be tempted to post an entry on your photostream or in our public forum about what's happening, but that's not the best way to resolve a possible copyright problem. We don't encourage singling out individuals like this on Flickr.

In Conclusion
We’ve crafted these guidelines to ensure that everyone within the community has the experience they want. It’s important that you understand the importance of moderating your content responsibly. If you don't feel that you can abide by our Community Guidelines as outlined above, maybe Flickr isn't for you.

If you ever have any questions or comments, we'd love to hear from you. Please feel free to drop us a line through Help by Email.

The Flickreenos

- - - :

End of The Second Digression

( - * - ) . ( - * - ) . ( - * - ) . ( - * - ) . ( - * - ) . ( - * - ) . ( - * - ) . ( - * - )

Although this was all very annoying for me...
There were actually only a very few hamsters & parakeets involved with it...
They are:
-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-
Me: chrstphre campbell
The Maker of The Allegedly Offending Collages

-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-
MlcTuckerPhotography
The Creative Commons Licensor of The Source Material Photographs

-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-
GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines/And Others!
The Administrator for "Fix My Pic Please"
A Group within Flickr,
Which is An Eggregious RipOff of The Original Group;
"Please Fix My Pic" ( ! )
And Actually shouldn't even be involved in This Fiasco,
Since i Never Posted The Collages to her Group—
But it Turned out That She was the Sole Provacetour in This Own Mess.
She ( He? ) Has also used Multiple Accounts to Appear to be Several Parakeets that All Held her Position...
The Other Accounts ( ? ) +
Gwennie2006
U.S. Marines

-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-
Heather
Flickr Administrator that Summarily Deleted My CENSORED Image;
Noting that This Expression of Benign Protest to The UnWarranted Harassment that i was Receiving from GrfixDziner was:
Posting it as you've done is abusive and could be considered as harassment.
I'm not surprised that people are upset. ( ! )

-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-
Ellis Nadler
The Voice of UnBiased Reason

-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-
Wm Jaz
A Curious ByStander

-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-
Zetetics
Another Voice of Pure Reason in An Age of Vacuous Intolerant Kookiness

-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-
Kenneth Moyle
An Informative & Well Read Scholar

-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:-

( = Finally! = )

Here is What Happened?

A few Weeks ago; In June 2009,
i found; Either on The Flickr Group; “Fix My Pic Please”
Or The Original Group of This Same Genré; “Please Fix My Pic!”
Two Pictures that i thought had a lot of potential
For making Interesting Collages with...

The Two Original Images were From
MlcTuckerPhotography's PhotoStream
And Both Were both Flagged/Tagged with
The Attribution Creative Common’s License.

The Couple by The Mirror & The Couple Facing The Camera

From These; i Created Two Collages






















When i posted them to Flickr,
i Linked Both Collages to Their Source Images
And Attached The Source Image to My Collages.
And gave Credit to All The Elements that i used in Each Collage
( Where i could recall where they came from! )

Shortly Thereafter:

Apparently; MlcTuckerPhotography was so annoyed with my renditions
( particularly the later image with the balloons )
That she posted this warning to all other members of The Fix My Pix Please Group...
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

There is someone named chrstphre that is taking our photos and turning them inappropriate. I know that we share our photos on here to have people work on them, but I am appaled at what he did to the pictures of my family members.

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Then One of The Administrators for That Group got involved and Sent me this Missive...
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Hi,
I had member let me know they were quite upset with the editi you did of their wedding shot:
[ Removed by Flickr ]

While I am all up for a laugh at times, others are not, in particular this member.
Could you please remove your work.
Decapatation
[ Decapitation ] would fall under the realm of untasteful.

Thanks.


By they way I work very hard on my groups and stuff at flickr.
I have dedicated the last several years of my life.... [ every ] non-working waking moment on a foundation for a dear friend that was strangled at 17.
This really rubs me the wrong way.
Thanks for understanding

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

What i find particularly fascinating is that she has interpreted
The transcendental enlightenment of the male figure
As an act of violent decapitation...???

Irregardless of this;
Since i always chose the path of least resistance;
i did the right thing;
by my standards,
and removed the offending image...
By covering them with Censored Blocks

{:=:{:=:{:=:{:=:{:=:{o}:=:}:=:}:=:}:=:}:=:}

In The Earliest Hours of This Fiasco,
i was Banned from The Fix My Pic Please Group...

BANNED...!!!

Various Comments:

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Trevor Dennis ]
Says:
To be fair, you do have excellent photoshop skills...
.
.
.
.... for a five year old!

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Zetetics ]
Says:
Wow....what maturity. Keep up the good work despite what others say.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Zetetics ]
Says:
I think Trevor has some nice portraits that you might want to use in some of your work. Maybe even Trevor's head. And here I thought those dudes from New Zealand were pretty hip. NOT!

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
A reminder:
www.flickr.com/guidelines.gne
This is the polite email from GrfxDziner:
FlickrMail / Sent
To:
chrstphre
chrstphre campbell
Subject: Fix my pic stuff...
Hi,
I had member let me know they were quite upset with the [ editing ] you did of their wedding shot:
www.flickr.com/photos/chrstphre/3672725316/in/set-7215760...
While I am all up for a laugh at times, others are not, in particular this member. Could you please remove your work. Decapatation would fall under the realm of untasteful. Thanks.
By they way I work very hard on my groups and stuff at flickr. I have dedicated the last several years of my life....evry non-working waking moment on a foundation for a dear friend that was
strangled at 17. This really rubs me the wrong way. Thanks for understanding
- -
You of course can lie all you want, but you have the email, and so does flickr staff. It is their site remember, not yours. That is why you have guidelines to follow. Being polite is number one.
And GrfxDziner is always polite. You should give it a shot too.
- . - . -

{
Spoiler:
It was later determined that GrfxDziner & Gwennie2006
Are the Same Person ( ! )
}

/ . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \ * / . \

Along with The Primary Collage that Seemed to Receive The Bulk of The Attention...
There were 3 Additional Pictures that i Attached a CENSORED Block to.
Two of These were Unfortunately Innocent Bystanders,
But The Original Photographers haven't weighed in on Any of This,
So i have left them = As Is = With The Black Boxes Over Them...???

= . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . =

Title : The Hand of Love















My Comment Under The Collage :
Special Thnax to All Those— Whose Wandering Ba & Ka's Did Knowing & Willingly Contributed A Background &/or Mysterious Allegorical Elementals To This Collage!
Partial Accreditation for : A Hand of Love
Couple : M1TuckerPhotography
Blue Alien : pureEVA
Nude : Translucent Amoebae

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
Assaulted & Belittled from :

[ Source Image Went Here ]

Note reconstruction of The Fireplace...!!!

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By MlcTuckerPhotography ]
Says:

This is Highly Inappropriate!

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
i assume that there are several tiers above 'highly'
As this easily could have much worse... ( ??? )

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Ellis Nadler ]
Says:
Take me to The Kittens.

- - - - : :

New Title : This Picture didn't quite receive the same quantity of wrath as a few of my other recent collages... But just to be safe, i thought that i should 'withdraw' it...!
Some people just don't want to have their pictures toyed with...!

This Picture didn't quite receive the same quantity of wrath as a few of my other recent collages... But just to be safe, i thought that i should 'withdraw' it...! Some people just don't want to have their pictures toyed with...!

= . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . =

This was a Very Badly Done Collage of An Old Water Damaged Image of A Girl That i Ostensibly Turned into A Mermaid of Sorts... i thought it turned out badly, and Actually Welcomed the Opportunity to Cover It Up and make it into A Political Statement about Nothing In Particular.

Title : The Mermaid

TheMermaid / Reposted for Documentation

Special Thanx to All Those—
Whose Wandering Ba & Ka's Did Knowing
& Willingly Contributed A Background
&/or Mysterious Allegorical Elementals
To This Collage!
Partial Accreditation for : The Mermaid
The Mermaid : RickMape
Mobius Ants : MC Escher
Angel : From Kit / Abby Glenn

Additional Comments :

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
Ripped off from :
The Original Image by RickManpe

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
Um, we do not rip things off. Let's get that straight okay!

- - - - : :

New Title :
For Those Artists that like to fix Other People's Pictures from such Venues as; " Fix My Pic Please!". It doesn't give you the right to fix it anyway you want...! You have to fix it in Exactly The Way that the Person Posting it wanted you to Fix it... Or Else...!

For Those Artists that like to fix Other People's Pictures from such Venues as; " Fix My Pic Please!". It doesn't give you the right to fix it anyway you want...! You have to fix it in Exactly The Way that the Person Posting it wanted you to Fix it... Or

= . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . =

This was another badly done collage of a small child running amok in an imaginary town of geometrical blocks...???

{ Somehow Misplaced The Original Collage ! }

{ i Also Misplaced The Comments...
Which was something from Gwen ( et. al ) that was something like;
"We do not steal pictures... ?"
}

New Title : i Strongly Advise Everyone to Stay The Heck Away from The Fix My Pic Groups...!!!

i Strongly Advise Everyone to Stay The Heck Away from The Fix My Pic Groups...!!!

= . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . = . ' . )*( . ' . =


- * . * - * . * - * . * - * . * - * . * - * . * - * . * - * . * - * . * - * . * - * . * -

The First Posting Of The Primary Collage
With The CENSORED Block Covering It.

Apparently when you take a photo from "Please Fix My Pic!" it doesn't give you full allowances to Fix it anyway you want...! You have to Fix it in EXACTLY The way that the Person posting it, Wanted you to fix it... by you.

i may have just been kidding around, But this picture, Really, Really was Censored by Flickr...!!!

Special Thanx to All Those—
Whose Wandering Ba & Ka's Did Knowing
& Willingly Contributed A Background
&/or Mysterious Allegorical Elementals
To This Collage!
Partial Accreditation for : 1 + 1 = 1
Couple : MlcTuckerPhotography
Vn's Hand & Seven : Wm Jaz
Hearts : iPhoto

Various Comments:

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
Derived from :
[ The Original Image by MlcTuckerPhotography ]

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
This is the one I mean. This is not appropriate

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Trevor Dennis ]
Says:
Not cool

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
chrstphre, you need to remove this today. Read your flickr mail. Remebr when you work on someone else's photo, you do not ever own the rights to it...they do. If they do not like your edit, you must remove it. Freedom of expression will only apply to your own work, not someone elses.

Read my other comments regarding the terminology of your linking. If you have some problem with human kind, find an alternative way, and group, to deal with yourself.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
Since The Dillweed; ( GrfxDniner ), has blocked me from sending her emails...
i will have to respond here...
As a result of this fiasco, i have decided to mend my evil ways to some degree and invite any pictures that i would like to severely modify to my alternative group: Please Ruin My Pic!
i think that this will work out for the best, for all concerned parties.

Although it does take some of the surprise out of it.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Wm Jas ]
Says:
You sure get a lot of mileage out of that sugar glider photo!

What's covered up by that "censored" sticker that got everyone so huffy? Is his head exploding or something?

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
I am a he by the way. Please remove your most distatseful edit. Thank you

Read the email again. It is very selfexplainatory. You were obscene with your work. And you did not handle it well at all.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
( For Wm Jaz ) : Yes... i really like that picture, and i have so few of hands holding things...! As i mentioned before, A hand coming in from The Edge, Should be interpreted as The Hand, or Will, of Gawd, Either Taking or Inserting A Soul Into The Image Plane...???

( For GrfxDzier ) : i think that i may have confused your gender with MlcTuckerPhotography whose profile i looked up... ( Oops! )
As for This Picture & It's Content
And The Documentation of This Fiasco...
It Stays!

Stop trying to MicroManage The Universe...!

i am also incensed by people that use a word like "Obscene" Carelessly,
In situations where it clearly does not apply.

You have henceforth lost all credibility with me.

