In The News :
In a Recent ( Late Summer 2012 ) News Story, a Senator or Senate Candidate ( ? ) asserted that ( Rephrased for Clarity ) : Women that are ‘Legitimately’ Raped rarely become pregnant because their bodies respond to The Stress of The Rape by causing a Miscarriage.
- - -
Is this True?
It seems to me, from what i’ve heard, Getting Pregnant is actually much harder than it is usually assumed. Very often women will become ‘Unexpectedly’ pregnant, but many women try & try & try to become pregnant without success.
There is only a small window of Opportunity after Estrus/Ovulation for The Egg to become Fertilized, So that to determine how true this is;
You’d have to assemble a large case file of Violent Rapes by Strangers, ( 2000 or so ) & then Determine which of these were in this Window of Opportunity after Ovulation, & of Those; How many would be Expected to have become Pregnant ?
It is also my understanding that Many women that do become pregnant in a ‘Friendly’ Manner, endure a Miscarriage so soon after Fertilization that they aren’t aware that they ever were pregnant, discovering that their ‘Period’ is a week or so late; Or perhaps several weeks or months later, when they experience what is known as a ‘Missing Fetus’.
So after you churn through all these numbers; Do women that endure a Violent Rape by A Stranger, become pregnant less often than a Control group of ‘Friendly Sex’, Casual Sex, ‘Date-Rape’ Sex, Low Coercion Sex, Incest Sex, Violent Sex by an Acquaintance, Drug Facilitated Rapes, Statutory Rapes, Age Inappropriate Sex, Caste Inappropriate Sex, Teaser Sex, UnReliable BirthControl Sex, Obligatory Date Sex, Returning a Favor or Loan Sex, Prostitute Sex, Peer Pressure Sex, ‘I didn’t know that I was having Sex, Sex’, Sperm in The Bathwater Sex, Sperm on The Outside of a Condom Sex, Sperm introduced to a Vagina during Cunnilingus Sex, Shared Vibrator Sex, Sperm on a Tampon Sex, Artificial Insemination Sex, Fertilization outside The Body, accompanied by Egg Implantation Sex, Or ‘UnDefined’ Sex ?
The Reason that i am making a distinction between Violent Rape Sex by A Stranger And Violent Rape by an Acquaintance is that it is entirely reasonable that The Violent Rape by An Acquaintance may result in Mixed Feelings, which would essentially skewer The Arguably Small Statistical Effect caused by The Stress of The Violent Rape. It might also be entirely relevant what The Environment of The Rape was, How Attractive The Rapist was, How Famous The Rapist is, &/or Whether The Rapist used a Knife, Gun, Rope, Fists or Convincing Threats. All these Factors ( And Others ) should be included in The Complete Study.
- - -
Another Aspect of this ‘MisStatement’ Fiasco was in The Many Media Analysis’ that followed;
The Expression; ‘Rape is Rape’ was used.
When is Rape, Rape ?
Obviously; Many ‘Statutory’ Rapes are not Rapes at all.
But there are many even more confusing ‘Soft’ Rapes.
What if a Sexually Precocious 12 year old girl with very large breasts, & an IQ of 160, told a Seriously Retarded 30 year old man that she was 18 & in love with him, prior to sexual intercourse.
Then After this Casual Sexual Encounter; The Man is Traumatized by her Indifference in The Following Weeks.
Who raped who?
i also find is very annoying that while The ‘Legitimacy’ of Sexual Contact is Based on a Sliding Scale of Appropriate Ages that Varies Widely from State to State, Country to Country, Culture to Culture, Historical Period to Historical Period; These are all Ostensibly Based on The Maturity of The Girl ( Rarely The Boy ) - - - But there is No Quantitative Spectrum of What Maturity Consists of. Certainly Not a Legal Standard, that would allow An Accused Rapist or Victim to be Measured for Their Maturity.
If you allow that Women can Rape Men ( or at The Very Least; Emotionally Traumatize a Man through Casual Sex ) Then it must often by The Case that An Emotionally Mature Women takes advantage of an Emotionally Immature Man, Not only for Sexual Gratification, but for Financial Gain, Or to Leverage Some other kind of Advantage over The Man.
What is The ‘Crime’ of Inappropriate Sex ?
An UnWanted or UnPrepared Pregnancy.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases.
Social or Employee Politics.
Emotionally Traumatic Aftermath.
What is my Solution ?
Eliminate The Crime of Rape.
Eliminate The Crime of Virginity Theft. The most curious thing about Virginity Theft; Is that it was/is rarely considered a crime against The girl, but as a crime against her father, betrothed husband or perhaps, husband or other male kin, whose investment in The Girl has been substantially diminished or ‘Ruined’.
Retain The Crime of Assault. Whether Physical or Emotional or Both.
Retain The Crime of Inducing a Non-Consensus Pregnancy. Which could be applied to Men & Women Equally ! A man might easily claim that he is The Victim of A Non-Consentual Pregnancy if The Woman Assured him that she was using BirthControl when she knowingly was Not !
Retain ( or Create ) The Crime of Disease Assault. It seems obvious to me that people that knowingly spread Herpes or Other Communicable Diseases ( Not necessarily restricted to Sexually Transmitted Diseases ! ) should be held accountable under The Concept of an Assault.
Create The Crime of Teaser Sex. This is when a Man or Woman teases a Partner into A Casual Sexual Relationship with The Tacit or Implied Promise or Assurance of A Long Term Romance. This would most commonly be used for The Prosecution of ‘Underage’ Sex, in which A Younger Partner may believe that The Older ‘Aggressor’ is ‘Seriously’ in Love with them. / But it would also Exclude An Older Partner that either was seriously in Love with a younger partner, -Or- Shared an Emotional Confusion of Their Romantic Potential. Such as when a 26 year old male believes that he is in love with a 14 year old girl, but has neglected to consider that she is at a transformative stage in her life & will be a significantly different person in another year or two. In this case; He would be just as victimized by his own Emotional commitment as she is.
The Punishment of These ‘Crimes’ would be much more ‘Relatively’ Appropriate & in Confluence with Similar Situations that are Free of The Sexual Component.
Just how Legally Culpable should someone be for Emotional Confusion ?
Friday, August 31, 2012
Poltical Advertising
Political Advertising
One
Ads that are disingenuous or insincere or state out & out lies,
are just wrong.
Two
Mean spirited ads against your opponent are just wrong.
You should always speak charitably about your opponent,
And all The more so; if they are mentally disabled or clinically insane.
Three
Political Advertising should be fun!
Your Own Ads for yourself, your positions or programs Should be light hearted and emphasize how you & your ideals are going to help america, The world, humanity, The environment, wild-life, And The Deep Future.
Your own Ads should always include :
smiling, laughing, giggling children,
puppies playing with kittens,
Wide Blue Skies with Billowing White Clouds,
A Entirely Unique Theme Song,
You in casual attire, without shoes, throwing a Frisbee,
Doing chores around The house,
helping at a soup kitchen,
picking up dog poop,
painting a watercolor landscape,
talking about simple, common problems that deserve simple solutions,
reminding everyone that america needs both
The Rich Capitalists
and The Common Rabble that form The Backbone and Foundation of our Economy
and That we all need to care for our Elderly,
disabled, Wild-life, The environment
& The Future.
Playing with Technologies that won’t be available for at least another 10 years.
Changing a Diaper or giving an Elderly woman a sponge bath.
Visiting a Court House and relaying a few anecdotes about how The justice system is severely broken.
Spinning a Large World Globe and giving A short history of The World.
Four
So long as you are scrupulously Honest and Accurate with your ‘Attack’ Ads,
And they are light-hearted; It is permissible to introduce a sprinkling of Kookiness.
Such as:
A Series of Ads FOR your Opponent that feature a wide range of citizens espousing The wonderful features & aspects of your Opponent.
If you believe that your opponent is advocating some policy that will hurt The american people, The world in general, The environment or sell our future to cannibals from Mars;
Then you DO NOT Attack those positions, you find sincere citizens that accurately describe these policies and why they are good for (x.
This series of Ads should feature a very wide spectrum of citizens, The Filthy Rich, Poor Dirt Farmers, Evangelical Christians & Moslems, School Children, Talking Chimps, Schizophrenic Homeless Nudists, Supermarket Sackers, Astronauts, Amish Dwarves, Street Thugs or Convicts on Death Row, Starving Poets, Police that are interrupted from beating up skateboarders, Domestic Terrorists working in their bomb factory, Scientists working on heretical or seemingly absurd projects; and so on.
The common theme of all these ‘interviews’ is that The speaker will always introduce some very subtle tangental idea of their own, that would strongly suggest that they are, quite insane.
One
Ads that are disingenuous or insincere or state out & out lies,
are just wrong.
Two
Mean spirited ads against your opponent are just wrong.
You should always speak charitably about your opponent,
And all The more so; if they are mentally disabled or clinically insane.
Three
Political Advertising should be fun!
Your Own Ads for yourself, your positions or programs Should be light hearted and emphasize how you & your ideals are going to help america, The world, humanity, The environment, wild-life, And The Deep Future.
Your own Ads should always include :
smiling, laughing, giggling children,
puppies playing with kittens,
Wide Blue Skies with Billowing White Clouds,
A Entirely Unique Theme Song,
You in casual attire, without shoes, throwing a Frisbee,
Doing chores around The house,
helping at a soup kitchen,
picking up dog poop,
painting a watercolor landscape,
talking about simple, common problems that deserve simple solutions,
reminding everyone that america needs both
The Rich Capitalists
and The Common Rabble that form The Backbone and Foundation of our Economy
and That we all need to care for our Elderly,
disabled, Wild-life, The environment
& The Future.
Playing with Technologies that won’t be available for at least another 10 years.
Changing a Diaper or giving an Elderly woman a sponge bath.
Visiting a Court House and relaying a few anecdotes about how The justice system is severely broken.
Spinning a Large World Globe and giving A short history of The World.
Four
So long as you are scrupulously Honest and Accurate with your ‘Attack’ Ads,
And they are light-hearted; It is permissible to introduce a sprinkling of Kookiness.
Such as:
A Series of Ads FOR your Opponent that feature a wide range of citizens espousing The wonderful features & aspects of your Opponent.
If you believe that your opponent is advocating some policy that will hurt The american people, The world in general, The environment or sell our future to cannibals from Mars;
Then you DO NOT Attack those positions, you find sincere citizens that accurately describe these policies and why they are good for (x.
This series of Ads should feature a very wide spectrum of citizens, The Filthy Rich, Poor Dirt Farmers, Evangelical Christians & Moslems, School Children, Talking Chimps, Schizophrenic Homeless Nudists, Supermarket Sackers, Astronauts, Amish Dwarves, Street Thugs or Convicts on Death Row, Starving Poets, Police that are interrupted from beating up skateboarders, Domestic Terrorists working in their bomb factory, Scientists working on heretical or seemingly absurd projects; and so on.
The common theme of all these ‘interviews’ is that The speaker will always introduce some very subtle tangental idea of their own, that would strongly suggest that they are, quite insane.
How Angels Work—
Saturday, August 11, 2012 1:15:51 PM
How Angels Work.
About a Week or two ago i noticed that my kitchen sink, cold water ( ? faucet was leaking a tiny bit. About a Measuring Cup full every 12 hours or so. So i decided that i would fix it myself, and tried to turn off The water under The sink, but The handle would not turn at all, in either direction. And this faucet handle was one of those kind that has The spokes and are commonly found on outside garden hose faucets. If you turn one of these too hard, or incorrectly; they will just break apart. This has happened often enough to me that i am certainly convinced that it is a very prevalent design flaw, and whenever you run across a design flaw like this that has existed for many, many, many years and is not being remedied by anyone; It is there for some purpose.
Is it simply there to sell more faucet handles, or something else?
i suspect something else, but even i can’t fathom what this something else is!
So anyways; i ran over to Ace’s Hardware Store where i was sure that they’d have some kind of ‘Outer Sheath’ that could be placed over one of these faucet handles and turn it without breaking it. It seems like a very obvious idea to me. Not only to keep The Faucet Handle from Breaking, but also, just to get a better grip on it. But they had no such device and apparently had never heard of such a thing ( ?
So i got a Rubber Gasket dealie meant to be used on Jelly Jars, and returned home with some other things, washers and something else i think ( ? ( i would have to look in The Bag to see what else i bought, but it is out of arms reach at this moment.
And then i procrastinated.
i didn’t really have any confidence that The Rubber Gasket Thingy would work, and i was trying to think of something else…
And then.
A Very Scruffy Man came to my door a few days ago and told me that they’d need to turn off The Water for a few hours and i said; ‘No problem, take as long as you’d like.’ and then i went back to my nap.
And a few hours later, he came back to tell me that The Water was back on,
And About A whole day later; It suddenly occurred to me that i should have taken that window of opportunity to change The washer in The Kitchen Faucet !