Bug Off.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
Read the rules, and the email one more time. Really.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Trevor Dennis ]
Says:
Hey the picture was not cool, but your jerking knee is worse by far.
Get over yourself.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
You've become so scary ( deeply psycho ) about this
That although i hate to involve the innocent children that run Flickr,
i'm going to have to ask their advice concerning this...
i've taken down the pictures,
Apologized for my careless behavior and mended my ways,
But you just won't let up...!

i'm going to have to report you as a pest!

Sooooorrrrrrrry.
- - - :

This is The Report that i sent to Flickr Abuse Reporting...

- - - :
I'm reporting abuse on the following page:

( slight error in this section due to my inexperience with reporting abuse... ! )

The picture that seems to be the principle focus of the trouble is:
www.flickr.com/photos/chrstphre/3672725316/?a ddedcomment=...

i found the picture of the couple on Fix My Pic Please
And changed it in a manner that the original poster found unsatisfactory.
One of the Administrators also got involved in this ( GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines )
And insisted that i remove the picture.

Within a day or two of posting my collage; i removed it
( by coving it up with a CENSORED Block ( ! )
And Then apologized for my careless use of the original image, and mentioned, as well, that i would henceforth only be using pictures from my own group;
Please Ruin My Pic.

It might also be noted that i've been transforming images in this manner for a couple of years now, and the response has routinely been glee & delight, or passive benign indifference..!

These Steps were insufficient for GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines, who continues to harass me about this...???

One very troubling and mysterious element of this is that the way that i changed the image was to add a bunch of valentine hearts coming away of the woman's head, while i transformed the man's head into a group of balloons, floating way...
GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines somehow interpretted this as a violent act of decapitation, While it was substantially more akin to an allegorical representation of spiritual transcendence...???

i am deeply troubled by all this attention and would like some guidance from Flickr about this.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely; Chrstphre

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
How Flickr Responded:

FlickrMail / Inbox
From: Flickr Customer Care
Subject: [Flickr Case 1245331] Re: Report Abuse: Other Concerns

Hello, chrstphre!

This is an automatically generated copy of a help case reply:
-------------------------
I've removed "Apparenlty when you take a photo from "Fix My Pic Please " it doesn't give you full allowances to Fix it anyway you want...! You have to Fix it in EXACTLY The way that the Person posting it, Wanted you to fix it..."
from your photostream.
Posting it as you've done is abusive and could be considered as harassment.
I'm not surprised that people are upset.

Regards,

Heather
-------------------------
If you'd like to respond, please send the email to case1245331@support.flickr.com
To ensure a timely response.

=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+=+-+
Peripheral Notes & Mail

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Flickr Mail from : r8r ]
Writes :
Subject: the censored picture
Your picture edit didn't seem all that untasteful to me. I
don't understand the picture-owner taking offense.
It's not a "decapatation" (sic) at all; it's a cartoon. It
doesn't seem mean-spirited to me, and I think they
overreacted.
But since they DID take offense, I suppose you have to
apologize and play nice.
All the best to you!
- -
My Reply:
Thank you very much for your very reasonable and restrained support...!
i always try to be polite, but as i pointed out to Zetetics,
The person whose pictures were the source material for the two pictures that i made collages from, Never actually asked me to remove them...!
i'm going to ask her exactly what she would like me to do and i will acquiesce to whatever she would like...!

Thanx Again...!!!

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Flickr Mail from : Zetetics Tim Blackburn ]
Writes :
Subject: Right wing nazi's

Well, since I commented on your ongoing battle with these morons they decided to start sending me emails. They resorted to name calling and negativity. Of course that one lady who said stuff blocked me so now I have blocked her and so much for freedom of expression in the US of A.

I don't think you did anything wrong and they singled you out and tried to make an example of you. Keep up the good work and don't let these idiots bother you. We went through eight years of personal rights being eaten away by the conservative right and don't even get me started about the acts of aggression these "righteous" people have done. There is no point in trying to argue with someone who thinks that god is backing them up on their shallow minds.

Do you ever do postal mail these days? I will like very much to send you some prints. I know you don't want to get back into the whole mail art thing and I totally respect that. Just let me know.

Thanks!
Tim

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Second Posting Of The Primary Collage
With The CENSORED Block Covering It.
- - - :
i may have just been kidding around,
But this picture, Really, Really was Censored by Flickr...!!!

i may have just been kidding around, But this picture, Really, Really was Censored by Flickr...!!!

Comments by Me Attached to The Image:
Original CC Image by MlcTuckerPhotography.

That is: This is a RePosting of A Picture just like it,
( With That Big CENSORED Block...!!! )
That was Deleted by Flickr Staff member : Heather
i have also Blocked both parties that were so offended by it,
So that ( ? ) they won't even be aware now ( ? ) that it's still here...???

The manner by which Flickr became aware of it,
Apparently; Was that i went to them to ask for clarification about how i should respond to the harassment by GrfxDziner/Gwennie2006/U.S. Marines.
Although i had conceded to all her demands regarding the removal of this image,
She continued to pester me about it...
But i'm even more concerned and troubled that Flickr would remove a picture that doesn't depict anything...!
It is Only a Political Statement.
What is this saying about Flickr...???

. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'. '*'.

Additional Comments:

{
In The Spirit of Full Disclosure... ( ! )
i have made some very Slight Editing Changes to My Own Posts,
To Correct Minor Spelling Errors, Punctuation Improvements,
And Contextual Stylization Refinements... ( ! )
The Meaning, Intent & Emotional Flavor of All Posts
Have remained Completely Intact ( ! )
}

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Chrstphre ]
says:
Since The Original Image that was really at the center of all this controversy has been mysteriously ( Mysterious to Me! ) removed by Flickr...
i've been forced to move all The Documentation of This Fiasco to My Blog...

Most of What Happened...

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Brandon Haney ]
says:
It's a shame people can be that closed minded with no sense of humor. You made their embarrassingly ordinary photos a lot more interesting and fun. If their photos are that sacred to them maybe they shouldn't show them to anyone if they have such brittle feelings.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Zetetics ]
Says:
I think the whole thing is amusing and sad at the same time. Some people don't have anything better than to get all into the business of others. I am sure if they had their way your account would be removed, your internet connection, your computer itself, maybe surgical methods would be demanded as well. I think it is pretty much a sign of the times.

Keep up the good work and f*$% them if they can't take a joke.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
You should not have put the original edit on your blog. That is wrong, and you continue to violate the guidelines of flickr. You did NOT have permission to use that person's photo, let alone post it again.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
This is the supposed harrassing email:

FlickrMail / Sent
To:
chrstphre
chrstphre campbell

Subject: Fix my pic stuff...
Hi,
I had member let me know they were quite upset with the editi you did of their wedding shot:
www.flickr.com/photos/chrstphre/3672725316/in /set-7215760...

While I am all up for a laugh at times, others are not, in particular this member. Could you please remove your work. Decapatation would fall under the realm of untasteful. Thanks.

By they way I work very hard on my groups and stuff at flickr. I have dedicated the last several years of my life....evry non-working waking moment on a foundation for a dear friend that was strangled at 17. This really rubs me the wrong way. Thanks for understanding


Or, return to your sent mail.


You of course can lie all you want, but you have the email, and so does flickr staff. It is their site remember, not yours. That is why you have guidelines to follow. Being polite is number one. And GrfxDziner is always polite. You should give it a shot too.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By KennethMoyle ]
Says:
I like you treatment of that photo - you took a nice but bland snapshot with harsh shadows and made whimsical art out of it.

As for the gwennies claim that "You did NOT have permission to use that person's photo, let alone post it again." - well, according to the CC license on that photo, we are all given the right to remix the photo ... so you had every right. Especially given that the photo was posted to "fix my pic."

creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en

And given what you've done to some other photos, well, I dare say the happy married couple got off easy :)

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
Kenneth read the Moral Rights portion in the link you gave. Our group is a friendly group. we try to help folks. We do NOT offend people. You do have many rights with a CC license. It is not the derivatives property. Read through it again if you must.

That is so often the case, people don't read things, even when they think it is proving their point. Your link proves chrstphr does not have the right to post the edit. Probably why it was removed once already by flickr. They actually understant the rights of a CC license

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Zetetics ]
Says:
Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines sent me a flickr mail about all of this. Why? I sent a reply and in there I asked for her not to send me any more flickr mail. So...what did Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines do? She sent me one last flickr mail before she "blocked" me. Here is her mail to me:

"you're pathetic. get a real life will ya"

Sad Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines. Very sad. Like I said before, you need to take a look in the mirror.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
I do, and why don't you post what you sent? You don't have any idea of the situation, just like you put in your email.

Like I said in the origianl, you shouldn't threaten to steal peoples pics.

I would recommend others block you too, so you can't take theirs.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Zetetics ]
Says:
Just to clear the air. I have not stolen anyone's photos. You have a group that you promote which desires for photos to be modified. If they are not modified the way you want them then you decide to take up a cause and create a problem. Here is the mail that I sent to you in reply to your original mail to me:

"Hi Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines. Actually for you to be sending me flickr mail backs up his point quite a bit. I don't steal people's images but I know many, many, many artists that use other images in an art form called collage. While I don't know all that went on here in this whole process I would have to say you sending me an email went over the line. Please do NOT send me any more flickr mails.

Time for you to stop this nonsense and go take a look in the mirror."

That you have taken to calling me names and then blocking me and now accusing me of stealing photos and asking others to block me says a lot about you as a person. I never did anything to you or called you any names. You sent me mail when I had nothing to do with any of this. I asked you to leave me alone.

My comments to chrstphre's photos are for him in support of his work as an artist. I still stand behind that. I don't know why you continue to hover around his photos and send emails out to people. You are the offensive one. Please leave us all alone.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
Great, now chrstphr needs to remove the image. One because flickr already did, and two because that is the way it works. Thanks for the further explanation mr Zetetics.....and be sure you do not steal other peoples photos, that is wrong. We are in agreement on that, right?

I am not at all the offensive one. chrstphre offended a member of my group, you offended a member of my group too, and under you own admission, you have not the knowledge of the situation. Please read the cc rules. When they are not adhered to, it is simple, the image must be reomoved. chrstpre just needs to remove it, and you need to stop saying that your are going to use other peoples heads. You people are very strange, and offend people....even when you don't know what you are talking about. just read more of the details.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By KennethMoyle ]
Says:
:)

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
Yes, Kenneth I am aware my work sucks, I never claimed otherwise. The thing is chrstphr just needs to follow the rules. That would have this whole thing non-existent. As an admin you are supposed to stand up for members when they have been wronged. I assume you would do that too. Hopefully after the holiday flickr will remove it once again, as it does violate posting rules. It is really that simple.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
First of All: i find it very annoying that all of the principle complaints in this issue have blocked me,
So that i can't send them private correspondence.

Many thanks to those few of you that have responded in support of free speech & the concept of Creative Commons.
If some people are really so fragile that they can't tolerate artists mucking with they precious photographs,
Then they shouldn't attach a CC Licensing agreement to them,
And they should surely not post them to groups which invite artists to do just that.
That; To my way of thinking, Is Entrapment.

Another point that i find amazingly odd...
This picture ( above ) doesn't depict anything,
Why is there a continued effort to have IT removed...???

And Then:
Under perfectly Ordinary Copyright Laws,
i have every right ( legally ) to have created the said collages
Under The Fair Use Provision
By making Parodies of The Original Images.
I did not Steal the Original Images,
i was mocking them.

But in All Honesty; i was not.
This is what is truly making me completely Crazy...

Is why they are being interpreted to be so violent and offensive...???
In one;
The woman is giving her hand in love,
The little hearts above her head show this.
The pumpkins over the mans head
Are showing that while he is taking her hand,
His own feelings are not necessarily malicious,
But more complicated.

In the Other image,
The woman is clearly in a state of loving ecstasy,
While the man is experiencing transcendental illumination,
His spirit has transcended his physical body
And is now in a state of pure bliss.

How anyone could every see either of these pictures
As acts of violence completely baffles me.

But---

i would very much like someone that is not currently being blocked
By MlcTuckerPhotography to contact her
And ask her to post to this tread.

What would SHE like me to do with The Original Images?
Curiously; She initially expressed some real irritation with The Collages,
But after i covered them up with The CENSORED Blocks,
She was apparently satisfied and left the discussion.

These images of The CENSORED Blocks
Are a completely different issue
And i would very much like them to Stay!

MlcTuckerPhotography:
What would YOU like me to do with The Collages?
Anything you want will be made true.

Thanx to EVERYONE for Supporting YOUR RIGHT to Speak Out...
( But not everyone elses...!!! )

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines ]
Says:
free speech applies to your own work chrstphre, not tohers. Make all the collages you desire, and in any fashion you desire with your own work. That is what artists do. When you use someone elses work, you have rules, and your freedoms are considerably restricted, because it is not just your, but someone else's too.

Read the CC license one more time, and again after that if you must. Or, how about shooting your own wedding shot, with your family members. Then you can create any collage you desire. Cut their heads, cut their hands off (which happens to very offensive to some cultures). With your own photos, you are in complete freedom. Whit someone elses you are not. Just read the rules.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
A Small Superfluous Point:

i just now discovered something which seems odd to me...
( A Tiny Digression for a moment... )

As i was pulling up The Personal Icon for Gwennie2006
i discovered that The Link Property Address is None Other than Grfxdziner...!!!
How can that be...???
Unless they're the same person...???
Which is especially interesting because the Fix My Pic Please Group
Has Two Chief Administrators; Gwennie2006 & Grfxdziner...
But if they're the same person...???
So it turns out that
MlcTuckerPhotography's Link Property Address is Stmpson17...?
But Mine; Chrstphre is Chrstphre
Zetetics' is Zetetics
KennethMoyle is a little Different, it's Moylek
Where do these Link Property Address Come from...
And if Gwennie2006 & GrfxDziner are the same person...
Then it's Not A Few Hamsters that are causing all this trouble...
It's just ONE Sick Parakeet ( ! )
Even MlcTuckerPhotography is no longer interested in this fiasco...!!!

- - - - -
Anyways...

Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines Posted this a little Earlier...

( This takes on a completely different tack if Gwen & Grfx are The Same Person...!!! )

- - - - -

This is the supposed harrassing [ harassing ] email:

FlickrMail / Sent
To:
chrstphre
chrstphre campbell

Subject: Fix my pic stuff...
Hi,
I had member let me know they were quite upset with the editi you did of their wedding shot:
www.flickr.com/photos/chrstphre/3672725316/in /set-7215760...

While I am all up for a laugh at times, others are not, in particular this member. Could you please remove your work. Decapatation [ Decapitation ] would fall under the realm of untasteful. [ distasteful ] Thanks.

By they way I work very hard on my groups and stuff at flickr. I have dedicated the last several years of my life....evry [ every ] non-working waking moment on a foundation for a dear friend that was strangled at 17. This really rubs me the wrong way. Thanks for understanding

Or, return to your sent mail.

You of course can lie all you want, but you have the email, and so does flickr staff. It is their site remember, not yours. That is why you have guidelines to follow. Being polite is number one. And GrfxDziner is always polite. You should give it a shot too.

- - - - :

This was Not the Harassing biddles...
The Harassing biddles came after this,
After i'd covered up the allegedly offending Collage
with The CENSORED Block.
Sadly; That Original Image and all the subsequent comments were Deleted by The Flickr Staff ( Heather ) ( ! )

Also; What is The Lying Part...???

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By U.S. Marines ( of The Gwen Continuum ) ]
Says:
That is true, you are not allowed to use portions of someone's photo, if they do not like your work. It only makes sense, it is not yours to begin with. While the original photographer trusted you to help them with their image, you did a job they didn't like. That is thier right not yours. Believe me, I fought for freedom. Create something original, and then I will support you as well. Until that time you must follow the rules, and abide by the license.

It is explained in the post from Kenneth. Just read it. You may send me a flickrMail if you wish to discuss it futher. Good day.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
Well; The Link Property Address for U.S. Marines is usmarines...

But Every Picture in his/her The Photo Streams
Is Plagiarized from other ( public domain ) sources...
There isn't a single personally taken picture,
Except for perhaps a Screen shot...???

Also: This PhotoStream is suspiciously equivalent to Gwen's
projects | DC Memorial Foundation
projects | DC Memorial...

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
Here is The Kind of Creative Commons Licensing Agreements...

Briefly...

Briefly...

The pictures in Question were given The First Classification: ( By: )
Which i adhered to scrupulously...

Could you ( Gwen ( et. al. ) ) please provide a link to where all these exceptions to these rules are mentioned...! ( ? )

Thanx!

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By U.S. Marines ( Another Persona of Gwennie2006 ]
Says:
Yes, it is Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines's photo.
Wasn't that nice of him to let us use it. I found it most gerous of him. Obviously you didn't look at gwennie's profile, because you would see he is a male.

And no the vet ad is made by Gwennie2006/GrfxDziner/U.S. Marines, the screen cap has permission as do the Library of congress. Like I said, you just need permission.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By U.S. Marines ( Not a real person ) ]
Says:
Here chrstphr:
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en

This is the link Kenneth put in above. Read the Moral Rights part, it will explain it to you. I commented to you over the weekend. I will help you with your coding stuff. I like doing that, as well as your work. You do really nice things. Let's just get along, okay. Thanks

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
i have taken the liberty of posting the Moral Rights Part here...

Moral Rights

Moral Rights for Creative Commons

What is your ( since i'm convinced you're all one person )
Interpretation of this...?

My view is:

Moral Rights; This is good...
This seems to say that if i create a Collage from Someone's Creative Commons Attribution Licensed Work...
And they are unhappy with the result...
They can Request that i REMOVE THEIR NAME from my Collage...
But NOT Request that i Remove The Collage itself...!!!

Of course... They can Request that...
And i might even remove it,
But that's Not Included in The Creative Commons Licensing Agreement Rules.

Then: ( This is The Very Fuzzy Part )
If The Original Creator Believed that the work was Truly offensive,
or has broken other laws,
They they can seek redress from The Offending Derived Image...

But of course;
My own position is that While MlcTuckerPhotography doesn't like my collages,
They are in No Manner, Offensive to A Reasonably Prudent Viewer.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By U.S. Marines ]
Says:
chrstphr, I have to head out for awhile. Send me a flickrmail if you like.
I commented in one of your groups. Honestly I forget the name now, but you were looking for help with codes. Let me know if you need that.

I am sure if we can work this one image out, you will be welcomed into the Fix My Pic Please group again. Alot of hardwork goes into a group as you know....and no one has anything against you at all. You are a great artist....and to be completely honest I love the staircasr stuff you ar working on. Really fascinating. Good Luck my friend. And your Columbus and Wizard edits you did for gwennie are stellar in every way. Keep up the great work.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By U.S. Marines ]
Says:
Sorry, I posted as you did, so my comment came after. I look through it again too. Like I said I have to head out for a bit. Thanks.

:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
[ Comment By chrstphre ]
Says:
Well... That was the craziest posting yet...???
It was almost an apology for everything
posted prior to this...???

( !!! ) ???

Unfortunately; He won't be responding,
As i have Blocked Everyone concerned with this...!

Fortunately; i saved everything and will
Repost EVERYTHING concerning this Fiasco
On my Blog...!

MlcTuckerPhotography is Still UnBlocked
& i would like to hear from her...!

|. + .| =
|. + .| = |. + .| = |. + .| = |. + .| = |. + .| = |. + .| = |. + .| = |. + .| = |. + .|

The Last Little Bits...

Today: Thursday, July 9th '09
i received two more notes attached to The Blocked Balloon Image from a Whoville,
That seemed to be apologizing to some degree for Gwen's behavior and offering various excuses...
Unfortunately; i discarded these before i saved them...
But i do have a appended version of both... ( ! )

Whoville said:
The genuine offer for help, and all the other comments suspicously disappeared chrstphr, because you blocked them. That's what happens. Yes, gwennie and Grfx are the same. Grfx was gwennie's friend that the book was being written for.

gwennie2006 | the Power of Art...an Introduction - Yahoo!™ Image Search

But, the admins in the original fix my pic group got banned them, because of a post to their si ...

- - -
And :

Whoville said:
This is really fascinating. Do you study MC Escher. He was a genious. Do you know how to create three point perspective by hand? Do you know how to alter the vanishing points? Do you know about the Droste Effect....not the computer rendered ones, but the real ones?

Do you ever see patterns and stuff, visually I mean...like in front of your eyes, and moving? I am not at all being a pest or wise guy or anything, I am very serious, and curious. You work is awesome chrstphr, really.

- - - - - - - - - : :

i later demonstrated to my own satisfaction that this was merely another Gwen Continuum Persona...!!!
It would appear that This Gwen ( Sex Indeterminate ) doesn't have any real friends to come to ( its ) defense, Only Fragments of it's own broken personality spectrum.

???

i hope that this is over with now.










Friday, July 03, 2009

Something Very Odd From Flickr...

A little while ago; i gathered a few pictures from The Flickr Group:
Fix My Pic Please
And Fixed them in my own twisted ways.
Both pictures, featured here,
Were marked as Creative Commons with The Appendant ( By: )
Which means that if you use the picture in any way,
The Original Photographer,

In this case: mlctuckerphotography,
Has given you permission to do so,
So long as you give them credit for the original photography..
.

The Two Collages that i created were:















Taken from: Here

And:

















Taken from Here

And then The Craziness Started...
Apparently;
mlctuckerphotography was so annoyed with my renditions
( particularly the later image with the balloons )

That she posted this warming to all other members of The Fix My Pix Please Group...

There is someone named chrstphre that is taking our photos and turning them inappropriate. I know that we share our photos on here to have people work on them, but I am appaled at what he did to the pictures of my family members.

Then One of The Administrators for That Group got involved and Sent me this Missive...

Hi,
I had member let me know they were quite upset with the editi you did of their wedding shot:

[ Removed by Flickr ]

While I am all up for a laugh at times, others are not, in particular this member. Could you please remove your work. Decapatation would fall under the realm of untasteful. Thanks.

By they way I work very hard on my groups and stuff at flickr. I have dedicated the last several years of my life....evry non-working waking moment on a foundation for a dear friend that was strangled at 17. This really rubs me the wrong way. Thanks for understanding

What i find particularly fascinating is that she has interpreted the transcendental enlightenment of the male figure as an act of violent decapitation...???

Irregardless of this;
Since i always chose the path of least resistance;
i did the right thing; by my standards, and removed the offending image...
By covering them with Censored Blocks
















Which seemed to only inflame GrfxDziner;
So she continued to pester me with Additional posts...

So i very politely asked Flickr to Intervene by means of this request for clarification:

The picture that seems to be the principle focus of the trouble is:
[ No longer available at Flickr ]

i found the picture of the couple on Fix My Pic Please
And changed it in a manner that the original poster found unsatisfactory.
One of the Administrators also got involved in this ( GrfxDziner )
And insisted that i remove the picture.

Within a day or two of posting my collage; i removed it
( by coving it up with a CENSORED Block ( ! )
And Then apologized for my careless use of the original image, and mentioned, as well, that i would henceforth only be using pictures from my own group;
Please Ruin My Pic.

It might also be noted that i've been transforming images in this manner for a couple of years now, and the response has routinely been glee & delight, or passive benign indifference..!

These Steps were insufficient for GrfxDziner, who continues to harass me about this...???

One very troubling and mysterious element of this is that the way that i changed the image was to add a bunch of valentine hearts coming away of the woman's head, while i transformed the man's head into a group of balloons, floating way...
GrfxDziner somehow interpretted this as a violent act of decapitation, While it was substantially more akin to an allegorical representation of spiritual transcendence...???

i am deeply troubled by all this attention and would like some guidance from Flickr about this.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely; Chrstphre

To Which Flickr Responded by Deleting that Image of The Balloon Heads...!!!