But i didn’t.
ugh.
How Angels Work.
About a Week or two ago i noticed that my kitchen sink, cold water ( ? faucet was leaking a tiny bit. About a Measuring Cup full every 12 hours or so. So i decided that i would fix it myself, and tried to turn off The water under The sink, but The handle would not turn at all, in either direction. And this faucet handle was one of those kind that has The spokes and are commonly found on outside garden hose faucets. If you turn one of these too hard, or incorrectly; they will just break apart. This has happened often enough to me that i am certainly convinced that it is a very prevalent design flaw, and whenever you run across a design flaw like this that has existed for many, many, many years and is not being remedied by anyone; It is there for some purpose.
Is it simply there to sell more faucet handles, or something else?
i suspect something else, but even i can’t fathom what this something else is!
So anyways; i ran over to Ace’s Hardware Store where i was sure that they’d have some kind of ‘Outer Sheath’ that could be placed over one of these faucet handles and turn it without breaking it. It seems like a very obvious idea to me. Not only to keep The Faucet Handle from Breaking, but also, just to get a better grip on it. But they had no such device and apparently had never heard of such a thing ( ?
So i got a Rubber Gasket dealie meant to be used on Jelly Jars, and returned home with some other things, washers and something else i think ( ? ( i would have to look in The Bag to see what else i bought, but it is out of arms reach at this moment.
And then i procrastinated.
i didn’t really have any confidence that The Rubber Gasket Thingy would work, and i was trying to think of something else…
And then.
A Very Scruffy Man came to my door a few days ago and told me that they’d need to turn off The Water for a few hours and i said; ‘No problem, take as long as you’d like.’ and then i went back to my nap.
And a few hours later, he came back to tell me that The Water was back on,
And About A whole day later; It suddenly occurred to me that i should have taken that window of opportunity to change The washer in The Kitchen Faucet !
But i didn’t.
ugh.
Is The Interweb UnReliable?
While most internet users believe that Wikipedia is Unreliable, i have always considered it to be an entirely reasonable and concise source of information most of The Time. My greatest consternation is The many of The entries that i recalled and were interested in, were incomplete and often neglected to include or use illustrations to make a particular topic clearer.
But two things happened recently which have caused me to lose All Faith in The Internet !
One was when i accidentally came across an apparently ‘real’ news item that revealed The Death of a Major Media Whore. i didn’t even particularly like this particular Media Whore, but i was somewhat interested in this item and attempted to follow this up with other sources, of which, there were none. My first impression was that this was such a recent & breaking story, that The principle news & media outlets hadn’t had time to ‘format’ a proper story onto The internet !
So i thought, i will just wait until The evening news comes on The TV and there will be a full story on this. But there was none. The next day i again tried to find some news on this death, but i could not find any ! ?
Finally; After about 3 days ! i realized that Not Only was this A HOAX ! But If i were to type into Google The Name of Any Celebrity and The Word ‘Dead’ or ‘Death’; Google would return a ‘News Story’ that revealed The Death of This Celebrity !
It was only when i tried to click on some of The Accompanying Tabs on this News Site that i discovered that None of them Worked, and The Death of The Selected Celebrity was reported to have happened very recently, such as, Earlier Today.
The Second Thing that has Shaken my Faith in The Internet was what seemed like Numerous Stories that were ‘Reliably’ reporting that Amazon would soon Release The Kindle Fire II.
It seemed to me that i was finding this news on many different websites, but when i finally realized that The Predicted Release Date had come and gone, i also realized that this news was coming from one or perhaps two web-sources. i should have been tipped off that None of The Other ‘Major’ Technical News & Media Outlets were mentioning this; But i hadn’t yet come to believe that The Internet would so egregiously try to deceive me !
The Third Thing that has recently soured me to The point of emotional collapse,
Is that Netflix, Hulu+, Amazon & iTunes do Not, for any fee or Subscription Price, feature Recently Released Commercial Films !
iTunes comes closest, but you can only buy The films for exorbitant prices !
The ones that you can rent ( Watch Once ) are from several years ago,
And Netflix is Far Worse. The most recent films that they have on Direct Viewing, are 5 or more years old.
Hulu+ is apparently only for TV Programs,
And Amazon is very confusing. The Films come up, but there is no button to access/watch them ? !
i would like to go back to Netflix Mail Service, but i recently had several DVDs stolen from my mailbox and no longer trust The Post Office.
Back in 1999 when The End of The World was though to be eminent;
i thought that i was perceiving that The world was bunching up in The corners like carpeting being pushed in from The doorway, which proved to be illusionary, or subjectively inaccurate,
But now i think it is really happening this time.
But two things happened recently which have caused me to lose All Faith in The Internet !
One was when i accidentally came across an apparently ‘real’ news item that revealed The Death of a Major Media Whore. i didn’t even particularly like this particular Media Whore, but i was somewhat interested in this item and attempted to follow this up with other sources, of which, there were none. My first impression was that this was such a recent & breaking story, that The principle news & media outlets hadn’t had time to ‘format’ a proper story onto The internet !
So i thought, i will just wait until The evening news comes on The TV and there will be a full story on this. But there was none. The next day i again tried to find some news on this death, but i could not find any ! ?
Finally; After about 3 days ! i realized that Not Only was this A HOAX ! But If i were to type into Google The Name of Any Celebrity and The Word ‘Dead’ or ‘Death’; Google would return a ‘News Story’ that revealed The Death of This Celebrity !
It was only when i tried to click on some of The Accompanying Tabs on this News Site that i discovered that None of them Worked, and The Death of The Selected Celebrity was reported to have happened very recently, such as, Earlier Today.
The Second Thing that has Shaken my Faith in The Internet was what seemed like Numerous Stories that were ‘Reliably’ reporting that Amazon would soon Release The Kindle Fire II.
It seemed to me that i was finding this news on many different websites, but when i finally realized that The Predicted Release Date had come and gone, i also realized that this news was coming from one or perhaps two web-sources. i should have been tipped off that None of The Other ‘Major’ Technical News & Media Outlets were mentioning this; But i hadn’t yet come to believe that The Internet would so egregiously try to deceive me !
The Third Thing that has recently soured me to The point of emotional collapse,
Is that Netflix, Hulu+, Amazon & iTunes do Not, for any fee or Subscription Price, feature Recently Released Commercial Films !
iTunes comes closest, but you can only buy The films for exorbitant prices !
The ones that you can rent ( Watch Once ) are from several years ago,
And Netflix is Far Worse. The most recent films that they have on Direct Viewing, are 5 or more years old.
Hulu+ is apparently only for TV Programs,
And Amazon is very confusing. The Films come up, but there is no button to access/watch them ? !
i would like to go back to Netflix Mail Service, but i recently had several DVDs stolen from my mailbox and no longer trust The Post Office.
Back in 1999 when The End of The World was though to be eminent;
i thought that i was perceiving that The world was bunching up in The corners like carpeting being pushed in from The doorway, which proved to be illusionary, or subjectively inaccurate,
But now i think it is really happening this time.
UnSpecified Rant ( Logic Sanity Taboos ) ?
As A Crazy Person ( Myself )
i am particularly Interested in : What is Crazy ?
i have already decided that ‘Logic’ & ‘Reasoning’ are Bunk.
That is; Formal Logical Reasoning is Seriously Dysfunctional.
The Purpose of Using Formal Propositional Logic
Is to be Absolutely Sure or Certain of Some Carefully Constructed Argument.
In Actual Practice, We know that No Such Argument Exists,
Various People may be Absolutely Sure of Some Principle, Hypothesis or Ideology, But The Fact that many ‘Reasonable’ People Vehemently Disagree with them, This Strongly Suggests that this Idea of An Irrefutable Argument is Itself ‘Mistaken’.
There is No Such a Thing.
My own Formal ‘Irrefutable’ Argument that Logic Itself is Bunk;
Proved with Formal Propositional Logic is this :
Let us first allow that there is A Formal Propositional System of Logical Reasoning, Which, When used Properly; Can Produce Irrefutable Arguments.
There are Several very Serious Problems with ‘Properly Using’ This System of Logical Reasoning; The Most Conspicuous is that The Creator of The Argument must first ‘Subjectively’ Assign a Truth Value to Each Propositional Variable.
In Classical Propositional Logic; These Truth Values are Either True or False;
Which is Problematic in The Real World. There are many Variables that you’d like to use in An Argument, Whose Truth Value is Initially in Dispute, or Deeply UnCertain. Even Any Given Culture’s Most Axiomatic Assumptions about The World, Human Nature or Philosophical Assumptions are Amazingly InCalculable, or Irresolute.
Using Fractional Propositional Logic; Which has its Own System of Logical Functions with which to ‘Operate’ on Fractional Values of Truth. This System allows Truth Values to Hold a Value of 0 ≤ p ≤ 1 And The Functions; AND, OR, IFT, XOR and such, Produce Results that Always stay within this Range.
The Result is that your Propositions may be ‘Sort of True’ or ‘Mostly False’ or ‘Who Knows’ and Retain your Logical Structure.
The Final Result holds to This Premise; and May Provide A Solution that is Unsatisfactorily Vague. It will fall short of The Desired Irrefutable Argument, but in Real World Situations; It may provide a Conclusion or Judgment that is Entirely Consistent with All Facts and Stand Up to A Critical Attack of He Said, She Said.
Two :
Along with this ‘Real’ Logical Reasoning System, There Exists a More Familiar System of Jiggery Pokery Logic, which is Routinely used by Ordinary People to ‘Prove’ their Personal Opinions & Religious Views. This system is rife with ‘Logical Fallacies’ in which One or More Steps of The Argument Assert Something that even The Most Superficial Reflection Upon It will Cast a Serious Shadow on its Validity.
Nevertheless; Such ‘Lay’ Arguments are extremely Pervasive, Used Extensively in Advertising, Cultural or Social Indoctrination, Cult Tutelage &/or Any Family Decision that is in Dispute.
A Carefully Established & Well Constructed Jiggery Pokery Argument may appear just as Strong & UnAssailable as A ‘Real’ Logical Argument; But more Importantly; Anything; Anything at All may be ‘Proved’ with A Jiggery Pokery Argument; While Real Logic can only Prove True Things.
If A Particular Section, Premise or Step of The Jiggery Pokery Argument is Attacked Successfully; The Jiggery Pokery Argument may Simply ‘Resolve’ this Weakness with An Additional Jiggery Pokery Argument, Recursively & without Limit.
Although These Jiggery Pokery Arguments are ‘Just Wrong’;
It must be Conceded that They are Often Held to Be ‘Accurate’ or ‘Valid’ by Many People, and while you, or A ‘Professional’ Logician may believe that you would not be swayed or Convinced by such Bogus & Frivolous Rationalizations or Justifications, It is entirely reasonable that you have already fallen pry to these Beliefs and are UnAware that you have Stumbled in this Manner.
The Point is That : If The Purpose of True Logic is provide Certainty in your Decision Making, and Jiggery Pokery Logic Countermands that Functionality, And are Often ( Even Occasionally ) Indistinguishable from Truly Logical Explanations & Assertions;
Then The Functionality of True Logic is Compromised.
Thus: Logic is Bunk.
Ethics is The Examination & Determination of What is Right or Wrong;
And The Tool that is Used to Make these Distinctions in Reason & Logic.
So; By Extension, Ethics are Compromised.
Sanity is The Assumption that there exists a Standard of Behaviour which is Universally ‘Good’ for Both The Individual & The Community, Society or Culture.
Which requires a Logical Approach to Tease Apart The Many Slivers of ‘What is Good’. It is often easy to determine that something is ‘Good’ for ‘Me’ right now, But will it be Good for Me tomorrow? Is it Good for my Neighbors? Is it Good for Strangers Two Blocks Over? Is it Good for ‘Outworlders’?
And since Logic is Broken; All attempts to Use Reason to determine what is ‘Good’ is Deeply Flawed.
The Definition of Sanity is Deeply Flawed.
It is Most Evident when Examining what is Commonly, Or Universally thought of as ‘Good’ or ‘Sane’ or ‘Crazy’.
It should also be Introduced that there exists a Particular Kind of ‘Universal Beliefs’ that are held to be ‘Really, Really True’; And are Not.
These Beliefs have a Very Quirky Functionality, and since they are taught to The children of a Given Society or Culture from their Earliest Moments of Inclusion in their Communities, They are Not subject to The Necessity of Being ‘Reasonable’ or ‘Explained’. They are simply True.
Unambiguously; Inarguably True.
These Beliefs are Called Taboos.
Most Taboos are well entrenched into The Legal & Judicial System of A Society and Carry Very Severe Penalties for Violating them.
It seems very odd to me though; that If these Taboos are So Obviously ‘Wrong’, Then only a Crazy Person would Violate them. Which is -Exactly- How their Violations are Considered. Breaking a Taboo is Not simply Infringing on some Rule; No. Disregarding a Taboo is Proof Positive that The Offender is Clinically Insane. Never mind that each Society has their own Taboos, Most of which are completely different from Culture to Culture. A Taboo in Canada may be perfectly acceptable behaviour in Mexico.
And everyone ( ? ) seems to be aware of this; And doesn’t change anything.
If you Defy a Taboo in your own Community, While it is Well understood that such a Crime is only Wrong ‘Here’, It is Still Very, Very Wrong.
Some people ‘Rationalize’ this as evidence that Everyone Else, In all The Other Countries, are Completely Insane.
Really.
Many People really believe that The People in Other Countries aren’t even ‘Real’ People.
Taboos Do Have real Functionality though. They allow everyone in A Community to Immediately Know if Someone is Crazy, and Potentially Dangerous. If you see someone violating a Taboo; Then they are Obviously Crazy or An Outworlder, and they may pose a Threat to your Safety. Avoid them. Tell your Parents or The Authorities that there is A Crazy Person over there.
You don’t have to be a Clinical Psychiatrist or Lawyer to make an Evaluation like this; You simply have to know What is Allowable and What is Not.
One very kooky aspect of Taboos is that Nearly Every Taboo has a Sister Behaviour that is perfectly OK, Even in The Society that Enforces The Primary Taboo. There are also Certain ‘Contexts’ in which a Taboo can just be Turned Off like Light Switch.
In Contemporary America for Example;
It is Forbidden for A Woman to Display or Allow to be Seen, Her Areola or Nipples.
It is Perfectly OK for A Man to Display Their Nipples.
It is Perfectly OK for Magazines to be Sold that feature Predominant Photographs of Women’s Nipples.
It is Perfectly OK for Animals to Display their Feminine Nipples,
And while it is Considered Very, Very Wrong for An Adult Man or Woman to Suckle On A Human Woman’s Breast, or Drink Bottled Human Milk, It is Perfectly OK to Drink The Milk of A Cow or Goat, But Not A Dog or Cat.
A Grown Man may even openly suckle The Teat of a Cow or Goat on National Television for Comedic Effect, and Such a Man may be thought of as ‘Eccentric’ or ‘Goofy’, But This Behaviour would not be Criminal or Socially Ostracizing.
Murdering People is Considered Very, Very Wrong; But there are Many, Many Exceptions to This Prohibition, and Those that eagerly Adhere to The Proposition that Murder or Killing People is Very, Very Wrong; Often Equally Believe that The Exceptions are Permissible or Appropriate, And they find No Contradiction in These Beliefs.
This should now Establish my Foundation of My Initial Question:
What is Crazy ?
If A Society is going to Allow The Idea of ‘Sanity’ or ‘Insanity’ to hold important positions within The Legal, Educational or Social Services & Systems,
Then They Should have Real ‘Functionality’.
The Idea of What is Crazy should Not be Completely Arbitrary.
Which it is.
In Recent ( Summer 2012 ) News;
How can our Society believe that James E. Holmes could methodically plan & then perpetrate an attack on a theatre full of people, killing a dozen, and wounding far more, and Not be Insane. How can our society believe that he was exercising The Same ‘Logic’ & ‘Reasoning’ that anyone else may choose to make a Baloney Sandwich or Watch an Old Episode of Gilligan’s Island ?
There are people that are ‘Mad-Dog’ Crazy, frothing at The Mouth, Ranting Incoherently, Running around in Circles, Painting with Feces, Using Dead Bodies as Sculptures, Compulsively Masturbating, Enjoying The Company of Children or Violating Victimless Taboos.
But each of these is commonly performed by Artists, Poets & Grade School Teachers.
There doesn’t seem to be a Clear Definition of What is Crazy.
i have this ‘Other’ idea that while The Legal System defines Insanity as A Persons Inability to know The Difference between ‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’.
It is my contention that Everyone, or Anyone that Breaks a Law or Taboo can not make this Distinction; Based on The Very Simple Assertion that If you Believe that Something is Wrong, They you won’t do it.
You may ‘Understand’ that other people may believe that wearing mismatched socks is Deeply Wrong, You will wear mismatched socks without any apprehension whatsoever. You clearly do not understand that wearing mismatched socks is ‘Really’ Wrong.
Even The Most Egregiously Evil Necrophiliac Cannibal will certainly have their personal code of conduct, which may include a prohibition against eating pancakes without syrup. Eating Pancakes without Syrup is not simply disagreeable, but deeply, culturally wrong. One may wonder how their personal code came into being which allows for certain behaviours that are widely assumed to be vulgar & abominable and other mildly exasperating situations to be thoroughly forbidden.
Is it really any different for everyone? This Case only presents us with An Extremium Case, but not an Anomalous Case.
What i believe.
i don’t believe that anyone can truly think.
Humanimals are pre-Conscious Entities.
Societies are built upon rules no different than those used by ants &/or bees.
The Rules of Thumb that Humanimal Societies use may be more complex, boarding on Chaotic ( Approaching Randomality ), but Qualitatively; They are Equal.
i also don’t believe in Freewill.
i allow that each ‘Conscious’ Entity is Autonomous in The Sense that our Minds are A Composite ‘Result’ of All The Gravitational & ElectroMagnetic Forces effecting each of our Personal Node Vertices; But These Focus Points have no Control or Influence over their Own Behaviour or Thoughts.
We are Only ‘Aware’ of what is Happening to us.
Each Conscious Entity is an Observer of themselves,
Incapable of Exercising The Tiniest Amount of Directed Intentions.
i am particularly Interested in : What is Crazy ?
i have already decided that ‘Logic’ & ‘Reasoning’ are Bunk.
That is; Formal Logical Reasoning is Seriously Dysfunctional.
The Purpose of Using Formal Propositional Logic
Is to be Absolutely Sure or Certain of Some Carefully Constructed Argument.
In Actual Practice, We know that No Such Argument Exists,
Various People may be Absolutely Sure of Some Principle, Hypothesis or Ideology, But The Fact that many ‘Reasonable’ People Vehemently Disagree with them, This Strongly Suggests that this Idea of An Irrefutable Argument is Itself ‘Mistaken’.
There is No Such a Thing.
My own Formal ‘Irrefutable’ Argument that Logic Itself is Bunk;
Proved with Formal Propositional Logic is this :
Let us first allow that there is A Formal Propositional System of Logical Reasoning, Which, When used Properly; Can Produce Irrefutable Arguments.
There are Several very Serious Problems with ‘Properly Using’ This System of Logical Reasoning; The Most Conspicuous is that The Creator of The Argument must first ‘Subjectively’ Assign a Truth Value to Each Propositional Variable.
In Classical Propositional Logic; These Truth Values are Either True or False;
Which is Problematic in The Real World. There are many Variables that you’d like to use in An Argument, Whose Truth Value is Initially in Dispute, or Deeply UnCertain. Even Any Given Culture’s Most Axiomatic Assumptions about The World, Human Nature or Philosophical Assumptions are Amazingly InCalculable, or Irresolute.
Using Fractional Propositional Logic; Which has its Own System of Logical Functions with which to ‘Operate’ on Fractional Values of Truth. This System allows Truth Values to Hold a Value of 0 ≤ p ≤ 1 And The Functions; AND, OR, IFT, XOR and such, Produce Results that Always stay within this Range.
The Result is that your Propositions may be ‘Sort of True’ or ‘Mostly False’ or ‘Who Knows’ and Retain your Logical Structure.
The Final Result holds to This Premise; and May Provide A Solution that is Unsatisfactorily Vague. It will fall short of The Desired Irrefutable Argument, but in Real World Situations; It may provide a Conclusion or Judgment that is Entirely Consistent with All Facts and Stand Up to A Critical Attack of He Said, She Said.
Two :
Along with this ‘Real’ Logical Reasoning System, There Exists a More Familiar System of Jiggery Pokery Logic, which is Routinely used by Ordinary People to ‘Prove’ their Personal Opinions & Religious Views. This system is rife with ‘Logical Fallacies’ in which One or More Steps of The Argument Assert Something that even The Most Superficial Reflection Upon It will Cast a Serious Shadow on its Validity.
Nevertheless; Such ‘Lay’ Arguments are extremely Pervasive, Used Extensively in Advertising, Cultural or Social Indoctrination, Cult Tutelage &/or Any Family Decision that is in Dispute.
A Carefully Established & Well Constructed Jiggery Pokery Argument may appear just as Strong & UnAssailable as A ‘Real’ Logical Argument; But more Importantly; Anything; Anything at All may be ‘Proved’ with A Jiggery Pokery Argument; While Real Logic can only Prove True Things.
If A Particular Section, Premise or Step of The Jiggery Pokery Argument is Attacked Successfully; The Jiggery Pokery Argument may Simply ‘Resolve’ this Weakness with An Additional Jiggery Pokery Argument, Recursively & without Limit.
Although These Jiggery Pokery Arguments are ‘Just Wrong’;
It must be Conceded that They are Often Held to Be ‘Accurate’ or ‘Valid’ by Many People, and while you, or A ‘Professional’ Logician may believe that you would not be swayed or Convinced by such Bogus & Frivolous Rationalizations or Justifications, It is entirely reasonable that you have already fallen pry to these Beliefs and are UnAware that you have Stumbled in this Manner.
The Point is That : If The Purpose of True Logic is provide Certainty in your Decision Making, and Jiggery Pokery Logic Countermands that Functionality, And are Often ( Even Occasionally ) Indistinguishable from Truly Logical Explanations & Assertions;
Then The Functionality of True Logic is Compromised.
Thus: Logic is Bunk.
Ethics is The Examination & Determination of What is Right or Wrong;
And The Tool that is Used to Make these Distinctions in Reason & Logic.
So; By Extension, Ethics are Compromised.
Sanity is The Assumption that there exists a Standard of Behaviour which is Universally ‘Good’ for Both The Individual & The Community, Society or Culture.
Which requires a Logical Approach to Tease Apart The Many Slivers of ‘What is Good’. It is often easy to determine that something is ‘Good’ for ‘Me’ right now, But will it be Good for Me tomorrow? Is it Good for my Neighbors? Is it Good for Strangers Two Blocks Over? Is it Good for ‘Outworlders’?
And since Logic is Broken; All attempts to Use Reason to determine what is ‘Good’ is Deeply Flawed.
The Definition of Sanity is Deeply Flawed.
It is Most Evident when Examining what is Commonly, Or Universally thought of as ‘Good’ or ‘Sane’ or ‘Crazy’.
It should also be Introduced that there exists a Particular Kind of ‘Universal Beliefs’ that are held to be ‘Really, Really True’; And are Not.
These Beliefs have a Very Quirky Functionality, and since they are taught to The children of a Given Society or Culture from their Earliest Moments of Inclusion in their Communities, They are Not subject to The Necessity of Being ‘Reasonable’ or ‘Explained’. They are simply True.
Unambiguously; Inarguably True.
These Beliefs are Called Taboos.
Most Taboos are well entrenched into The Legal & Judicial System of A Society and Carry Very Severe Penalties for Violating them.
It seems very odd to me though; that If these Taboos are So Obviously ‘Wrong’, Then only a Crazy Person would Violate them. Which is -Exactly- How their Violations are Considered. Breaking a Taboo is Not simply Infringing on some Rule; No. Disregarding a Taboo is Proof Positive that The Offender is Clinically Insane. Never mind that each Society has their own Taboos, Most of which are completely different from Culture to Culture. A Taboo in Canada may be perfectly acceptable behaviour in Mexico.
And everyone ( ? ) seems to be aware of this; And doesn’t change anything.
If you Defy a Taboo in your own Community, While it is Well understood that such a Crime is only Wrong ‘Here’, It is Still Very, Very Wrong.
Some people ‘Rationalize’ this as evidence that Everyone Else, In all The Other Countries, are Completely Insane.
Really.
Many People really believe that The People in Other Countries aren’t even ‘Real’ People.
Taboos Do Have real Functionality though. They allow everyone in A Community to Immediately Know if Someone is Crazy, and Potentially Dangerous. If you see someone violating a Taboo; Then they are Obviously Crazy or An Outworlder, and they may pose a Threat to your Safety. Avoid them. Tell your Parents or The Authorities that there is A Crazy Person over there.
You don’t have to be a Clinical Psychiatrist or Lawyer to make an Evaluation like this; You simply have to know What is Allowable and What is Not.
One very kooky aspect of Taboos is that Nearly Every Taboo has a Sister Behaviour that is perfectly OK, Even in The Society that Enforces The Primary Taboo. There are also Certain ‘Contexts’ in which a Taboo can just be Turned Off like Light Switch.
In Contemporary America for Example;
It is Forbidden for A Woman to Display or Allow to be Seen, Her Areola or Nipples.