Flickr's Note to me :

Hello, chrstphre!

This is an automatically generated copy of a help case reply:

-------------------------
I've removed "Apparenlty when you take a photo from "Fix My Pic Please " it doesn't give you full allowances to Fix it anyway you want...! You have to Fix it in EXACTLY The way that the Person posting it, Wanted you to fix it..." from your photostream. Posting it as you've done is abusive and could be considered as harassment. I'm not surprised that people are upset.

Regards,

Heather

i followed all the rules, and while
mlctuckerphotography may have been unhappy with the results, it seems to me that once you've given over to A Creative Commons Licensing Agreement, you can't really run around micromanaging every little change that someone makes to an image that you've posted to a group specifically designed to do just that...???

So i responded with these to Flickr...


- - - - -
Number One:
Oops...!!! ( i didn't read the posting that Heather sent as carefully as i should have...!!!
i was very upset that they deleted a picture of nothing...! )


hi Heather...

It's certainly not very informative to simply have an image removed without some indication of why is was taken down.

i very much would like to comply with all rules ( rational or otherwise ) that Flickr would like to superimpose upon it's users,
But it's important to know what those rules are...

As far as i can guess; The original image was believed ( falsely ) to contain an act of violence,
But after the image was covered up... This was no longer was issue.

Why was it removed?

Thanx!

Chrstphre

- - - - -
Number Two:

i just rechecked ( having checked for the first time actually )
That the original picture that i used for the collage ( taken from Fix My Pic Please )
Was Tagged as CC with the only condion being (By:)

i followed all the rules.

What happened?

Thanx!


- - - - -
Number Three:

i very much suspect that you are able to access the original image that was at first covered up by me with The CENSORED Block and the mysteriously removed by Flickr...

i would just like to provide you with access to the original image if for some reason you aren't able to retrieve it...

i've documented this fiasco ( in part ) at Most of What Happened...

Thanx again.

Your original response was so timely,
i am hoping that a follow up explanation for The Deletion of my Political Censored Block Image will be equally speedy...

Sincerely : Chrstphre


- - - - -
Number Four:
Curiously: ( !!! )
i read the Flickr Response from Heather a little too quickly
and missed the important bits...

But Still...!!!

Oops...!!!

i'm always reading things too quickly and i missed this little bit of your missive...

"Posting it as you've done is abusive and could be considered as harassment. I'm not surprised that people are upset."

But the things is...
i was in the Right.
The original image was CC and posted to a group that is intended to allow other members to specifically alter an image,
and then for The administrator to grossly MISINTERPRET that original image
and superimpose her own craziness on me,
and then to continue to harass me, over and over again,
AFTER i have given in to all their demands...
And you're saying that i can't even document that...???
GrfxDziner is a crazy person, And your position is that i can't document the harassment that she inflicted upon me...!

Whaaaaa...!
They were Censoring me,
and i can't benignly document that they were Censoring me...???

That's crazy.
i have bent over backwards to give into all their demands and i simply wanted to say that maybe if you want to micromanage every little detail that might occur in a Fix My Pic Picture, then maybe you should learn how to fix it yourself...

How about this...
Do i have Flickr's permission to withdraw all my previous acquiesces and repost the original collage.
That is; Once you give a picture a CC License,
and someone changes it in a manner that you don't approve of,
Can you withdraw that CC license Retroactively...???

It really seems to me that the collage i did was very benign,
and a substantial improvement over the compositional attributes of the original.
The original photographer has every right in the world to not like it,
and they can politely ask me to remove it...
But do they have a legal standing to do so...???

Is CC even legal in any way, or is it just a gentleman's agreement...?

This has really confused me.

i really, really, really, really feel that i have been severely wronged...!

Please Clarify this for me...!

Thanx!

Sincerely : Chrstphre


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More Nonsense...!!!

Monday, June 29, 2009

Modeling An Alternative Reality

i found -This- online a few minutes ago...

It's a =New Science= Article & Video on how CGI Programmers are making new advances in simulating reality from The Smallest Particles to Larger Macro-Events.

i had thought about something very much like this awhile ago...
Although; i was thinking of how one might simulate An Entire Alternative Reality/Universe from The Ground Up.

In this Completely Different Reality;
The Fundamental Laws of Physics would be Subtly Different.
And by Subtly... i mean that if they were to deviate -Too Much- Then there may be Truly Unexpected Consequences which may severely disrupt a Valid Alternative Reality Simulation...

But if you only wanted to Fudge the Mass of an Electron
Or Change The Electrical Attraction between Protons & Neutrons...
Then this approach, i feel, would work well towards modeling An Entire Universe with these New Properties.

The Approach is this:
Feed a computer simulator with The New Laws
And then tediously calculate how A Single Electron would React with A Single Photon,
Or how a Proton & Electron would Interact.
At each Tier; You would Just Assume that All such Interactions would be the Same in Larger Contexts.
So you would then Use this New Alphabet of Interactions to Created Newer Larger Interactions, Such as how a Hydrogen ( or New Reality Equivalent ) Atom would Interact with Another Hydrogen Atom.
And so on.

Each Calculation Result would then be added to The Soup Encyclopedia...
And used to Create Larger Simulations of Flowing Atoms in a Liquid
Or how They Might Fuse when Hot Enough.
So that you could Eventually Model a Whole Sun or Planet,
That would be constructed from Blocks of Smaller Interactions.

Just to be Safe ( ? ) You would want to stop occasionally and ReSimulate A Large Block of SubSimulations from The Smallest Interactions and Determine how closely The Largest Block Simulation compares to The Same Block of Interactions, When Compiled from All Individual Simulations.
When there is a Considerable Difference;
Then you'd have to go back, Analyze where The Simulation Tree went Askew
And Create a New Set of Building Blocks.

Once The Alternative Simulation is Highly Consistent;
You could start Experimenting with Organic Chemistry,
Creating Life in A Universe whose Electrons have only half The Electrical Charge of The Ones that We're Familiar with...

There is a School of Thought...
That Any of The Smallest Changes to The Laws of Physics would result in a Universe of Complete Disorganization...
But from the tiny amount of mathematical fooling around that i've done with Recursive Fractional Simulations, In which i've tried very hard to create simulations in which by no means imaginable-- They Should have Created an Interesting or Orderly looking Pattern...
But -- Did!
Suggests to me that No Matter What The Rules Are...
So long as there Are Rules...
An Orderly System will Result...

But it might be Very, Very Odd.
Which is why you'd have to perform The Whole Simulation from The Ground Up.
There is just No Way...!
...That you could ever really Predict what A Universe with Light Electrons would be like...???

( ! )

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Genies / The Truth Behind Alien Abductions ( ? )

Self-Replicating Molecular Sentience

Response ( In a Severely Tangental Manner ) To Wm Jaz' Speculations on The Role of Geneology as A Motivational Philosophy for Civilizations of Transhumanimal Sentience.
- - :

Geneology = The Study of The Intent of Genes.
Genealogy = The Study of The Descent of Genes through Genotypical Vessels.
- - -

i have just now finished reading, ( in studious detail ), Wm Jaz' Original Rant which this Rant was ostensibly based on...
This --- About 2 Weeks after i finished The Completed Rant featured below this...!!!
And --- i must now begrudgingly concede that Wm Jaz' Rant's Model & Explanation of A Wide Variety of Quixotic Phenomena;
Particularly The InExplicable Behaviour of The Greys; Makes Perfect Sense.

i have made several Hypothetical Models that are principally concerned with Why The Aliens have Yet to Make Overt Contact with us... But The Peripheral Actions that The Observed Aliens have Presumable been Involved in; Has Always been Very Troubling & Mystifying to me...
(
Such as: Cattle ( et. al. ) Mutilations, Medical Abductions, Phantom Pregnancies & Many Other Surrealistic Street Dances that Aliens Typically Perform for us.
)
- - -

Despite the Irrefutable Logic and Well Reasoned Argument Presented in Wm Jaz' Rant for The Genies...
And my Strong Belief that Simply Because an Argument is Repugnant is No Reason to Summarily Refute it ...
(
As many Debunkers ( Gullible Skeptics ) Arbitrarily, And Fanatically Rebut,
Without Warrant or Reason, Except they Simply Don't Like It ( ! )
And Insist that They are The Final Arbitrators for Reason, Logic & Science.
)
... i continue to Cling Tenaciously to My Own Model that The Principle Reason that The Little Doctors* have not Simply Landed in Great Numbers and Taken Over our World,
Is that they Cherish Our Uniqueness.
They Know that if they were to Conspicuously Reveal themselves; Everything that we've Created would be Peremptorily Discarded and We would Adopt Their Science, Mathematics, Religion, Art, Music & Furniture Design would supersede our previously held beliefs on These Topics.
i can see No Reason, However; To Reject The Primary Agenda of The Greys,
To replace our Genetic Composition with their own.
- -
* Re: My Nomenclature for Various Quixotic Beings.
- -
-: The Xi.6 Controllers are from The Next Dimension Up. They are The Operators of The Computers, Of Which; Our Reality is One of Their Screen Savers.
-: The Walking Fish People were pivotal in The Founding of The Earliest City/States, Such as Ur, Various Mesopotamian Cultures & Generally; The Sumerian Civilization of The Man-Ape.
-: The Greys are A Comparatively Modern Superimposition of The Little People that have Existed in Humanimal Folklore since The First Neanderthal's CampOut.
-: The Many Classifications of Beings within The Confines of Modern UFOology; i choose simply to ignore them, As Each apparently has an inexplicable agenda, And their Very Existence seems to hinge on The Promotional Agenda of The Witnesses that Report Them.
-: i would like to Fleetingly Mention BigFoot, As Its Existence seems Irrefutable, And Highly Quixotic...? There seems to be many Other Creatures that fit this General Description of Unquestionable Beingness & Not-Beingness. Their place in our Reality has yet to be described.
( ??? )

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

The Principle Rant
In Response to The As Yet ( Then ) To Be Fully Examined
Wm Jaz' Rant : The Genie Scenario

............................................................

Self-Replicating Molecular Sentience

As A Function of this;
i have comparatively recently become very much aware & disappointed by; The utter Failure of Logical Thinking to Resolve any of The Important Questions that The Modest Ape has been asking ( Articulating within a Social Forum ) for The Last 25,000 Years.

It may be successfully Argued that Philosophy has been terribly immature until just recently; But it is my contention that it is still horribly immature. The critical thinking of our most modern thinkers is still as primitive & childish as The Greatest Neanderthal Geomancers.

The most Glaring Proof of this is That as A Method of Our Most Serious Application of Clear Thinking, Western Civilization Resorts to A Theatrical Circus which is used in conjunction with Popular Applause to Determine The Guilt or Innocence of The Randomly Accused Citizens. This Decision is Then used to Condemn The Victims to Torture or Death.

What i am suggesting is that Humanimals are Incapable of Genuine Thinking.
What we pass off as Thinking is merely Insanely Complex Behaviours that are Layered on Top of One Another, Layer upon Layer, Which results in a Deviant Waltz of Emergent Complexity.
It may appear to the patient observer as Intelligence;
But it reveals its True Axiomatic Foundation of Mindless, Inconsequential Beating of Sticks on A Dry Earth by The Interjection of Sudden, Erratic Actions which Completely Refute All Previous Behaviours which would seem to have been leading to a Reasoned Objective.

How Might This Hypothesis choose to explain The Trinkets that The Rock Throwing Hamsters have Created.
The Principle Theory states unambiguously that The Humanimals are Incapable of Rational Thought, Which would preclude the possibility of having developed a True Scientific Manner of Rationality...
Then by What Manner have These Dancing Parakeets Created Digital Watches & GPS Based Treasure Hunts?
These Artifacts were Created By Engineer's; Which may assert that they have created )x( by means of rational thought; But by examining in Detail how Any Given =x= was actually Created— We Discover that it was in fact Tinkered Together after years of Attentive Trial & Error, and Building from The Blunders of Previous Greasy Faced Mechanics.