It is Perfectly OK for A Man to Display Their Nipples.
It is Perfectly OK for Magazines to be Sold that feature Predominant Photographs of Women’s Nipples.
It is Perfectly OK for Animals to Display their Feminine Nipples,
And while it is Considered Very, Very Wrong for An Adult Man or Woman to Suckle On A Human Woman’s Breast, or Drink Bottled Human Milk, It is Perfectly OK to Drink The Milk of A Cow or Goat, But Not A Dog or Cat.
A Grown Man may even openly suckle The Teat of a Cow or Goat on National Television for Comedic Effect, and Such a Man may be thought of as ‘Eccentric’ or ‘Goofy’, But This Behaviour would not be Criminal or Socially Ostracizing.
Murdering People is Considered Very, Very Wrong; But there are Many, Many Exceptions to This Prohibition, and Those that eagerly Adhere to The Proposition that Murder or Killing People is Very, Very Wrong; Often Equally Believe that The Exceptions are Permissible or Appropriate, And they find No Contradiction in These Beliefs.
This should now Establish my Foundation of My Initial Question:
What is Crazy ?
If A Society is going to Allow The Idea of ‘Sanity’ or ‘Insanity’ to hold important positions within The Legal, Educational or Social Services & Systems,
Then They Should have Real ‘Functionality’.
The Idea of What is Crazy should Not be Completely Arbitrary.
Which it is.
In Recent ( Summer 2012 ) News;
How can our Society believe that James E. Holmes could methodically plan & then perpetrate an attack on a theatre full of people, killing a dozen, and wounding far more, and Not be Insane. How can our society believe that he was exercising The Same ‘Logic’ & ‘Reasoning’ that anyone else may choose to make a Baloney Sandwich or Watch an Old Episode of Gilligan’s Island ?
There are people that are ‘Mad-Dog’ Crazy, frothing at The Mouth, Ranting Incoherently, Running around in Circles, Painting with Feces, Using Dead Bodies as Sculptures, Compulsively Masturbating, Enjoying The Company of Children or Violating Victimless Taboos.
But each of these is commonly performed by Artists, Poets & Grade School Teachers.
There doesn’t seem to be a Clear Definition of What is Crazy.
i have this ‘Other’ idea that while The Legal System defines Insanity as A Persons Inability to know The Difference between ‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’.
It is my contention that Everyone, or Anyone that Breaks a Law or Taboo can not make this Distinction; Based on The Very Simple Assertion that If you Believe that Something is Wrong, They you won’t do it.
You may ‘Understand’ that other people may believe that wearing mismatched socks is Deeply Wrong, You will wear mismatched socks without any apprehension whatsoever. You clearly do not understand that wearing mismatched socks is ‘Really’ Wrong.
Even The Most Egregiously Evil Necrophiliac Cannibal will certainly have their personal code of conduct, which may include a prohibition against eating pancakes without syrup. Eating Pancakes without Syrup is not simply disagreeable, but deeply, culturally wrong. One may wonder how their personal code came into being which allows for certain behaviours that are widely assumed to be vulgar & abominable and other mildly exasperating situations to be thoroughly forbidden.
Is it really any different for everyone? This Case only presents us with An Extremium Case, but not an Anomalous Case.
What i believe.
i don’t believe that anyone can truly think.
Humanimals are pre-Conscious Entities.
Societies are built upon rules no different than those used by ants &/or bees.
The Rules of Thumb that Humanimal Societies use may be more complex, boarding on Chaotic ( Approaching Randomality ), but Qualitatively; They are Equal.
i also don’t believe in Freewill.
i allow that each ‘Conscious’ Entity is Autonomous in The Sense that our Minds are A Composite ‘Result’ of All The Gravitational & ElectroMagnetic Forces effecting each of our Personal Node Vertices; But These Focus Points have no Control or Influence over their Own Behaviour or Thoughts.
We are Only ‘Aware’ of what is Happening to us.
Each Conscious Entity is an Observer of themselves,
Incapable of Exercising The Tiniest Amount of Directed Intentions.
Wednesday, August 08, 2012
Second ( ? ) Paparazzi Rant
If you're a Celebrity hounded by Paparazzi
And you'd like to get rid of them;
Simply Identify ( Have one of your assistants do this ! )
All Potential Source Editors & Publications that would
Potentially buy these mundane & tedious snapshots of you
Walking down The Street or Getting into or out of a Car,
And Suggest to them;
That if they quit buying these pictures
from The Usual Suppository of Paparazzi;
You will provide them with a Professionally photographed,
Yet surprisingly impromptu &/or unexpected
'Dream' Photographs that they'd been wishing for, for years & years,
Every few months at a very modest fee.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Another idea is that The Celebrity ÔFakesÕ The brutal murder of A Paparazzi, and then ÔCovers it UpÕ somehow so that charges are never filed.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
A small Alternative to that is The Celebrity Brutally Beats The Krap Out of A Paparazzi, and all of it is captured by The other Paparazzi, and again everyone either disappears, is paid off or intimidated into not pressing charges.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
And you'd like to get rid of them;
Simply Identify ( Have one of your assistants do this ! )
All Potential Source Editors & Publications that would
Potentially buy these mundane & tedious snapshots of you
Walking down The Street or Getting into or out of a Car,
And Suggest to them;
That if they quit buying these pictures
from The Usual Suppository of Paparazzi;
You will provide them with a Professionally photographed,
Yet surprisingly impromptu &/or unexpected
'Dream' Photographs that they'd been wishing for, for years & years,
Every few months at a very modest fee.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Another idea is that The Celebrity ÔFakesÕ The brutal murder of A Paparazzi, and then ÔCovers it UpÕ somehow so that charges are never filed.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
A small Alternative to that is The Celebrity Brutally Beats The Krap Out of A Paparazzi, and all of it is captured by The other Paparazzi, and again everyone either disappears, is paid off or intimidated into not pressing charges.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
911 Thought Experiment & Film Suggestions
911 Thought Experiment
i would like you to build a scale model of one of The 'Twin' Towers of New York 911 Fame.
This model should be Height to Width Scale, Made of any Materials that you'd like, using any design that you'd like, reproducing most or all of The floors & central support column - - Or not. It may be just a outer wall of 'Stiffened' toilet paper or toothpicks, paper straws, hay, sugar cubes or whatever.
The only caveat for this 'Anything Goes' Model Construction; Is that it has to be Able to Stand up under its own weight, firmly attached to a flat ground level platform, and withstand very gentle side to side movement, as The Actual Twin Towers were designed to withstand hurricane or Near hurricane strength winds.
Now.
Find an Electric Carving Knife or Saw with such & such specifications that will allow you to Remove The Top Third of The Building with a clean horizontal straight cut of without substantially Damaging The Rest of The Building in any way; Such as any damage that might be expected from wrenching it off with sustained twisting, bending & pulling.
The Actual Twin Towers were essentially severed with 'Surgical' precision, and that's what this experiment would like you to reproduce. The amount of damage to any other floors, beyound The half dozen or fewer that were effected by The plane crashes in The Orthodox Explanation, was very minimal.
Now.
Take this Top Third and Hold it very directly ( this might be tricky to manage ) over The Lower Two Thirds, by what would be The Scale equivalent of a Dozen Floors, and Drop it.
What happens?
Does The Entire Building Collapse, Fall over, Pancake down, Disintegrate, or do anything other than just sit there.
This Experiment Predicts that Irregardless of how Fragile you made your Model Building according to The Single Caveat, The Top Third with plop down on The Remaining Two Thirds and just sit there, or if it were dropped from a sufficient height, that would defy The Actual Twin Towers Scenario, There would be a slight 'Bounce' and The Top Third would Fall away or Topple over, Leaving The Remaining Two Thirds, unscathed.
This Experiment further predicts that given that The Top Third of The Building, was made from The Same Materials and Construction Methods as The Lower Two Thirds of The Model, Could; Under NO Circumstances of Throwing This Top Third at The Lower Two Thirds, Dropping it from Any Height, Whacking at it like a Bat for Several Minutes, or Alighting it with a Match and leaving it on The Two Thirds Top for An Hour or two, will harm or Cause The Lower Two Thirds to Fall over or Collapse in Any Manner.
How might one reconcile this with The Actual Twin Towers Collapse ?
It might be suggested that A True Scale Model introduces a 'Special Kind' of Fragility, but This Experiment Specifically Invites The Model Builder to Make a Model as Fragile as they possibly can.
What i can't 'Envision' is any building that is capable of holding it's own weight, or The weight of it's top third, and then suddenly loosing that capability in a catastrophic & disastrous manner that occurs as one might flick a light switch; curious & bewildering.
What is the Correct Explanation for this Experiment ?
This Experiment was taken from ( in a modified form ) from The Film :
9/11: Blueprint for Truth / The Architecture of Destruction
Some other Fine Heretical Films :
Aftermath: Unanswered Q's from 9/11
911Taboo
Part One : http://www.livevideo.com/video/genghis6199/1666F9D3661E461EA858D7300117BAEF/911taboo-part-1.aspx
Part Two : http://www.livevideo.com/video/genghis6199/20B1D80FABD140D28DA9B5FFB0A2CB3E/911taboo-part-2.aspx
Loose Change http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501
Loose Change Final Cut
Fahrenheit 9/11
The Road to Guantánamo © 2006
No End in Sight ( Exposé of The Ongoing Iraq War ( Circa 2001+
The Shock Doctrine ( Based on The Book by Naomi Klein )
What Happened on the Moon? ( Best Exposé of The Fake Moon Landings
-Bore Hole- by Joey Mellen & Amanda Fielding ( Self Trepanning
Sick: The Life & Death of Bob Flanagan, SuperMasochist ( 1997
Unforgiven ( 1992
Michael Jackson / The Lost Documentary ( YouTube ) Strong Evidence that All of The Accusations of Child Molestation against him were Bogus
District 9 ( Best Alien Film Ever
Fido ( Best Zombie Film Ever
The President's Analyst / 1967 ( Best Political, Military Industrial Complex Film Ever
Kick Ass ( Best Super Hero Film
The Emerald Forest ( Best Amazonian Aborigine Film
Frank Capra's WWII : Why we Fight ( 7 1_h± Films Terrific Historical Analysis of WWII
The Notorious Bettie Page ( Best Historical Autobiography of a Porn Star
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed ( Best Intelligent Designer / Intellectual Freedom Film
V for Vendetta
Tae Guk Gi : The Brotherhood of War ( Best Korean War Film
Miami Blues ( Best Petty Criminal / Chase Film
Flags of Our Fathers ( 2006 / Letters from Iwo Jima ( 2007
Equilibrium
GoodFellas: Special Edition
Little Dieter Needs to Fly ( Best Documentary of Vietnam War
The Good Fairy / 1935 / "I'm going to buy a pencil sharpener with a handle!" Dr. Max Sporum
Pierrepoint ( Best Documentary of The Life of An Executioner
Panique au Village / A Town Called Panic ( Best Stop Action Film
There Will Be Blood ( Best Documentary of The Early History of Oil Drilling
The Hudsucker Proxy
Whale Rider ( Best Native American Aborigine Film
Rabbit Proof Fence ( Best Documentary of Mid 20th Century Australia
An Unreasonable Man : Ralph Nader
Hoodwinked ( Best Fairytale Film
In the Realms of the Unreal ( Best Documentary of a Naive Artist Film
Ink
Love Me If You Dare ( Best Love Story
My Super Ex-Girlfriend ( Very Good Superhero Film
North Face ( Best Mountain Climbing Film
Payback ( This is a perfectly mundane little film with Mel Gibson, before he went crazy; Who plays a petty gangster that was sent up the river for his part in a heist of somekind, and is now out, and goes to the underworld boss to collect his share of the robbery. Curiously; The underworld boss & others don't understand that all he wants is a reasonably small, fixed amount, that he's calculated is due to him. And so he, The Mel Gibson character, reeks terrible havoc on these people, because they just won't listen. This is a theme that i am haunted with constantly; The Problem of wanting to get some simple thing done, and no one will listen to me. It's very frustrating.
Romy & Michele's High School Reunion ( Best Gay/Lesbian Film
The Razor's Edge 1)Powell / 2)Murray
Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance
The Passion of Joan of Arc ( 1928
Save the Green Planet! ( Excellent Mystery/Crazy Person Film
The Professional
The Third Man (1949) ( Best Soundtrack
The Bridge on the River Kwai
The Trouble with Angels ( Best Ending for a Disney Film
A Man Called Horse / The Return of a Man Called Horse
The Green Hornet ( 2010
Exit Through the Gift Shop
The Desert of Forbidden Art / 2010 / Suppressed Russian Art
The Lady Eve
The Jacket ( Best Psychological Time Travel Film
Ants: Little Creatures Who Run The World
Boys Don't Cry
DOA ( Original & Remake ( Later : Crank & Crank 2
Gummo
Hail the Conquering Hero / 1945
The Miracle of Morgan Creek
The Great McGinty
Kingpin
Lake Placid
The Fly ( Original Version
The Fly (1986)
The Kite Runner
i would like you to build a scale model of one of The 'Twin' Towers of New York 911 Fame.
This model should be Height to Width Scale, Made of any Materials that you'd like, using any design that you'd like, reproducing most or all of The floors & central support column - - Or not. It may be just a outer wall of 'Stiffened' toilet paper or toothpicks, paper straws, hay, sugar cubes or whatever.
The only caveat for this 'Anything Goes' Model Construction; Is that it has to be Able to Stand up under its own weight, firmly attached to a flat ground level platform, and withstand very gentle side to side movement, as The Actual Twin Towers were designed to withstand hurricane or Near hurricane strength winds.
Now.
Find an Electric Carving Knife or Saw with such & such specifications that will allow you to Remove The Top Third of The Building with a clean horizontal straight cut of without substantially Damaging The Rest of The Building in any way; Such as any damage that might be expected from wrenching it off with sustained twisting, bending & pulling.
The Actual Twin Towers were essentially severed with 'Surgical' precision, and that's what this experiment would like you to reproduce. The amount of damage to any other floors, beyound The half dozen or fewer that were effected by The plane crashes in The Orthodox Explanation, was very minimal.
Now.
Take this Top Third and Hold it very directly ( this might be tricky to manage ) over The Lower Two Thirds, by what would be The Scale equivalent of a Dozen Floors, and Drop it.
What happens?
Does The Entire Building Collapse, Fall over, Pancake down, Disintegrate, or do anything other than just sit there.
This Experiment Predicts that Irregardless of how Fragile you made your Model Building according to The Single Caveat, The Top Third with plop down on The Remaining Two Thirds and just sit there, or if it were dropped from a sufficient height, that would defy The Actual Twin Towers Scenario, There would be a slight 'Bounce' and The Top Third would Fall away or Topple over, Leaving The Remaining Two Thirds, unscathed.
This Experiment further predicts that given that The Top Third of The Building, was made from The Same Materials and Construction Methods as The Lower Two Thirds of The Model, Could; Under NO Circumstances of Throwing This Top Third at The Lower Two Thirds, Dropping it from Any Height, Whacking at it like a Bat for Several Minutes, or Alighting it with a Match and leaving it on The Two Thirds Top for An Hour or two, will harm or Cause The Lower Two Thirds to Fall over or Collapse in Any Manner.
How might one reconcile this with The Actual Twin Towers Collapse ?
It might be suggested that A True Scale Model introduces a 'Special Kind' of Fragility, but This Experiment Specifically Invites The Model Builder to Make a Model as Fragile as they possibly can.
What i can't 'Envision' is any building that is capable of holding it's own weight, or The weight of it's top third, and then suddenly loosing that capability in a catastrophic & disastrous manner that occurs as one might flick a light switch; curious & bewildering.
What is the Correct Explanation for this Experiment ?
This Experiment was taken from ( in a modified form ) from The Film :
9/11: Blueprint for Truth / The Architecture of Destruction
Some other Fine Heretical Films :
Aftermath: Unanswered Q's from 9/11
911Taboo
Part One : http://www.livevideo.com/video/genghis6199/1666F9D3661E461EA858D7300117BAEF/911taboo-part-1.aspx
Part Two : http://www.livevideo.com/video/genghis6199/20B1D80FABD140D28DA9B5FFB0A2CB3E/911taboo-part-2.aspx
Loose Change http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501
Loose Change Final Cut
Fahrenheit 9/11
The Road to Guantánamo © 2006
No End in Sight ( Exposé of The Ongoing Iraq War ( Circa 2001+
The Shock Doctrine ( Based on The Book by Naomi Klein )
What Happened on the Moon? ( Best Exposé of The Fake Moon Landings
-Bore Hole- by Joey Mellen & Amanda Fielding ( Self Trepanning
Sick: The Life & Death of Bob Flanagan, SuperMasochist ( 1997
Unforgiven ( 1992
Michael Jackson / The Lost Documentary ( YouTube ) Strong Evidence that All of The Accusations of Child Molestation against him were Bogus
District 9 ( Best Alien Film Ever
Fido ( Best Zombie Film Ever
The President's Analyst / 1967 ( Best Political, Military Industrial Complex Film Ever
Kick Ass ( Best Super Hero Film
The Emerald Forest ( Best Amazonian Aborigine Film
Frank Capra's WWII : Why we Fight ( 7 1_h± Films Terrific Historical Analysis of WWII
The Notorious Bettie Page ( Best Historical Autobiography of a Porn Star
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed ( Best Intelligent Designer / Intellectual Freedom Film
V for Vendetta
Tae Guk Gi : The Brotherhood of War ( Best Korean War Film
Miami Blues ( Best Petty Criminal / Chase Film
Flags of Our Fathers ( 2006 / Letters from Iwo Jima ( 2007
Equilibrium
GoodFellas: Special Edition
Little Dieter Needs to Fly ( Best Documentary of Vietnam War
The Good Fairy / 1935 / "I'm going to buy a pencil sharpener with a handle!" Dr. Max Sporum
Pierrepoint ( Best Documentary of The Life of An Executioner
Panique au Village / A Town Called Panic ( Best Stop Action Film
There Will Be Blood ( Best Documentary of The Early History of Oil Drilling
The Hudsucker Proxy
Whale Rider ( Best Native American Aborigine Film
Rabbit Proof Fence ( Best Documentary of Mid 20th Century Australia
An Unreasonable Man : Ralph Nader
Hoodwinked ( Best Fairytale Film
In the Realms of the Unreal ( Best Documentary of a Naive Artist Film
Ink
Love Me If You Dare ( Best Love Story
My Super Ex-Girlfriend ( Very Good Superhero Film
North Face ( Best Mountain Climbing Film
Payback ( This is a perfectly mundane little film with Mel Gibson, before he went crazy; Who plays a petty gangster that was sent up the river for his part in a heist of somekind, and is now out, and goes to the underworld boss to collect his share of the robbery. Curiously; The underworld boss & others don't understand that all he wants is a reasonably small, fixed amount, that he's calculated is due to him. And so he, The Mel Gibson character, reeks terrible havoc on these people, because they just won't listen. This is a theme that i am haunted with constantly; The Problem of wanting to get some simple thing done, and no one will listen to me. It's very frustrating.
Romy & Michele's High School Reunion ( Best Gay/Lesbian Film
The Razor's Edge 1)Powell / 2)Murray
Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance
The Passion of Joan of Arc ( 1928
Save the Green Planet! ( Excellent Mystery/Crazy Person Film
The Professional
The Third Man (1949) ( Best Soundtrack
The Bridge on the River Kwai
The Trouble with Angels ( Best Ending for a Disney Film
A Man Called Horse / The Return of a Man Called Horse
The Green Hornet ( 2010
Exit Through the Gift Shop
The Desert of Forbidden Art / 2010 / Suppressed Russian Art
The Lady Eve
The Jacket ( Best Psychological Time Travel Film
Ants: Little Creatures Who Run The World
Boys Don't Cry
DOA ( Original & Remake ( Later : Crank & Crank 2
Gummo
Hail the Conquering Hero / 1945
The Miracle of Morgan Creek
The Great McGinty
Kingpin
Lake Placid
The Fly ( Original Version
The Fly (1986)
The Kite Runner
In Defense of Rioting & Looting
In Defense of Rioting & Looting
i was just listening to an account of some Rioting & Looting in Britain,
But this sort of thing happens all over The World;
And The Principle Feature of This Demonstration of Anarchy that most people find incomprehensible and indefensible: Is The Looting of Shoppes, Over Turning Cars, Setting Fires and so on.
The Participants are usually just 'Caught Up' in The Hysteria of The Moment, and this sort of thing is a common 'Evolutionary' Feature of Human Behaviour that encourages 'By Standers' to become involved in Any Social or Economic Activity that Either Bolsters The Social Fabric or Protects The Group from Foreign Aggression by acting as A Larger Group, or Promises Greater Success in A Hunt by Using as Many Members of The Community in A Mammoth Hunt, as possible.
Ordinarily; If, In any of these cases; The Individual were allowed to carefully and thoughtfully consider whether they should or should not rush at The Mammoth with a Rock in each Fist, They would, If The Person is reasonably sane & not mentally retarded, They should decide to refrain from participation and simply urge on those that are rushing towards The Mammoth.
But for The Community to Survive, Evolution has endowed each member with a Fail-Safe Switch which turns off Common Sense when A Given Behaviour is Actually Better for The Group, and The Communities Gene Pool, which each Member has A Vested Interest in Preserving and Propagating.
So; How does this Genetic Programming Work with Applications to Modern Society?
Firstly; Mostly; It encourages everyone to 'Join In' with Everyone else in 'Being Normal' and 'Doing What Everyone Else is Doing'.
This is very advantageous to most Economic Issues, and also discourages Technological & Aesthetic Changes, which works against progress & Change, As Evolution hates Change.
Although Evolution is all About Change;
Change, According to The Rules of Evolution, Occurs only very slowly.
Species are much more Encouraged to Remain The Same, and only very begrudging change, and so slowly that No Change is Noticed.
This explains why Human Civilization, until very recently; Advanced Technologically, Very Slowly.
We should have discovered Electricity or Steam Powered Engines Tens of Thousands of Years ago, and Leonardo should have created a viable hang glider thousands of years ago, or The Egyptians thousands of years before that.
The Romans with their thorough understanding of mechanical devices, Should have invented a Bicycle or some other kind of powered cart. Never mind that Slaves & Horses were cheap, Both has severe liabilities and The Romans should have recognized this.
No.
The reason that Civilizations have advanced so slowly is because Evolution understands that Change is nearly always Bad.
If you're alive and reasonably prosperous today, there is no Need for Change. Change is only Acceptable when things get very bad. And usually;
When things do get this bad, Change can't take place because The Resources and Expertise is No Longer Available.
The Reason that Change is so common Now-a-Days, is because most people 'Understand' at a Subliminal, Intrinsic or Congenital Level, that Western Civilization is Grievously Broken, and it just so happens that there are enough 'Successful' people to change Things while most of The Broken People support and encourage everyone to become & remain aware that Society is in fact broken.
So.
The Riots & Looting that occasionally erupt are A SubClass of This Phenomena.
What usually ignites a given Riot is that The Police Murder some 'Perceived' Innocent Person, and The Judicial System is Laggardly in dispensing A Reasonable & Acceptable Solution or Vengeance.
The Riot & Looting is An Expression of A Mob Activity ( Evolutionarily Good ) that 'Tells' or 'Informs' The Business Classes ( The Middle Class or Bourgeoisie ) That The Community is Broken.
The Bourgeoisie are slow to realize that Their Village or City is Broken, because while The Police are Murdering 'The Little People', They are still Safe; So The Little People have to make it clear to The Social Officiates that If The Little People are going to be made to suffer, they will suffer too.
Regretfully; This Migration of Social Wisdom is Too Convoluted to be Readily Absorbed in A Functional Manner.
Instead; The Principle Tax Payers & Regional Managers don't make The Connection between A & B. They only See The Consequences of B and further oppress The Little People Until they're made Submissive & Acquiescent Again.
Things may improve a little for awhile,
But The pattern is far more cyclical than linear.
i was just listening to an account of some Rioting & Looting in Britain,
But this sort of thing happens all over The World;
And The Principle Feature of This Demonstration of Anarchy that most people find incomprehensible and indefensible: Is The Looting of Shoppes, Over Turning Cars, Setting Fires and so on.
The Participants are usually just 'Caught Up' in The Hysteria of The Moment, and this sort of thing is a common 'Evolutionary' Feature of Human Behaviour that encourages 'By Standers' to become involved in Any Social or Economic Activity that Either Bolsters The Social Fabric or Protects The Group from Foreign Aggression by acting as A Larger Group, or Promises Greater Success in A Hunt by Using as Many Members of The Community in A Mammoth Hunt, as possible.
Ordinarily; If, In any of these cases; The Individual were allowed to carefully and thoughtfully consider whether they should or should not rush at The Mammoth with a Rock in each Fist, They would, If The Person is reasonably sane & not mentally retarded, They should decide to refrain from participation and simply urge on those that are rushing towards The Mammoth.
But for The Community to Survive, Evolution has endowed each member with a Fail-Safe Switch which turns off Common Sense when A Given Behaviour is Actually Better for The Group, and The Communities Gene Pool, which each Member has A Vested Interest in Preserving and Propagating.
So; How does this Genetic Programming Work with Applications to Modern Society?
Firstly; Mostly; It encourages everyone to 'Join In' with Everyone else in 'Being Normal' and 'Doing What Everyone Else is Doing'.