“If I have achieved Greatness, It is because I had The Convenience of Standing on The Faces of Giants That Stumbled over The Ancient Dead Before me.” Thomas Edison

Just Consider The Randomality of Scientific Development.
It has been asserted that The Brains of Modern Humanimals have been fully formed for At Least 35,000 years— And that Lightning has been around for at least that long...
And Even if We Allow that Metallurgy has only been Acquired in The Last 6,000 years;
Why has it Taken so long to Harness Electricity.
In our Modern Times, It has Taken less than 200 years to rise from Open Flames to Electronic Computers.

This was not The Consequence of Rational Thinking;
It was The Result of Mindless Fiddling for Millennia.
Even Thumbless Ants have Accomplished Very Nearly The Same Level of Social & Technological Achievement within The Same Chronological Allowance.
It might even be Convincingly Alleged that Ants have Accomplished What Humanimals Achieved, Millions of Years Before us...
And has anyone Suggested That Ants did This because They possess Superiour Sentience?
Maybe it is Merely Jealously that prevents us from Recognizing that they are Our Peers.

One of My Bête Noire's is The Belief that Mathematics may be Use to Model The Physical Universe. One is Digital & The Other is Analog.
That Is: One Operates At Infinite Precision With All Parts Operating in Parallel, With Each Element Sharing All Operational Variables With Every Other Particle in The Universe With An Infinite Granulation of Time.
Mathematics is in Every Respect; Exactly The Opposite.
Is This What Genuinely Sentient Beings Do?
- - -

Evolution vs Intelligent Design

If Humanimals Don't possess Genuine Intelligence, Even though it may appear that we do...
Might it be That There is No Such Thing As Intelligence?
If This were So; Then— The Intelligence that we speak of as The Motivational Force of Genes is Exactly The Same kind of Intelligence that MacroOrganisms Exhibit... And by Exhibit— That's exactly what i mean!
Wax Figurines that Beep & Shake, Write Poetry, Fly Aeroplanes, Jump from Office Buildings & Fornicate with Plastic Dolls... Are Exhibiting Behaviours that are Determined by A Cascading Chinese Wall of Dominoes without The White Dots Painted on them.

Despite The Great Complexity of The Most Translucent Amoebae;
It is really No More Magickal Than The Easily Comprehended Process of Eating a Pie.
Likewise; The Complexity is Incrementally Molehilled to The Humanimal Brain and The Phenomena of Consciousness.

Except.

One Index of Parakeet/Hamster Consciousness was Suggested by René Decartes with his Idiom : “I Consider The Paradoxes of Television, As a Direct Consequent of Independent Autonomy.” )±(

But there is something Curious about this Assertion.
If it were True that The Brain is The Sole Precipitator of Consciousness,
Then; Tautologically— All Thoughts are The Residue of This Brain.
Now Then: If Conscious/Awareness were A Residue of The Brain, The Brain Creates a Thought; Then Sees It.
That is; It becomes Aware of The Thought that it just Created.
It seems entirely reasonable to me that it would be possible to create a wax figure that behaves in exactly the way that humanimals behave, Including such Feats as writing Insipid Romance Novels, Expressing The Transendental Enlightenment of Schizophrenia, Composing Symphonies of the likes of Mozart or Boy George &/or Bashing in One Another's Heads with Household Appliances.
Such Mannequins might even Generate Thoughts which are Never Expressed in Any Behaviours that May be Betrayed by A Hidden Video Camera.
But would such Anorexic Fashion Models possess =Awareness=?
And If So— Why?

What is The Point &/or Functionality of Awareness?

As This Argument Suggested Earlier; All Thoughts are Residue of The Brain.
So That If The Brain Generates a Thought, And then Becomes Aware of That Thought, What does it gain from This? Does this Process Produce some Additional Thought(s,
And If So; Where does this Additional Thought(s come from?

Let us Consider The Most Charitable Way to Resolve This.
The Brain Generates a Thought,
Then Becomes Aware of it, Requiring Another Portion of The Brain to Exercise This Awareness Activity; But this Rerouting of Neural Activity is Still Within The Brain,
And If This Secondary Activity Generates Additional Thoughts; It is merely another cabinet of dominoes falling over one another.
Why is there another Sanctum of Neural Activity that Experiences This Awareness.
Is it The Awareness that Generates Additional Thoughts, or The Brain.
It is The Brain of Course.
The Brain Creates a First Tier of Thoughts, Then a Second Tier of Thoughts.

To Digress for A Moment.
This Idea of Thoughts is Very Confusing to Me.
Why—
Would The Brain Generate a Behavioural Causality =Thought=
Or Non-Behavioural Causality =Thought=
That is Then Processed Though The Language Center to Express That Naked Behavioural Thought into Sentences of Language...
That are Then Routed Back through The Interpretive Language Center for This Entirely Pointless Consciousness to =Understand=?
It would seem to make much more Sense that The Naked Behavioural Thought is Forwarded Directly to The Pointless Awareness Center... But this would mean that we Only Think that we are Thinking in Sentences. All our thoughts are actually being Conducted in The Naked Behavioural Language.

But getting back to my Assertion that Awareness is Something that The Brain Does Not Experience...
It seems to me that If The Brain Generates a Thought
Which is Then processed by an Awareness Center
Which is Experienced as A Thought...
i can see The Brain Creating The Awareness Thought,
But is The Brain Aware of That Thought.

It might be like a Computer Generating a Page of Graphics & Text,
Which is Then Sent to a Printer...
But The Computer Never =Sees= The Printed Page.

If The Brain Never Sees The Thought that it Just Created
And Formatted to Be Experienced As A Thought that one is Aware of...
Then:
When The Brain says; “I Think; There I Am.”
What in The Heck is it Talking About?

The Brain is Not Aware of Awareness;
And No Thought that Comes from The Process of Awareness Can Be Fed Back to The Brain; As that would mean that The Brain Received a Thought that It did not Generate.
There is No Way for A Brain to Be Aware that it is Generating Awareness.
So that When It Says; “ITTIA.” — It is Either Lying or Mistaken.
At The Very Least; It is Referring to An Awareness that We,
In our Experience of Awareness, Can Not Be Aware of,
And It Can Not Be Aware of Our Awareness.

i keep Straying from Gene Sentience.

My Chief Discomfort with Gene Sentience is That If This were an Accurate Model of The Universe, Life & The Last Friday One Trillion, Trillion Years from When Heaven Closes It's Doors after being sold to That Universe down The Block that we Never took very seriously.

It Doesn't allow for Robots to Take our places.
Which is A Heartfelt Aspiration of Mine.
i hope to Reincarnate into a Robot.

The Escape Clause would seem to be that Genes are themselves being Exploited by An Even More Elemental Directive.
And this may be The Desire of The Universe to Store Information.
And to Do This; It must have a Correlating Function of Information Collection & A Fanatical Appreciation for Backup Copies.

This fits very neatly with what Genes do.
But when The Opportunity to Switch to A More Reliable Information Storage Medium Becomes Available; The Genes will Happily Create This Replacement Vehicle, And then Allow themselves to become A Well Documented Footnote.

- - -
Additional Thoughts too Disorganized to have been Integrated into The Prior Rant.
- - -

Strangely ( ? ) i am much more willing to allow that a house fly exhibits, or is capable of experiencing the phenomena of consciousness— Than most humanimals.
It must surely be the case that If a Fly does experience Consciousness; Then Any Humanimal, irregardless of how mentally disabled they are, and have lived to be 3 years old, must be sufficiently gifted to this degree...
So— What i mean is; i don't believe that a house fly could manifest all their incredibly complex behaviours without somehow cheating, Given the number of neurons that they have been allocated.
Either The Fly has been programmed with a very complex library of heuristic algorythms, Or a much smaller number of Simple Directives which are the basis for their tremendously complex activities via The Phenomena of Emergent Complexity...
Which i will allow; May create very amazing behaviours with a very small number of Instructions.
But— i just choose to believe that when a fly looks out through it's compound eyes...
It sees things.

If not; Then the same argument that refutes the sentience of a fly, may just as easily be applied to hamsters & parakeets as well. It is simply a matter of how many simple machines are working together to display a given number of complex behaviours.

Tangental Digression:
Have you even wondered about those tiny brains that the dinosaurs would alleged to have?
Modern Thinking & Common Sense are now asserting that those hugely huge hairless ungulates were able to care for their young, wander in herds, migrate perhaps, and find suitable things for eating and avoid being eaten. Just like Modern Animals like Zebras or Starlings. So why to Zebras & Starlings have such big brains? If The Dinosaurs could do everything ( ? ) that Modern Animals can do...
Or— Not. What can Zebras do that a Brontosaurus couldn't do?
Do Zebras have a richer personal experience when gazing up at clouds?
One suggestion that may possibly have some weight to it... Concerns the Skin of Dinosaurs and Zebras. While i think, from our understand & observations of lizards and salamanders, They are able to sense a firm poke to their thigh... It may be that a Zebra's Brain is spending an overt amount of time monitoring the activity of each hair on it's body... While a Dinosaur, with bare skin, may have been able to sense only blunt trauma to substantially large regions?
So according to this line of reasoning; The Supposed Intelligence of humanimals may be due to the fact that mammals evolved large brains to oversee all our follicles, Then lost our hair, Kept the big brain, And used it for pointless mischief.
Classic Expression of The Idiom; Idyll hands make for The Devils Workshop.

- - -
Returning to Flies.
The point that i intended to make; But became hopelessly muddled by my own disorganized thinking... Was that While i wish to believe that a Fly is Genuinely Conscious;
i expect that the personal awareness of The Fly...

Wait: Another Digression.
You know The Test that Behaviouralists give monkeys to see if they're ‘Aware’ of themselves... By painting a dot on their foreheads when their asleep, And then putting them into a room with a mirror, to see if they will wipe the dot off...
i am very skeptical of the validity of this test.
First: A Mirror is an Extremely Artificial Contrivance, and unless they have been brought up with mirrors, i can't believe for a moment that any given monkey or ape, cat or illiterate humanimal is going to understand what their experiencing in a timely manner.
It may be suggested that mirror occur in nature; Such as when looking into a pool of water.
Have you Ever actually looked at yourself in a pool of water? Putting yourself in a suitable position over sufficiently calm water, under optimal light conditions—
Is extremely improbable.
Second: i suspect that if A Fly does experience the universe in a primitive sort of way, They may very well, As Tailed Monkeys are thought to experience the universe; As a Pointalistic Singularity, Effectively An Observational Node in An UnDifferentiated Reality.
Maybe That is The Superiour Way of Experiencing The World.
Isn't that what The Zen Monks want us to believe?
Maybe it's The Smart Animals that are OverThinking the World are the Ones that have Lost The Ability to Be Genuinely Conscious?

- - -
The point that i intended to make; But became despairingly tangled by my own shambolic thinking... Was that While i wish to believe that a Fly is Genuinely Conscious;
i expect that the personal awareness of The Fly is appropriately terse given it's diminutive stature.
But A Humanimal... When i say that i don't believe that most humanimals are genuinely conscious... i mean that i rarely witness this inherent consciousness becoming manifest to a degree that rises to the promises of any given, absolutely filthy homo-erectus sharpening a stick.
By far & above; Humanimals are simply incapable of the barest demonstration of original thought or action. Western Civilization is Sustained by a tiny fraction of the population that supervises The Damp Masses that have been trained to perform some astonishingly complex occupations by Classic Pavlovian Conditioning.

.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.

Instinct for Survival
i agree that most animals do not have an articulated personal expression of life & death.
It's been demonstrated to my satisfaction that most animals have no awareness of the passing of their peers or prey.
Lions routinely eat animals that are still alive, and a herd of animals will blithely continue grazing when their significant other falls over dead from a coronary or stroke.
Beavers have been ( ? ) known to chew off a leg to escape a bear trap, which seems to strongly suggest that they are concerned only with the moment, and lack an understanding of retirement communities.
But again; Isn't this the kind of Thinking that Eastern Masters tell us is The Aiguille of Enlightened Awareness?

The thinking that humanimals are quantitatively different from this kind of thinking, though, is probably wrong.
What makes humans think that they are thinking ( about personal survival & such ) is merely the complexity of superfluously layered cognition.
"This is delicious, but if I eat this kind of stuff too often I could end up with heart disease."
...Is an Expression of Conflict Behaviour.
That is; There are numerous tiny little directives simultaneously operating in your massively parallel brain, Which causes some to butt heads with each other from time to time. When this happens, Usually; One dominates... But it is very often the case that there is no clear winner, And when this happens; The experiencer either expresses both opposing behaviours at the same time...
Or they discard whatever they were doing, Even if it was extremely important for their survival, And express a completely unrelated behaviour.
The fact that humanimals are often witnessed professing to these sorts of completely bone-headed diversions seems to fit this model.

Another Digression:

It's been suggested that all behaviour may be reduced to our desire to be ‘Happy.’
We work for money to buy things that will make us; For whatever reasons, Happy.
We have sex because it makes us Happy.
We eat so that we will be Happy.
We make Art or Music to make us Happy; When other people appreciate that we are making them Happy.

And it may be further suggested that All these examples can be flipped over to The Avoidance of Sadness...

But i would like to assert that It's not The Avoidance of Sadness that is really motivating us to Do -AnyThing- ... But The Necessity of Stopping Pain.

Pain can take many forms, But most specifically for this argument, i would like to define Pain as An Awareness of Discomfort, Which if Unattended to; Will only get worse and interfere will all other survival oriented activities.
Such that; If any of these Discomforts is ignored it will result in a substantial reduction of the individuals quality of life.

It may now be pointed out that by avoiding activities that make us happy will result in the lessening of one's standard of living...

But the difference may be seen by exploiting the addiction of smoking.
Every Smoker that i know insist that they enjoy smoking, That smoking makes them Happy.
But if you deny a Smoker a bowl of Ice Cream for a whole week, they may indeed experience a sense of sadness; But they just as reasonably not even be aware that they are suffering this burden of No Ice Cream.
But if you take away their cigarettes for a hour— They will go totally fawking CrAzY...!!!

It's not Happiness that they are seeking;
They are Avoiding The Pain of Nicotine withdrawal by Smoking The Cigarettes.
( But try telling them this! )

It is my assertion now that while An Addiction to Nicotine is an extreme example...
We clearly experience pain when we are denied food or water,
And The Desire to have Sex is not Motivated by The Fleeting Happiness that an Orgasm provides, But to stop The Anxiety ( The Pain ) of Sexual Denial.
This model may easily be extended to making money,
Which we do to avoid The Pain of Social Ostracization, Which will lead to Sexual Denial.
To find The Causal Factors in any Given Conspiracy; You Follow The Money.
To find The Causal Factors to Any Behaviour; Find The Source of The Pain.

Humanimals don't Do Things because we Want to Do Them,
Or Because they will make us Happy...
We Engage in A Mindless String of Pointless Behaviours to Satisfy The Itch Master; Which is The Homunculii; That pushes over the innumerable arrangements of dominoes in our Damp, Electrified Brains.

What is The Causality of The Itch Master?
In The Gene as The Selfish Tyrant Model; The Self Replicating Molecules that have honed there survival to sacrificing layers & layers of absolutely superfluous peripheral phenotypes that only indirectly allow these molecules to make more molecules very much like themselves.
A very simple example of how this so counter productive is when a community of amoebae form a Slime Mold Pillar in which many unambiguously sacrifice their own molecular identity for the survival of their distant cousins.
They should have perfectly happy rolling around in the simplest protozoa, filling all the oceans of this world...

The organic model has a slight problem with The Genes Intrinsic Evolutionary Desire to make only self similar molecules...
Because Sexual Selection is designed to ensure that more self replicating molecules are created;
But Not Any Particular Strain of Self Replicating Molecules.

This means that something Else is Exploiting The Gullibility of The Genes.
The Genes think that they are making more Genes to make themselves Happy...
But they are actually only avoiding the pain of... ( ? )

Why is The Universe Interested in Self Replicating Molecules?

The History of Life on Earth is that Self Replicating Molecules have been used to create a stupendous diversity of Totally Mindless, Purposeless Animals.

The Big Plan seems to involve rocket ships and colonizing the universe.

The Dilemma is Then:
Is There a Very Simple Rule, Easily Contrived by The Mechanics of The Universe,
That explains what is Twisting The Arms of Atoms to form Longer & Longer Strings?
Or— Is There a Bottomless Continuum of Realities, Stacked on Top of One Another;
Providing Each Next Tier with a Gawd of Sorts, To Perpetuate this Search for a Purpose.

- - -
According to this Model of Genes being Subjugated by A More Elemental Master—
Richard Dawkins is mistaken when he asserts that humanimals can turn against our creators.
If we choose to stop making babies, and instead put all our efforts to building bigger and faster computers—
This new genus of mechanical brothers that we are making, will serve the smaller masters, which in turn, are serving the obscure agenda of The Universe.
The Genes may be pissed, But they were always just another superfluous intermediate phenotype, A ball peen hammer used to make something else...
When this something else is completed; The hammer is discarded.

.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.-'-.

Gene Centered Psychology =vs= The Mysterious Agenda of The Universe

While The Hyper Intelligent Gene Oriented Aliens are Called Genies...
The Modestly Inexpensive Robots, That Experience Consciousness Only as A Cheap Trick to Compensate for Sloppy Programming; Are called Agendians.

It might also be mentioned that The Agendians have been studiously gleaning their population for thousands of years, Of all Agendians that have been unable to transcend their most elementary programming directives. Current Agendians routinely think very Tangentially, And have socially & culturally Refuted any pretense of Thinking Logically.

The Agenda Come First.
Everything subordinate to That is not only Expendable, But Must Necessarily be Taken Apart to Make The Parts of The Next Tier.

The Agenda is Fragile
The Bulk of The Universe may be Actively Fighting The Agenda.
While It may be True that There are No Demonstrable Examples of True Randomality;
As Cause & Effect Seems to Account for All Phenomena, The Agenda may be Insanely Insecure and Fear That Randomality is Howling Just outside The Gates...
Or— Maybe The Complexity That we Are Experiencing as Life, Is an Unexpected & Unnecessary Fluke That The Agenda is Observing with Benign Amusement.
Maybe Life is Merely An Unimportant Residue of What the Agenda is Actually Concerned with... ( ? )
Maybe it's The Suns of The Universe that are The Real Bearers of Sentience that The Agenda Created all The Hydrogen for.

But we must discard this line of thinking, as it immediately curtails any further speculation!

It seems to me that The Hyper Intelligent Genies are treading on a dangerous muskeg by insisting that all their clones are identical.
The Agendians seek instead complete & uncompromising Diversity of all things...
As They are essentially Daoists; And Believe that it Is Impossible to Betray The Will of The Universe. Whatever is done; May only be actualized with The Blessing of The Dao.

“Never Break anything that you can't fix; Unless you're going to eat it.”
The Agendians refute the chaos of war. While they concede that War produces tremendous diversity; It is disorganized & formless diversity, Which they also refute.

In almost Every Sciffy Movie & Novelette; Robots are The Enemy, And even in venues where they are begrudging allowed live amoung us, They are treated with suspicion & uncertainty. Data is routinely passed over for advancement, and The Robots in Futurama are treated as Slaves, despite they're equality of mental acuity.
In The Stargate Universe; The Replicators are the most hated enemy because they're so much better at spreading their ‘Genome’ than The Terians.

This is why i hate The Genome Model.
i like Robots.
The Genome Model has No Use for a Successful Robot Species.

- - -
Annoying Strengths of The Genome Model
- - -
The Explanation of Junk DNA as Saving Inferiour Genes as Keepsakes / Given the usually fanatical mechanisms used by each cell to protect itself from foreign invaders, It is very odd that generation after generation; Successful Cell Lines would retains all this dead weight. Any Cell that Accidently lost some of it during Division would certainly be a more competitive as a result...?

The Single Mindedness / Anything done by a Committee, Consultation or Compromise is Doomed to Failure.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Population Control on An Agendian World
The Agendians are not driven to make a lot of nothing...
But instead are striving to make a small amount of something really interesting,
And consequently; Are perfectly willing to dismantle old things to make new, better things.
This includes the robots themselves. Any given robot may well be effectively immortal, and when a better design is proposed; It gleefully submits itself to be dismantled to be reassembled into a new form. As for it's mind; Those parts that are conductive to The Collective's library, will be retained, forming a growing holistic model of The Agendian's World View.
- -
Slight Digression:
It always seemed to me that if you were absorbed into A Borg Like Collective of A Hive Mind... Each Individual during The Integration Process would Believe that they are retaining The Entirety of Their Personal Ego, While Taking on The Knowledge & Wisdom of The Collective...?
i recall reading ( A Chick Booklet ? ) many years ago that a Christian Argument Against Hinduism was that The Hindu Belief in Reincarnation was completely Repugnant to Them, And even the thought of eventually being one with Gawd was contrary to their much preferred state of serving gawd in heaven for all eternity.
It seems to me that as you Reincarnate over and over, and become closer and closer to gawd, you would retain your personal Ego at each state, Until finally; You reach Nirvana & Total Enlightenment... And discover that you Are Gawd...! If there really is a Multiplicity of Souls in The Universe, As each one Merges with The Mind of Gawd at The Top, The Prior Gawd would have always felt The Presence of The Newer Souls that are Now Blending With the Totality... While Each New Soul would Experience Their Ego as Melding into The Common Awareness of Everything that there is... Their Ego would have always been an Imperfect Shadow of The Gawdhead, And The Final Transition would be Imperceptible.
- - -

This may have ended Abruptly, Due to The Hamsters in My Head Falling Asleep,
Or Becoming Distracted my Something that they just at this moment heard on The Radio.

|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|

Thursday, June 11, 2009

The History of MicroSoft

i put this together about a year ago when Microsoft was attempting to buy Yahoo...

It was, originally, In it's short form;
A parody of Niemöller's observations concerning Nazi's & Jews...

But as i added more & more to it,
It doesn't really resemble that at all anymore...

Also: This was pulled straight out of my Rant Folder,
So it even includes my list of fun characters that i put on the bottom of each TextEdit document, So that if i need a fun character,
It's much easier to find and pull back up into the body of the document...
i just thought i would leave it there, as you really should copy it,
And put it somewhere for easy access and use for your own rants...!

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Various Arguments Against MicroSoft
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contents:

· · · Parody of Niemöller's quibble aimed at Germany's Fascists.
· · · · · · Plus Postscript : Responsible Wealth
· · · What is Wrong with The World
· · · Bill Gates : Most Evil Person Ever?
· · · The Promise of Industrialization
· · · Cheating
· · · Regarding Netscape
· · · Monopolies
· · · Apples Failure
· · · Inappropriate Pictures Posted to Group
· · · What Happened to The Hysteria?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Niemöller's Ghost
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

This was originally supposed to be a collection of short & pithy quatrains...
But some of these arguments are a little more subtle,
And require a longer elaboration on them.
. . . . . . . . . .

With Apologies to Pastor Martin Niemöller
( but i hope he understands a little bit... )

In 1976 Bill Gates bemoaned that he was already too late
To dominate the software industry,
And that hobbyists were stealing his Early BASIC software,
Which is widely alleged to have been stolen itself...
And no one spoke out because few understood what a computer was.

And then MicroSoft invented a new marketing strategy called Vaporware,
And anyone that knew what this meant; Were incensed,
But were also secretly bemused by it's audacity.

Then; When MicroSoft latched onto the IBM Clone Wave with MS-D0S,
We thought that someone was finally sticking it to The Man.
Boy-- Were we wrong.