This is very advantageous to most Economic Issues, and also discourages Technological & Aesthetic Changes, which works against progress & Change, As Evolution hates Change.
Although Evolution is all About Change;
Change, According to The Rules of Evolution, Occurs only very slowly.
Species are much more Encouraged to Remain The Same, and only very begrudging change, and so slowly that No Change is Noticed.
This explains why Human Civilization, until very recently; Advanced Technologically, Very Slowly.
We should have discovered Electricity or Steam Powered Engines Tens of Thousands of Years ago, and Leonardo should have created a viable hang glider thousands of years ago, or The Egyptians thousands of years before that.
The Romans with their thorough understanding of mechanical devices, Should have invented a Bicycle or some other kind of powered cart. Never mind that Slaves & Horses were cheap, Both has severe liabilities and The Romans should have recognized this.
No.
The reason that Civilizations have advanced so slowly is because Evolution understands that Change is nearly always Bad.
If you're alive and reasonably prosperous today, there is no Need for Change. Change is only Acceptable when things get very bad. And usually;
When things do get this bad, Change can't take place because The Resources and Expertise is No Longer Available.
The Reason that Change is so common Now-a-Days, is because most people 'Understand' at a Subliminal, Intrinsic or Congenital Level, that Western Civilization is Grievously Broken, and it just so happens that there are enough 'Successful' people to change Things while most of The Broken People support and encourage everyone to become & remain aware that Society is in fact broken.
So.
The Riots & Looting that occasionally erupt are A SubClass of This Phenomena.
What usually ignites a given Riot is that The Police Murder some 'Perceived' Innocent Person, and The Judicial System is Laggardly in dispensing A Reasonable & Acceptable Solution or Vengeance.
The Riot & Looting is An Expression of A Mob Activity ( Evolutionarily Good ) that 'Tells' or 'Informs' The Business Classes ( The Middle Class or Bourgeoisie ) That The Community is Broken.
The Bourgeoisie are slow to realize that Their Village or City is Broken, because while The Police are Murdering 'The Little People', They are still Safe; So The Little People have to make it clear to The Social Officiates that If The Little People are going to be made to suffer, they will suffer too.
Regretfully; This Migration of Social Wisdom is Too Convoluted to be Readily Absorbed in A Functional Manner.
Instead; The Principle Tax Payers & Regional Managers don't make The Connection between A & B. They only See The Consequences of B and further oppress The Little People Until they're made Submissive & Acquiescent Again.
Things may improve a little for awhile,
But The pattern is far more cyclical than linear.
Something oddly dumb
Rover is a Dog. Rover has a Bone.
Its Bone.
Rover's Bone.
Rover was recently Cloned.
There are now Six Rovers.
How many Rovers? It's Six.
Did you notice that The Use of The Apostrophe
Is Exactly The Opposite for The Word -It-
As it is for A Proper Noun ( Rover ).
That is Stupid !
Its Bone.
Rover's Bone.
Rover was recently Cloned.
There are now Six Rovers.
How many Rovers? It's Six.
Did you notice that The Use of The Apostrophe
Is Exactly The Opposite for The Word -It-
As it is for A Proper Noun ( Rover ).
That is Stupid !
The Proper Usage of Numbers in Literature ( ? )
Number Usages
i came across a list of 'Rules' that pertained to The Use of Numerals, Numbers, Numerators, Numericals, Integers, Digits, Symbols, Pictoglyphs, Cardinal & Ordinal Numbers, Quantities, Quotas, Tallies, Aggregates, Totals, Characters & Words as Ephemeral or Eternal Conceptual Portions.
Naturally; i disagreed with many of their precepts.
Fortunately; This listing was accompanied by a lengthy supplementation of comments, which i will draw from, As well as add my own thoughts to, to amend and correct The Original Listing.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
A Number is A Conceptual Quantity,
Most readily used to indicate A Simple Tally of Whole Units.
There are Four Apples in The Basket.
A Numeral is A Pictoglyph or Word that Indicates a Numerical Value.
The Population of The World is 6,938,928 Traffic Cones.
The Idea of 3 is a Number; The Character '3' is a Numeral.
Ordinal Numbers refer to An Item's Relative Position;
The First Son was standing behind The Last Wife of The Eighth King.
Cardinal Numbers are specific Values;
There is One Black Cat & Five Blue Ones in The Basket.
The Borg Mix these;
To The Great Chagrin of The Federation.
Seven of Nine
Fifth of Twelve
Three of Eighths
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Smaller Numbers should be spelled out.
Zero, One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven & Twelve are Iconic Numbers and should be treated as Royalty.
Thirteen breaks This Stream of Immediately Recognized Quantities and may be Written as 13 when convenient to do so.
A Second & Third School of Thought suggests that This Initial Series should Only go to Nine, While The Actual 'Cognizant' Value that most people can 'Recognize' without counting, is Seven.
That is; If you see Five or Six birds, randomly distributed on a lawn, you will immediately 'know' that there are a specific number of birds in your field of vision. If there are Nine or Seventeen Birds; Your brain will merely tell your consciousness that there are 'Birds' on The Lawn.
Naturally; If The Birds are Arranged in 'Patterns' Then you will be able to Identify Much Larger Quantities.
If you're going to use this Rule; Perhaps you should take steps to find out what your personal 'Limit' for Subliminal Counting is; And use that Value for your Break Number that you Spell Out as A Word, and Thereafter; Use A Numerical Pictoglyph.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
As A Side Note:
3, 7 & 9 are Unique Pictoglyphs for Numbers,
But are 11, 39, 290 & 2,938,928 Pictoglyphs or Collections of Pictoglyphs?
Since Each represents A Unique Value;
Each is a Unique Pictoglyph. ( ? )
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
This Next Point is Very Exasperating;
And i first became aware of it when i Started using HP Calculators
That allowed The User to Set a Preference
For Which Decimal Indicator they would like to use.
Along with this;
Is The Character used to Break Large Numbers Up,
So as to make them Easier to Read.
e.g.; 383,990,029,920.25
The Period & Comma in this Usage are in Common in North America, and Possibly Britain,
But Nearly all other Nations use The Opposite Method;
e.g.; 783.920.020.982,333
Thank The gawds that we all agree that The Numerical Sets should Consist of 3 Digits.
Another Usage is 484 920 202 939. 202 991
Which is completely crazy.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
i once had a teacher that insisted that when 'saying' a large number, such as Two Hundred Twenty and Three;
This would mean 220.3.
The purpose of Language is to Convey Clear & Unambiguous Ideas,
And this Usage is clearly begging for trouble.
The More Correct Expression would be Two Hundred & Twenty, Point Three.
The Most Correct Expression would Two Two Zero Point Three, when used to convey an amount over The Phone.
In Writing; It would be; 220.3.
Any time a Decimal Enters into a Value;
Use All Digits.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
The Possible Exception to that would be Readily Recognized Simple Fractions.
One & A Half may be written out;
While 1½ is Probably Better.
1 1/2 is asking for trouble.
Seven & Twelve Sixteenths should be Expressed as a Decimal Value :
7.75 or Possibly : 7¾
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
How should you Write 22?
Twenty Two or Twentytwo ?
It may be that my spell checker is simply too lazy
To include all The Numbers to A Million or More;
But The Dictionary Fails to Recognize Twentytwo as well.
Twenty Two just seems Deeply Wrong and An Invitation for Ambiguity.
Which is Why; Large Numbers should be Written out as Pictoglyphs : 22.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Even Larger Numbers such as Four Billion, Three Hundred & Two Thousand & Sixtyfour might very easily convey A Value that diverges from The Desired Quantity.
Write it Out : 4,000,302,064
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
This comes back to commas as separators.
i've gotten very use to this; and periods are just wrong.
But i would also allow that commas are flawed.
There is a slim chance of confusion, especially when The text is Block Justified, which may skewer The Spacing to make it seem like 3, 302, 064 ( ? )
What is a Better Method?
3·302·064.92 ( ? )
i like The Little Pea, but it's tedious to use.
3)302)064.92
8/234/991·432/329/7
83702883819173.6721
72289817827191.892371
If Computers could automatically insert These Dividers,
That would be a step in The Right Direction.
Another approach may be If we were to start printing all our text in a highly formatted structure, kind of like Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphics, in which The Names of Royalty were placed inside Cartouches, or Oval Boxes.
Under this System; Numbers would be very specifically formatted, so that whatever their usage or value, They couldn't be mistaken for anything else.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Another Digression:
Numerical Sequences which Use Letters and Other Symbols,
Typically in Warehouse Inventory Identification Labels,
Should NOT use Ambiguous Characters !
Such as :
0/O
1 vs l
2 vs R
3 vs E
4 vs 9
5 vs S
6 vs b
7 vs T
8 vs B
9 vs q
Which Means All of them !
Such Identification Labels should NEVER be Contextualess.
They should always be Nonsensical Combinations of Familiar Animals, Plants, Written Numbers, Utensils, and such.
8729-RI90-O21
Should be :
Blind Zebra Nine Green Toaster Tall Spoon Slash Six One
Or Maybe in Consideration of Brevity;
Such Words may Never be Longer than Four Letters.
Blue Goat Red Newt Fast Leaf Two Six
Numbers May be Reduced for This Purpose :
One Two Thre Four Five Six Sevn Ate Ninr Ten
The Use of Word Sets could Indicate Special Classes of Items.
Animals mean The Item is for Electrical Tools,
Or whatever.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
When Saying Numbers or Letters in Any Context that May allow for The Tiniest Potential for Ambiguity, Such as Telephone Numbers or Inventory Labels;
Always use The Ham Radio Pronunciations with Distinct Pauses between Each AlphaNumerical Character :
Zee Row
Won
Too
Three
For rah
Fie Vah
Sicks or Sticks
Sev En
Ate
Niner
Ten
When Using A Word as A Single Character;
You may forget The 'Correct' Ham Radio Designators;
So for Consistency; Try to Remember These Rules of Thumb :
The Word should be A Distinct & Familiar Noun,
Like A Common Animal or Object, Or Very Unique Idea.
It should consist of Two or Three Syllables,
But Not Two or More Distinct Words that Make One Word.
e.g.; Bad Examples :
Eyeball may be thought to be Eye Ball or E-B
Iguana for I is bad because it sounds like E-Guana !
Alpha
Beta or Baby
Candy
Delta
Elephant
Fandango
Grape
Hippopotamus
Irish
Juvenile
Kangaroo
Lemonade
Macaroni / Machine
Neurotic
Octopus
Paper
Quasar
Raccoon
Sacred
Teacher
Unicorn
Vampire
Weasel
X-Ray
Yodel
Zebra
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Sentences in Stories or Formal Expositions should Never begin with a Number.
If you'd really like to use a Large Number which demands that it be written out in Digits; Reformulate your Sentence.
68,928 Birds were killed by Darkened Lighthouses last year.
Should become;
Darkened Lighthouses killed 68,928 Birds last year.
Five Cats are being kept in my closet.
Is OK.
I'm keeping Five Cats in my Closet.
Is Better.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Centuries, Decades & Iconographic or Ideological Class Sets should be Written out as Numerals.
The Twentieth Century
The Gadfly Seventies.
The Seventh Division
The First in his Class
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
1st, 8th, 2nd should only be used for dates.
July 1st, 1844
2nd of September
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Use of The Word Percentage.
Whenever an Actual Value is Included; 37%
The Symbol should be used;
But if you're speaking generally;
There is a Larger Percentage of Albinos living in The Refrigerator Crates than Chileans.
Is Preferred.
36 Percent vs 36%
Four Percent vs 4%
Using The Symbol seems A Lot Clearer to me.
Percent refers to A Conceptual Notion
Per Cent is An Abbreviation of The Description of The Calculation.
It is Belabored & Wrong.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Recipes should always use Numerals.
3 Cups.
287 Slightly Heaping
Teaspoons.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Unit Quantities should be Written :
3_Tsp
44_mph
.0183_Å
If A Unit Quantity is Used in A Context which Beggars Ambiguity or Confusion,
Such as When Writing for Attentive Third Graders;
3.26_ly should be 3.26 LightYears
27_kpd should be 27 Kilometers per Day*
- -
* Digression :
Something very fun that my HP 48 will do,
Is Convert 'Regular' Quantities into 'Crazy' Quantities.
60_mph = 1,267,197.46 Fathoms per Day
If i 'Define' a Shoelace as being 27 inches long.
'27_in' 'Shoe' STO
i can then use this new Unit Length
Exactly The Same Way i can use All The Other 'Orthodox' Units !
Speed of Light = 1_c
1_Shoe/yr ( Shoelaces per Year )
CONVERT
Warp One = 1.379 E 16_spy
- -
End Digression
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Avoid Arranging Two Numbers Next to One Another.