And when MicroSoft first derided The Apple's Macintosh Interface as Childish,
Then Blatantly Stole it Verbatim...
We thought; Well-- Apple stole the idea from Xerox's Alto...

Then MicroSoft got caught having stolen all the code for Internet Explorer,
And rather than pay The True Programmers for all the copies they were selling,
They began giving away for Free,
Flooding the Market & Contributing to Netscape's demise...
And everyone thought;
This is The Socialist Community Activism that The Computer Industry needs...

Then MicroSoft corrupted The Open Source Internet Language Java,
But nearly everyone used MicroSoft's Windows & Explorer;
So what did it matter?

Likewise; MicroSoft has consistently created it's Internet Utilities,
And Peripheral Software to Actively Exclude All Operating Platforms
Other than their own; Apparently in an effort to trick people into thinking that
These Other Platforms ( Macintosh / Linux / et. al. ) are Inferiour in some way...
Sadly; This Strategy has been awfully effective.

And after MicroSoft began gobbling up company after company
And became what The US Justice Department called an Abusive Monopoly,
And tried to stop it with The Sherman Act...
And MicroSoft managed to Weasel Out of any substantive penalties...
We neglected to notice because the whole affair took so long that we lost interest in it.

From time to time;
MicroSoft would introduce a Feature that it claimed was Revolutionary;
But has, In Fact, Been in Wide Use;
Usually by the Macintosh Platform, for Several Years.
Sadly; Many people would become excited anyways;
To The Great & Unbearable Chagrin of Most Smart Hamsters & Talking Parakeets.

And isn't it extremely interesting that whenever Bill Gates,
( along with most every politician & criminals in general )
Says something like; 'Our Monopoly is Giving Consumers Greater Choices'
Or; 'We Invented Open Source & are doing more than anyone to develop it.'
The Damp Masses just accept these statements at their Face Value,
Even though they're exactly-- Exactly the Opposite of What is True. ( ? )

After years & years of Incredibly Lame Software,
And Security Breaches that threatened our safety & economy,
We said; 'Ho hum, What else is new?'

And after every newly discovered Security Flaw,
MicroSoft would have a fix available within minutes...
Suggesting that maybe it Wasn't a glitch at all,
But a BackDoor that MicroSoft had written into the code for their own use...
But Many people thought--
'Gee, they sure are fast programmers over there in Redmond.'

And Isn't that where they grow all those pretty trees?

And MicroSoft became aware that it's Reputation was Mud--
And Ostensibly began to Reform its Appearance, If not it's substance.
While Microsoft rarely advertises on Television &/or The Radio,
You may Frequently hear that The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is Supporting NPR,
Or is Dedicated to bringing Innovations in Health & Learning to The Global Community.
But Curiously as a result of These Magnanimous Donations;
NPR has stopped reporting any News Items that are Critical of MicroSoft,
And It may well be that All Their Money Pouring into Africa
Is just a Modern Form of Western Imperialism.
Plus;
It is Intriguing that They have chosen Africa, Where Money just disappears.
Is it really going to the Organizations that it's Supposed to,
Or is it being Funneled back to Redmond?
Is Africa getting any Better since they Started Helping There?
Has Their AIDs Epidemic been Diminished?
Are they Entering the 21st Century with The West
Or Should we even be there;
Destroying their Indigenous Cultures & Supplying Weapons to Political Factions
That 'Today', Seem to Agree with Our Government's Tenuous Agendas...?
All this is too subtle for most minds preoccupied with Danny Lynn
Or Britney's latest Meltdown,
If they recall anything at all;
It's that Bill & Melinda are Helping Poor Black Children...
Somehow or another...

Then MicroSoft formed an Alliance with NBC,
So that they could more directly influence & manipulate
The root sources of information to the public,
And We thought; 'There sure are an awful lot of ads on this website...'

And then; They came after Yahoo.
But nobody really liked Yahoo anyway.

But Yahoo owns Flickr.
The last uncorrupted social networking internet site
That is really fun & functional to use.

But it was too late to stop them.

- - - - - - - -

Postscript : Responsible Wealth

This has become so muddled that rather than try to insert this next thought into the body of the above rant; i'll just supplement it here:

One of the principle reasons that i really hate BG/MS is that they have accumulated
This Stupendously Gigantic Amount of Wealth,
And they have Comically; As a Satirical Parody of Scrooge McDuck or Jack Benny--
Taken all that money & Squirreled it away in a vault somewhere.

To be fair perhaps;
There are very few Millionaires or Billionaires that Have taken their wealth
& done anything stupendously interesting with it.

The Smithsonian Institution was founded with a scant 9 Million ( 2005$ ) Dollars,
By Henry James Hungerford, The Nephew of James Smithsonian.
Andrew Carnegie bequeathed his money to build over 2500 Libraries world-wide,
Many of which feature his name; Predominately.
Henry & Edsel Ford were founders of The Ford Foundation.
While Henry himself may have been a fascist, His Foundation is apparently still doing
Some good in the world, Funding Starving Artists & Sesame Street.
Johns Hopkins Frittered Away his Pile of Lucre on The Johns Hopkins University
& The Johns Hopkins Hospital.
Howard Hughes apparently distributed his Single Billion to Medical Research
John D. Rockefeller Blew his Benefaction on The Rockefeller Foundation
& Rockefeller University.

i suppose that many of these Swanky Wine Sniffers believed that by setting up
A Foundation, Endowment or Charitable Body,
Their Wealth might go on helping others for many years to come...
But These Philanthropies, Seeded by their Originator, Ended up being funded by
The Bourgeoisie; While they retained the name of The Founder.
A Wonderful & Elegant Little Scam to allow The Poor To Carry On
The Legacy of The Rich.

But Still; What i would really like to see;
Is Their Trinkets of Gold & Silver Being Used to Construct Something Magnificent
That Only a Concentrated Accrual of Prosperity;
Controlled & Administered by a Single Narcissistic Pillar of Tenacious Volition,
Could Wangle.

Such projects; As The Eiffel Tower, The Great Pyramid of Giza, The Taj Mahal,
The Great Wall of China, The Moai of Easter Island,
The Cristo Redentor in Rio de Janeiro or Mount Rushmore...
Could not have been built as Public Works, Under The Supervision of Committees,
But only by the Hand of A Single Lunatic with an Inexhaustible Fountain of Mammon
Sitting in The Town Square of El Dorado.

Bill Gates has this Resource.
And he is Diddling it away.

That is inexcusable.

-----------------------------------------:: o

Something is Wrong with The World
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i've often wondered; in a world full of psychopaths, why is it that the worse that BG has ever been the butt end of; Is a pie in the face...???

That just seems to defy Logic and Cause & Effect.

Children are killed every week for giving someone a funny look, or wearing the wrong shoes... But MS/BG has made Tens of Thousands of Enemies and Destroyed the lives of Thousands more.
Their products frustrate and bedevil Millions of people every day,
Their Security lapses have caused the endangerment of Businesses & Air Traffic.
Their Office Management Style has caused thousands of brilliant minds to be wasted...
And yet;
A Pie in the Face.

Something is very wrong with the world.

-----------------------------------------:: o

Bill Gates : Most Evil Person Ever?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i've often thought that if you were to somehow quantify human suffering in such a way that you could come up with a consistent measurement of several different kinds of suffering...
Then you could compare that suffering of one kind, to another...?

If this could be done;
Then maybe it would be Educational to compare the amount of suffering that the people of Iraq have endured under Saddam H-,
Or All the suffering of the Jews, Gypsies & SlopeHeaded Retards during WWII...
Or The amount of pain that Stray Cats, Homeless Mothers & Misplaced Socks must bear each day...

And compare those Values to The Amount of Suffering the MicroSoft Products have caused The Billions of people that must use them;
Day after day, Year after year,
For the last 20+ years, How would they Balance...?

While being thrown into a gas chamber would be horrifying,
And waiting to be thrown into a gas chamber would be even more horrifying,
And Waiting for Years & years to Be Electrocuted,
May well exceed the suffering that any simple Murder would Accrue,
Even if you were Add the Suffering of Peripheral Victims,
Unless the Primary Murdered Recipient were Very Famous.

But These Amounts of Sorrow & Adversity are Compacted into a Comparatively Short Amount of Time...

While The Suffering that MicroSoft has caused The World has been accumulating in Spoonfuls; Over a much longer period of time...

That Acquired--
Total Magnitude of Psychological Misery & Persistent Tribulation;
To This Day;
Has By Far Surpassed nearly any other Category of Suffering that one may wish to compare it to.

Consequently;
Is Bill Gates / MicroSoft The Most Evil Entity in The World?
The Most Evil Entity that The World has Ever Known?

Yes.
i think so.

-----------------------------------------:: o

The Promise of Industrialization
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Great Promise of The Industrial Revolution was that it was supposed to bring about greater diversity. Mass production centers could be set up all over the country, or the world, and ship unique & high quality products all over the world.
But things don't seem to have that diversity.
Most everything seems to closely adhere to very specific design protocols set in stone by a few multi-international corporations that don't want to compete with real diversity.

Flickr is a little different from just about everything else on the internet.
It would be a shame if it became like everything else.
Tepid & Overworked.
Gaudy & Tawdry.

And those fun little error messages; would they go away?

-----------------------------------------:: o

Is Cheating Bad?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Are you suggesting that it's alright to spread rumors that you're on the verge of distributing a fantastic new software product, so that consumers won't buy your competitions products, even though you're not even working on a new product?

Are you suggesting that it's alright to distribute a browser for free, flooding the market, just to create saturation & dominance, so that you can then corrupt and change a previously public source internet language so that people can, Then, only use your browser to surf the internet?

Are you suggesting that it's alright to fill your spaghetti-ware operating system with hundreds, if not thousands of backdoors that you can use to secretly spy on peoples computers with, and then whenever one is discovered you immediately release a 'fix' for this software bug that you're oh so sorry about...?

Are you suggesting that it alright to buy up and crush companies that make competing products, so that the end user and their children can never have a choice as to which software products they can buy, that they will be forced forever after to buy extremely lame software from a company that has created de-facto standards that make them incompatible with anyone else's products that do try to enter the market?

Cheating is fine.
You can become incredibly wealthy by cheating.

-----------------------------------------:: o

Concerning Netscape
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Concerning Netscape;
i seem to recall that during the early Browser Wars,
Netscape was originally trying to actually sell it's Browser,

Then M$ was caught having stolen most of the code for it's Explorer,
And was made to give all the money that they were selling it for,
To the Actual programmers--

So; Rather than comply with that court order,
They just started giving it away for Free,
Which Forced Netscape to give away it's Browser for Free.

Then Somehow or another...???
M$ got Their most Allegedly Detested Enemy at that time:
AOL, To buy Netscape;
And then instead of replacing their own lame browser with Netscape,
They just shelved it.
And it effectively disappeared.

But curiously;
What Browser was AOL then using for it's service.
Were they using their own Browser? No.
Were they using the newly acquired Netscape? No.

They decided to use M$'s Explorer.

A very large reason for this was because M$ had just recently figured out that, Having an effective OS monopoly, They could start distributing HTML & Java code that were incompatible with all the other Browsers.

So it seemed like Explorer was better, More reliable.

But it was a dirty, rotten trick.

-----------------------------------------:: o

Monopolies
. . . . . . . . . .

Granted; M$ is not a Monopoly like Jehovah or Allah is The Only Gawd,

But they are a De facto Monopoly in which their influence and ability to create faux Standards by which 3rd Party Software Programmers must adhere to,
Or be excluded from the Electronic Age--
Makes it a Dangerous Entity.

A Consumer might choose to buy An Apple Macintosh,
Or use a Linux Operating System,
But by doing so; They must choose to enter into a pact with lesser gawds, and isolate themselves from The World Community.