Three Four year olds fell in The Well.
It's not quite as confusing as A Double Negative,
But it's Ambiguous Enough to Avoid.
Try;
Three Children, Each of which; was Four years old, fell into The Well.
That sounds awfully labored ( ? )
It would be worse if you'd written;
3 4 year olds fell into The Well.
How about;
Three Preschoolers fell into The Well. The Oldest was Four, The Youngest, Also Four, and The Middle child was Four as well.
Using The Word 'Well' Twice in one Sentence,
with very different meanings is also confusing.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
The Use of Millions, Billions, Trillions ( et. al. )
As mentioned earlier;
Writing out large numbers as Numerals;
Four Billion, Sixtythree Million, Eight Hundred & Twentyone, And Sixteen
Is very confusing;
But—
If you're bandying about vague generalities as part of slur or disingenuous political argument;
Six Quadrillion Democratic Paraplegics are in favor of this Proposition.
Is much better than 6,000,000,000,000,000 Democratic Paraplegics…
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Consistency is The Jingoistic Fanaticism of The Small Minded Albinos or One Legged Sailors, But— You shouldn't Mix Metaphors or Cardinal & Ordinal Numbers just to annoy librarians either.
Use The 'Does is Make a Good Haiku' Rule of Thumb
To judge whether a Sentence is Reasonable or not.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
i came across a list of 'Rules' that pertained to The Use of Numerals, Numbers, Numerators, Numericals, Integers, Digits, Symbols, Pictoglyphs, Cardinal & Ordinal Numbers, Quantities, Quotas, Tallies, Aggregates, Totals, Characters & Words as Ephemeral or Eternal Conceptual Portions.
Naturally; i disagreed with many of their precepts.
Fortunately; This listing was accompanied by a lengthy supplementation of comments, which i will draw from, As well as add my own thoughts to, to amend and correct The Original Listing.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
A Number is A Conceptual Quantity,
Most readily used to indicate A Simple Tally of Whole Units.
There are Four Apples in The Basket.
A Numeral is A Pictoglyph or Word that Indicates a Numerical Value.
The Population of The World is 6,938,928 Traffic Cones.
The Idea of 3 is a Number; The Character '3' is a Numeral.
Ordinal Numbers refer to An Item's Relative Position;
The First Son was standing behind The Last Wife of The Eighth King.
Cardinal Numbers are specific Values;
There is One Black Cat & Five Blue Ones in The Basket.
The Borg Mix these;
To The Great Chagrin of The Federation.
Seven of Nine
Fifth of Twelve
Three of Eighths
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Smaller Numbers should be spelled out.
Zero, One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven & Twelve are Iconic Numbers and should be treated as Royalty.
Thirteen breaks This Stream of Immediately Recognized Quantities and may be Written as 13 when convenient to do so.
A Second & Third School of Thought suggests that This Initial Series should Only go to Nine, While The Actual 'Cognizant' Value that most people can 'Recognize' without counting, is Seven.
That is; If you see Five or Six birds, randomly distributed on a lawn, you will immediately 'know' that there are a specific number of birds in your field of vision. If there are Nine or Seventeen Birds; Your brain will merely tell your consciousness that there are 'Birds' on The Lawn.
Naturally; If The Birds are Arranged in 'Patterns' Then you will be able to Identify Much Larger Quantities.
If you're going to use this Rule; Perhaps you should take steps to find out what your personal 'Limit' for Subliminal Counting is; And use that Value for your Break Number that you Spell Out as A Word, and Thereafter; Use A Numerical Pictoglyph.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
As A Side Note:
3, 7 & 9 are Unique Pictoglyphs for Numbers,
But are 11, 39, 290 & 2,938,928 Pictoglyphs or Collections of Pictoglyphs?
Since Each represents A Unique Value;
Each is a Unique Pictoglyph. ( ? )
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
This Next Point is Very Exasperating;
And i first became aware of it when i Started using HP Calculators
That allowed The User to Set a Preference
For Which Decimal Indicator they would like to use.
Along with this;
Is The Character used to Break Large Numbers Up,
So as to make them Easier to Read.
e.g.; 383,990,029,920.25
The Period & Comma in this Usage are in Common in North America, and Possibly Britain,
But Nearly all other Nations use The Opposite Method;
e.g.; 783.920.020.982,333
Thank The gawds that we all agree that The Numerical Sets should Consist of 3 Digits.
Another Usage is 484 920 202 939. 202 991
Which is completely crazy.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
i once had a teacher that insisted that when 'saying' a large number, such as Two Hundred Twenty and Three;
This would mean 220.3.
The purpose of Language is to Convey Clear & Unambiguous Ideas,
And this Usage is clearly begging for trouble.
The More Correct Expression would be Two Hundred & Twenty, Point Three.
The Most Correct Expression would Two Two Zero Point Three, when used to convey an amount over The Phone.
In Writing; It would be; 220.3.
Any time a Decimal Enters into a Value;
Use All Digits.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
The Possible Exception to that would be Readily Recognized Simple Fractions.
One & A Half may be written out;
While 1½ is Probably Better.
1 1/2 is asking for trouble.
Seven & Twelve Sixteenths should be Expressed as a Decimal Value :
7.75 or Possibly : 7¾
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
How should you Write 22?
Twenty Two or Twentytwo ?
It may be that my spell checker is simply too lazy
To include all The Numbers to A Million or More;
But The Dictionary Fails to Recognize Twentytwo as well.
Twenty Two just seems Deeply Wrong and An Invitation for Ambiguity.
Which is Why; Large Numbers should be Written out as Pictoglyphs : 22.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Even Larger Numbers such as Four Billion, Three Hundred & Two Thousand & Sixtyfour might very easily convey A Value that diverges from The Desired Quantity.
Write it Out : 4,000,302,064
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
This comes back to commas as separators.
i've gotten very use to this; and periods are just wrong.
But i would also allow that commas are flawed.
There is a slim chance of confusion, especially when The text is Block Justified, which may skewer The Spacing to make it seem like 3, 302, 064 ( ? )
What is a Better Method?
3·302·064.92 ( ? )
i like The Little Pea, but it's tedious to use.
3)302)064.92
8/234/991·432/329/7
83702883819173.6721
72289817827191.892371
If Computers could automatically insert These Dividers,
That would be a step in The Right Direction.
Another approach may be If we were to start printing all our text in a highly formatted structure, kind of like Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphics, in which The Names of Royalty were placed inside Cartouches, or Oval Boxes.
Under this System; Numbers would be very specifically formatted, so that whatever their usage or value, They couldn't be mistaken for anything else.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Another Digression:
Numerical Sequences which Use Letters and Other Symbols,
Typically in Warehouse Inventory Identification Labels,
Should NOT use Ambiguous Characters !
Such as :
0/O
1 vs l
2 vs R
3 vs E
4 vs 9
5 vs S
6 vs b
7 vs T
8 vs B
9 vs q
Which Means All of them !
Such Identification Labels should NEVER be Contextualess.
They should always be Nonsensical Combinations of Familiar Animals, Plants, Written Numbers, Utensils, and such.
8729-RI90-O21
Should be :
Blind Zebra Nine Green Toaster Tall Spoon Slash Six One
Or Maybe in Consideration of Brevity;
Such Words may Never be Longer than Four Letters.
Blue Goat Red Newt Fast Leaf Two Six
Numbers May be Reduced for This Purpose :
One Two Thre Four Five Six Sevn Ate Ninr Ten
The Use of Word Sets could Indicate Special Classes of Items.
Animals mean The Item is for Electrical Tools,
Or whatever.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
When Saying Numbers or Letters in Any Context that May allow for The Tiniest Potential for Ambiguity, Such as Telephone Numbers or Inventory Labels;
Always use The Ham Radio Pronunciations with Distinct Pauses between Each AlphaNumerical Character :
Zee Row
Won
Too
Three
For rah
Fie Vah
Sicks or Sticks
Sev En
Ate
Niner
Ten
When Using A Word as A Single Character;
You may forget The 'Correct' Ham Radio Designators;
So for Consistency; Try to Remember These Rules of Thumb :
The Word should be A Distinct & Familiar Noun,
Like A Common Animal or Object, Or Very Unique Idea.
It should consist of Two or Three Syllables,
But Not Two or More Distinct Words that Make One Word.
e.g.; Bad Examples :
Eyeball may be thought to be Eye Ball or E-B
Iguana for I is bad because it sounds like E-Guana !
Alpha
Beta or Baby
Candy
Delta
Elephant
Fandango
Grape
Hippopotamus
Irish
Juvenile
Kangaroo
Lemonade
Macaroni / Machine
Neurotic
Octopus
Paper
Quasar
Raccoon
Sacred
Teacher
Unicorn
Vampire
Weasel
X-Ray
Yodel
Zebra
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Sentences in Stories or Formal Expositions should Never begin with a Number.
If you'd really like to use a Large Number which demands that it be written out in Digits; Reformulate your Sentence.
68,928 Birds were killed by Darkened Lighthouses last year.
Should become;
Darkened Lighthouses killed 68,928 Birds last year.
Five Cats are being kept in my closet.
Is OK.
I'm keeping Five Cats in my Closet.
Is Better.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Centuries, Decades & Iconographic or Ideological Class Sets should be Written out as Numerals.
The Twentieth Century
The Gadfly Seventies.
The Seventh Division
The First in his Class
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
1st, 8th, 2nd should only be used for dates.
July 1st, 1844
2nd of September
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Use of The Word Percentage.
Whenever an Actual Value is Included; 37%
The Symbol should be used;
But if you're speaking generally;
There is a Larger Percentage of Albinos living in The Refrigerator Crates than Chileans.
Is Preferred.
36 Percent vs 36%
Four Percent vs 4%
Using The Symbol seems A Lot Clearer to me.
Percent refers to A Conceptual Notion
Per Cent is An Abbreviation of The Description of The Calculation.
It is Belabored & Wrong.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Recipes should always use Numerals.
3 Cups.
287 Slightly Heaping
Teaspoons.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Unit Quantities should be Written :
3_Tsp
44_mph
.0183_Å
If A Unit Quantity is Used in A Context which Beggars Ambiguity or Confusion,
Such as When Writing for Attentive Third Graders;
3.26_ly should be 3.26 LightYears
27_kpd should be 27 Kilometers per Day*
- -
* Digression :
Something very fun that my HP 48 will do,
Is Convert 'Regular' Quantities into 'Crazy' Quantities.
60_mph = 1,267,197.46 Fathoms per Day
If i 'Define' a Shoelace as being 27 inches long.
'27_in' 'Shoe' STO
i can then use this new Unit Length
Exactly The Same Way i can use All The Other 'Orthodox' Units !
Speed of Light = 1_c
1_Shoe/yr ( Shoelaces per Year )
CONVERT
Warp One = 1.379 E 16_spy
- -
End Digression
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Avoid Arranging Two Numbers Next to One Another.
Three Four year olds fell in The Well.
It's not quite as confusing as A Double Negative,
But it's Ambiguous Enough to Avoid.
Try;
Three Children, Each of which; was Four years old, fell into The Well.
That sounds awfully labored ( ? )
It would be worse if you'd written;
3 4 year olds fell into The Well.
How about;
Three Preschoolers fell into The Well. The Oldest was Four, The Youngest, Also Four, and The Middle child was Four as well.
Using The Word 'Well' Twice in one Sentence,
with very different meanings is also confusing.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
The Use of Millions, Billions, Trillions ( et. al. )
As mentioned earlier;
Writing out large numbers as Numerals;
Four Billion, Sixtythree Million, Eight Hundred & Twentyone, And Sixteen
Is very confusing;
But—
If you're bandying about vague generalities as part of slur or disingenuous political argument;
Six Quadrillion Democratic Paraplegics are in favor of this Proposition.
Is much better than 6,000,000,000,000,000 Democratic Paraplegics…
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Consistency is The Jingoistic Fanaticism of The Small Minded Albinos or One Legged Sailors, But— You shouldn't Mix Metaphors or Cardinal & Ordinal Numbers just to annoy librarians either.
Use The 'Does is Make a Good Haiku' Rule of Thumb
To judge whether a Sentence is Reasonable or not.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Monday, July 23, 2012
Icons to Share !
i have been wanting to do this for a very long time,
But i just recently thought of a way to do it !
And that is; Share some of the Icons that i've made.
These are File, Folder, Document & Application Icons for The Macintosh OS.
They may well work with other Platforms,
But i'm just guessing.
The problem has always been;
How can i put them on the Interweb so that they are then accessible to someone that finds them?
i have downloaded many Icon Collections from the Interweb,
But they were always on a Website that was Specifically Created to Allow the Browser to download The Set. This Blog doesn't have anything like that !
So then i discovered that i can upload a .zip file to my Google Docs File !
So there it is : Share These Icons !