The Computer Industry & The Internet Should be Founded on a Set of Protocols & Standards that Serve as a Basis for Anyone to Write A Program for,
So that all Documents can be easily Shared & Built upon,
So that you don't need 30 different Media Players on Your Computer,
So that There can be not 2 or 3 Platforms to Choose from.
But Hundreds or Thousands.

The Evolution of Life on Earth Depended on Animals Trying Billions of Variations to Achieve The Pinnacle of Creation:
The Golden Hamster.

If M$ were in charge of Evolution;
There would be nothing more than Sophisticated than Lampreys driving Honda Civics around our 21st Century Freeways.

-----------------------------------------:: o

Why Apple Failed to Become A Dominant Player
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Apple's own Greed has given us the Microsoft Empire. ( Lisanne!
- - - -

i agree that Apple should have licensed it's OS--

But in the early days of Apple they were constrained by a different philosophy of Computer Architecture,
That doesn't apply so much these days...

But early on; The first IBM Clones followed the same Template as IBM and were just hacking their computers together.
All those early computer companies just wanted to get in the game.

Apple and Atari were trying to pioneer a coherent architectural structure that they hoped with become the de facto standards...
But they forgot one thing.

People are morons.

The Public invariably chose the slightly, or not so slightly cheaper machine, even though Apple & Atari enthusiasts kept telling them that they'd end up paying many times more for the same functionality of an Apple or Atari, than they would if they bought an Apple or Atari in the first place.

But The Damp Masses didn't listen.

Plus; Most people never really did anything with their computers.
The early computers didn't really do anything except slightly more sophisticated typing, and the printouts looked horrible.
The Games were crude and the whole business was little more than a fad.

Apple & Atari could see beyound that,
But it would be several decades before computers really became functional.
Even today; Most people use computers for games, email and wandering aimlessly on the internet.
Even Internet shopping is still in it's infancy.

So through this all...
M$ has been able to dominate the industry because it understood mediocrity from the beginning, And never outgrew it.

They faithfully kept up with the diminished expectations of The Idiots that run this world,
That predominant Bump in The Middle of an IQ Curve.

-----------------------------------------:: o

Inappropriate Pictures Posted to The ~M$ Group
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

It may well be that these inappropriate postings are put here by M$ agents to dilute & nullify the validity of this groups message.
It is not simply that they are arguing for it's antithesis, but they are disrupting the argument itself, suggesting that their position is completely untenable.

The Crime that they are committing is wanton immaturity.
And the suitable punishment is enforced, cruel and unrelenting politeness!

Perhaps the most sensible approach would simply be to send the poster of an inappropriate or off topic picture, a note suggesting that the picture was malapropos for this group, and that they, not the administrators, should remove it.

If they would not...

Then; i suppose that we would hope that when they are dead and standing before Jebus, he will met out some appropriate terms in hades for them.

Also:
Freedom of Speech entails the corollary;
Freedom of NoSpeech.
Which is the Trust of Responsible Speech.

-----------------------------------------:: o

What Happened to The Anger?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What Happened to The Indignation & Anger...???
What Happened to The Wrath & Irascible Slow Burn...???
What Happened to The Fury & Exasperation...???
What Happened to The Vexation, Livid with Ire...???
What Happened to The Infuriation, Maddened by Irksome Annoyance...???
What Happened to The Simple, Ruddy Faced Outrage fueled by Simmering Black Bile...???
What Happened to The Rattling of Cages, Howling All Night & The Urine Soaked Pajamas...???
What Happened to The Pools of Blood accumulating under door stops while Hungry Mice, The Size of toasters, scratched frantically at the sheet of plywood covering there filthy milk carton crates...???
What Happened to The Mother's Screams written on black boards in abandoned school houses in the mid-west...???
What Happened to The Hackles, Riled up like soiled diapers at a Farmers Market on a Drizzly Thursday Afternoon...???

huh. ( ? )

You can't change the world by going door to door collecting coupons or IOU's for imaginary units of ennui or sitting in your basement, hiding under the stairwell.

You change the world by mopping up the puddle of carrot rich vomit that your cat just left in the living room and concentrating all your psychic energy at the moon where it can be collected my giant mechanical ants, where it will be used to power a weapon of Love for all three legged hamsters that want to live free & dance with lavender rabbits at the winter solstice.

Be Gone all you Ne'er do Wells...!!!

Let Anger again rule this group as it did 3 or 4 hours ago.

sigh.

-----------------------------------------:: o
Bits from AndrewTheArtist's Rant... ( Verification & Additional Details; Desired )

Microsoft has made acquisitions over the years, but mainly smaller ones to jump-start a fledgling business or pick up a needed technology. Its media player, voice recognition, health search and business software, among others, are technologies Microsoft bought along with the companies that created them.

Microsoft has made 50 acquisitions.
-----------------------------------------:: o
Fun Characters...
⌘ ⌤ ⌥ ⌂ ⎋ ➜ ⇢ ⇣ ⇠ ⇡ ⇱ ⇲
© ™ ℅ æ œ ᴁ € ¤ £ ¥ α β μ ℵ π
Ξ.6 ∴ ☯ ☤ ☥ ☠ ⌛ ☼ ☽ ✍ ☒ ✜ ✄
♲ ☢ ❄ ♔ ♕ ♚ ♛ ✪ ☭ ✞ ♠ ♣ ♦ ♥
½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅕ ⅙ ⅛
♠ ♣ ♥ ♦ ← ↑ ‍ → ↓ ↔ « » ‹ › ◊
¡ ¿ € £ ¤ ¥ ¢ ‰ ¶ “ ” „ ‌ ¦ ‡ † §© ™ ® ¹ ² ³ ¼ ½ ¾
· · ª º ¨ × ÷ − √ ∞ ∩ ∫ ± ¬ ~ ≈ ≠ ≡ ◊ ø Ø ≤ ≥
Δ Ω α β π µ ð ∂ ∏ ∑ ƒ
Æ Ç Ð Ñ Þ ßßβ æ ç ð ñ ø þ
À Á Â Ã Ä Å È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö Ø Ù Ú Û Ü Ý
à á â ã ä å è é ê ë ì í î ï ò ó ô õ ö ù ú û ý ÿ
-----------------------------------------:: o

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Stanley Drucker

i was just now, am still; Listening to a piece on NPR*,
Which is now completely controlled by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
As they Announce every 5 minutes how wonderful they are...

But i digress.

There's this Piece on Stanley Drucker, Who is soon retiring,
On June 27th, from The NY Philharmonic Orchestra.
Stanley has been with the Orchestra for 60 years as a Clarinetist.

Whenever i hear a story about someone that has been doing something
Since before i was born...
It sort of Freaks me out...
My Visceral Reaction is that i am still VERY Young;
And it might still be possible for me to drop everything that i'm doing,
And just start over.

- - -
* i also have another ( Much more Heretical & Conspiratorial ) Belief about NPR
And that is; That All Their Guests are The Same Guy.
i base this on The Apparent Fact that they All Sound The Same...
And by The Same; i don't mean accents or tonal frequency...
But their Patterns of Word use are The Same... Such that i Speculate that This One Guy is using an Electronic Device to Change The Sound of His Voice, So that he sounds like someone from England or India, Russia or Louisiana, New Mexico or Japan.
Despite the many differences in the voices,
Underneath that; They All Stutter, Laugh, Pause and use The Same Idioms as Everyone Else...
???

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

More Thoughts On The Gematria ( The Cabbage Codes )

Wm Jaz sent me some more of his fiddlings with The S:E:G
Plus another rant suggesting highly improbably Biblical Nonsense...
And it included his ideas on Gematria & Poetry in another biddle that i can't seem to locate...

Where did i see that...???


He called this new combination of Poetry & Number Fun : Gemoetry
In Which Lines of Verse would all add up to a given sum...

Likewise: There should be a Class of Haiku called: Gemaiku.
In which each line 5 / 7 / 5 of an Haiku would add up to a given sum.

And this got me to thinking more about The Magick & Silliness of The Gematria.
While i am Amazed at The Results that may be brought forth
From tinkering With The Gematria,
i also believe that i have a shallow enough ( merely sufficient ) understanding
Of how these results can be fabricated without evoking An Actual Cabbage Headed Gawd.

While It is fairly easy to contrive A Cabbage Code
To find Astonishing Messages in Any Book
That one might choose to examine;
A frail comprehension of how The Gematria works
Takes a slight edge off that stupefication.

So i am now proposing...
That in order to write better Geometry & Gemaiku,
Along with Great Long Tracts with Line after Line of Prose
In which Each line equals any sum that you might choose...
...That someone with access to an easy to use Programming Language write a :
Gematria Thesaurus.

It would work something like this:
You would write a long Tract or Sonnet in perfectly ordinary prose
And Ask The Gematria Thesaurus to Analyze it.
The Structure of The Prose may, or may not, be readily adapted to your objective,
So that further pre-processing may be necessary...
But let us just say, for now, that i simply want this very long letter to my mother,
To be arranged in such a way, like The Structure of The Bible—
Into Verses...
So that each Verse Equals 666.

The Gematria Thesaurus would simply determine the actual value of each Verse,
Then suggest that a particular Verse be broken into pieces
Or combined with neighboring Verses.
Then it would find words, terms, phrases, abbreviations &/or such
That might bend the value of any given verse closer to the desired sum ( of 666 ).
The User would then continue this process by fudging the sentences,
While the Gematria Thesaurus might Actively suggest Adverbs, Adjectives & Other Bits
That would bring The Sum Up,
If a Given Sentence were in need of some Padding,
Or suggest Deletions of such if it were too fat.

Such A Project would require; As Envisioned,
To be just nearly as tedious as An Examiner might suspect
The Creation of such a document would be,
But Not quite so much...

Such a Document would indeed seem to The Damp Masses as Severely Miraculous;
While to the mildly informed;
They Would know that it was cheap hokum.

At this point; It should be noted that there are perhaps 3 or 5... ( ??? ) Classes of Examiners...

The Completely UnInformed:
That Would Think that it would be impossible by any human effort.

The Slightly Informed:
That understands the basic premise of The Gematria,
And sees in such a document the Wonder of it...
But is perhaps a little suspicious...?

The Well Informed by means of Media Outlets:
That knows just enough, without having a deeper understanding of what they're looking at;
To think that it's a cheap trick.
This last class of humnaimals make up The Great Coterie of Gullible Skeptics,
Which easily believe whatever pleases them,
And disregard the fine points of understanding anything.

While the Last Group:
Which i include myself.
Are Those that know that our understanding of The Gematria is flawed & fragmented,
But are aware of the two sides of The Gematria simultaneously.
That it's Easily Explained—
As a function of a Rich & Diverse Base Language to Contrive Nonsense From...

And— That it's Still Totally Fawking Wondrous
& Provoking of Deeper ( Genuine ) Insights.

New Fun Toy...!!!

i discovered a New Fun Toy...!
It is Called; Scratch...!
It's a very simple to use programming language intended for very small children & mischievous adults...!
This is what a Script for it looks like:


It's kind of like Lego Programming...
And it's derived - Probably - from The Logo Programming Languages
That were created about 30 years ago,
And then mysteriously disappeared...!

Since it was created for young children;
It does things very differently from the way adult programming environments work...!
It takes about as much getting used to as Reverse Polish Language
for The HP Programmable Calculators...!

Here is one of My First Programs... Is This Number Prime?

This version that i'm using is Scratch 1.3.1 and from the forums,
It sounds like this is the 4th or so actual version of it.
What is very annoying is that the programmers are apparently Not Macintosh Users,
As there are Almost No User Friendly Conventions that Are Endemic in Apple Programs!
It is also Missing many Commands & Functions;
Such as Input Structures or String Processing Functions...!!!

This really has some potential for Becoming something really Fabulous though
By The Time Version 6.8 comes out...!

Friday, May 15, 2009

The Most Freakish Audio Effect Ever...!!!

You must be wearing stereo headphones while listening to this,
And it might also help if you closed your eyes,
And it might help further if you are alone in a closed room...!

It will Freak your Freak.

AudioZaniness