When you click on that; A pane will come up on a Site Window telling you that
No Preview is Available.
Simply click on the Download Box, and A Folder of More Folders with The Icons will be downloaded to your Computer as a .zip compressed object.
De-zip it and there will be the Folder(s.
There are several hundred Icons; Some of them are 100% Original Material
And more are Images that i've found on the Internet and books and made into very nice cut-out Icons.
Many even have transparent Shadows !
They are all CopyLeft Protected ( Not ! )
Except for the ones that were plaigerized without permission;
In which case;
The Original CopyRights still apply ( !!! )
But i just recently thought of a way to do it !
And that is; Share some of the Icons that i've made.
These are File, Folder, Document & Application Icons for The Macintosh OS.
They may well work with other Platforms,
But i'm just guessing.
The problem has always been;
How can i put them on the Interweb so that they are then accessible to someone that finds them?
i have downloaded many Icon Collections from the Interweb,
But they were always on a Website that was Specifically Created to Allow the Browser to download The Set. This Blog doesn't have anything like that !
So then i discovered that i can upload a .zip file to my Google Docs File !
So there it is : Share These Icons !
When you click on that; A pane will come up on a Site Window telling you that
No Preview is Available.
Simply click on the Download Box, and A Folder of More Folders with The Icons will be downloaded to your Computer as a .zip compressed object.
De-zip it and there will be the Folder(s.
There are several hundred Icons; Some of them are 100% Original Material
And more are Images that i've found on the Internet and books and made into very nice cut-out Icons.
Many even have transparent Shadows !
They are all CopyLeft Protected ( Not ! )
Except for the ones that were plaigerized without permission;
In which case;
The Original CopyRights still apply ( !!! )
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Anti-American Cinema & Flying Saucers
i have been watching some ‘Counter Culture’
( Anti-Western Civilization Propaganda )
Films lately and they leave me very confused and Befuddled.
- - -
Some of The Films :
The Shock Doctrine ( Based on The Book by Naomi Klein )
The Road to Guantánamo © 2006
No End in Sight ( Exposé of The Ongoing Iraq War ( Circa 2001+
Tae Guk Gi : The Brotherhood of War ( Best Korean War Film
Little Dieter Needs to Fly ( Best Documentary of The Vietnam War
Frank Capra’s WWII : Why we Fight
- - - ( 7 1_h± Films / A Terrific Historical Analysis of WWII
Who Killed Atlanta’s Children / 2000
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
- - - ( Best Intelligent Designer / Intellectual Freedom Film
Mythic Journeys / 2009
911 Taboo
Part One : http://www.livevideo.com/video/genghis6199/1666F9D3661E461EA858D7300117BAEF/911taboo-part-1.aspx
Part Two : http://www.livevideo.com/video/genghis6199/20B1D80FABD140D28DA9B5FFB0A2CB3E/911taboo-part-2.aspx
Loose Change / http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501
- -
Along with These films; i watched some ‘Previews’ from ‘Oscilloscope’ Films;
Which seemed to me to specialize in Fear-Mongering Topics.
There are bad things happening all over The World,
But to make a film that slants The Issues to make them seem worse than they already are;
Is just wrong.
Like The Billy Jack Films; They were just wrong.
The Nightly News is Just Wrong.
i Very Honestly believe that many of The Nightly News, Both Local, National & International;
Routinely, Make Up stories from Whole Cloth.
The most egregious of these are usually spotted when there are no Specific Details included which would help you to find additional information about The Story on The Internet.
Another Technique that The Fear Mongers use is to Include Words & Phrases which allow The Viewer or Listener to Interpret The Story to Any Degree that they’d like.
Such phrases like; ‘Sexual Abuse’ or ‘Indecent Liberties’ allow you to ‘Fill In’ The Story with whatever your Imagination may conjure up.
Democracy is such an interesting Idea in that it seems to represent a Government that is Controlled by The People for Their own Best Interests;
But A Clever Dictatorial System, Such as The One Used by The United States of America, has rigged the Electoral Process to Exclude any Viable Real Candidates by arranging Elections so that A Vote for A Third Party Candidate will effectively “Throw your Vote Away”.
Then once a Controlled Democratic System is in Place;
The Media Controls The Opinions of The Damp Masses so that their ‘Independent Views’ are Those that were Implanted in them by The Controlling 1%.
Democracies are The Most Effective Way for a Dictator to Enforce a Iron Fisted Control Over a Population,
Because The Vassals aren’t fully aware that they’re Slaves to The Best Interests of Their Masters.
- -
Another thing that The Local News Outlets do occasionally is run a story about a Bank Robber that they’d like The Public’s Help in Identifying.
The Problem is; The Surveillance Picture they use is of The Most Horrible Quality, And presented as a Tiny Square in one Corner of The Screen, while The News Reader covers half of it with their own head.
How Difficult would it be to Bring it up, Enhance it a little, Correct for Lighting, Sharpen The Edges & Color and Display it Full Screen?
Because The Purpose is Not to Identify anyone. There may not have even been a bona fide Bank Robbery in this case. It was all staged to get The Public to call in with dozens or hundreds of ‘Tips’ because they thought that maybe The Suspect that they were looking for, was The Disheveled Foreign Looking Guy that lives down The hallway from them. The Police are actually just Phishing for Future Criminals, because their repository of ‘The Usual Suspects’ has been depleted for some reason.
- - -
The Most Obvious Premise that must be considered when watching films like this;
Is : How True are They?
They seem very true, but they are also so astonishingly divergent from
‘What we are Told’
That any reasonable person or reasonable cynic or reasonable debunker or Contrarian
Should pause and wonder; What is True?
What is Really True.
Just how evil is our own government?
What can i do about it?
Have i been bought off,
Has my Silence been purchased in The form of Minimal Affluence?
i have for a very long time had this awareness that The News is Very Deceptive.
The real test that ‘Citizens’ should follow, when wondering; What is True - - -
Is : How does what i see on The News compare with What i Know to be True,
Based on My Personal Experiences ( ? )
In my corner of The World;
Things are remarkably sedate.
The Terrible things that have happened to me,
Are not at all Terrible when compared to The Terrible Things that The News Tells me are happening in Other Places in The World.
What does this mean?
Am i; By shear luck, By some Statistical Fluke, By Raw Chance
One of The Luckiest People in The World ?
Yes.
i acknowledge that.
i am very, very lucky.
Very Fortunate.
Very, Very Fortunate.
In The Top ( ? ) 5% of The Luckiest People in The World.
i am also in The Top 3% of The Smartest People in The World.
Is that related ?
It often seems to me that dumb people lead unfortunate lives,
But i can also site many dumb people that are just as lucky as i am,
or even luckier.
i have often wondered why smart people allow dumb, crazy, evil people
run The World.
And i suspect - -
That it may be - -
That ( like me ( ? ) ) they ( The Smart People ) tend to believe that
The World Exists - -
Out there.
That is not my world.
i am able to control my world,
No matter how crazy The world - out there - is.
It is sad.
Very Sad.
But what can i do about it.
i also believe ( ? )
( or want to believe )
That Consciousness = Proves = that The World is very different
Than The Way it Appears to be.
i can ( easily ) imagine a world of robots
That behave - Exactly - ( Exactly, Exactly )
Like we do; But are not Conscious.
They are Robots.
They are programmed to make art,
Seduce Innocent Victims and Abuse their Trust,
Senselessly murder other robots,
Wage Environmental Destruction without remorse,
Grow Old and Feeble,
Fall into Traffic and Flail about as Their Oil Runs from their Joints.
But they do so without ever being aware of their own existence.
Because they’re just machines.
Our Consciousness makes The Material World very odd.
And it may be ( ? )
That this means that all The Woe in The World
Is merely Superficial Fluff.
Very Sad Fluff.
What The Angels believe to be Important,
Is very different than what we mortals believe to be Important.
The Mindless Suffering, & Horrible Deaths,
The Loss of Cultural Artifacts,
The Wholesale Slaughter of The Oceans Fauna,
The Endless Harvesting of Cattle for Hamburgers,
The Production of Newspapers which Defile entire Forests,
The Screaming of Children all Night Long,
The Images of Bellies blown open on Television,
The Glasses of Spilled Milk and Hysterical Mothers - -
Are all drawn from a very high stack of 3 x 5 cards
That are distributed to The Souls whose real existence
And Ultimate Meaning, are Incomprehensibly Unknowable.
Am i expected to Make The Universe Perfect ( ? )
Is that what gawd wants from me.
( ? )
Or is it all for nothing.
Are we living in a universe that is so astonishingly wry
That it allows us to be aware that we are robots
That can only watch our destinies play out,
Forbidden to Change anything by The Laws of Cause & Effect
That were set into Motion at The Beginning of Time.
If i can change Destiny,
What can i do to force everyone to behave ( ? )
Isn’t that what’s causing The Problem now ?
It may be That Many Soldiers simply enjoy The Thrill of being given Permission to Play Out all Their Morality Free Desires,
But many Others, And their Leaders, May actually believe that they are doing some Good,
Possibly Not for The Nationals that they’re murdering,
But for Some ‘Nobel’ Cause or Ideology that Will, In Time,
Make The World a Better Place.
You can’t Force People to be Good.
You can’t Kill all of your Enemies.
It has been suggested that The Great Problem with The World.
Or - - That Principle Causal Factor which is Responsible for Most Wars;
Is that Many, Otherwise, Reasonably Intelligent Leaders & Their Supporters,
Is that they are unable to Distinguish between The Allegories of Their Myths
And Historical Reality.
This may seem far fetched;
But many people actually do Believe That The Foundations of Their Religion
Or Political Ideology, or Economic Genesis are Historical Truths,
Set down by Myn, Gawds or Giants whose wisdom & knowledge far exceeds our own nowadays, and must be yielded to; At all costs.
Perhaps The Solution of ‘Doing Good’
Which never seems to work out very well,
Is to Forfeit The Idea that :
Either You’re Part of The Solution by Acting Decisively
Or you’re part of The Problem by choosing Inaction.
Wake up every morning with The Intention of Making a Difference in The World.
Maybe some days, you should just let The World remain on it’s own course.
‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ taught us that being a strong causative Agent in The World, might just be, nothing more that taking up space.
Maybe a Healthy Appreciation for Apathy & Laziness
Is The Real Solution for All The Ills of The World.
One must always strive to Do Good in your Personal Lives.
But when you choose to Do Someone Else’s Good for Their Purposes,
It may be that your Efforts are being Disingenuously Manipulated.
( ? )
How have people that have succeeded in doing real, lasting Good
Accomplished this?
With Armies?
By Setting a Good Example?
By Using Their Personal Wealth to Build a Dream Reality?
By Doing Good as An Individual and allowing others to come along & help?
It is easy to imagine that A Big Problem requires a Big Solution;
But maybe only small Solutions are successful at Weathering Away a Canyon or Building a Mountain.
Hitting a computer with a hammer might get it working again,
For a little while;
But any Problem that requires that you have to constantly be hitting it with a Hammer,
That Problem requires a New Remedial Solution.
Capitalism is like that; It may seem like a good Economic Model on Paper,
With it’s Invisible Hands, Entrepreneurial Spirit, Unlimited Wealth, The Mass Production of Automobiles & Cheap Electronics, Ponzi Schemes, Stock Market Investors, Expanding Bubbles & A Manageable Inflationary Rate;
But it has to be Regulated.
You can’t just allow Capitalism to run Amok.
You have to stand over it with a Hammer and Constantly knock it back into balance or it will destroy itself.
The Trouble with The World is not that people are too Greedy,
The Trouble with The World is that People are Not Greedy Enough.
Babynous
Most Wealthy people are perfectly content to squander great resources,
Make a tiny Fraction of What hard work could provide for them,
And run away when things go Appallingly Wrong.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
How to Proceed:
Do Good on A Personal Scale.
Tell Stories that Encourage your Listeners to Relate to Indomitable Questions.
Refuse to Participate in Other Peoples Dreams that you Aren’t fully Committed to.
Become a Contrarian. ( Everything you Hear or See or Read is Wrong )
Everything i’m telling you now is Wrong !
(
This is not a Paradox, It is a Recursive Infinite Loop,
Which you can exit at any time;
by simply giving up on at random intervals.
)
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Severe Digression & Tangental Addendum :
The Local World is actually a pretty nice place.
We’ve got The Parks, Libraries, Netflix, Online Porn, Clean Sheets, Cheap Bread, Donut Shops & Free Kittens.
You have to be fairly reckless to bring down The Man to bust you for smoking pot in your own home, or Sodomizing your Wife.
If you keep a low profile, you can usually indulge yourself with any personal thoughts & fantasies that you’d like to pollute your own soul with.
i would like to further believe that most of The lunatics in charge want to keep a low profile themselves and participate in a little harmless graft or authoritative shenanigans from time to time, but mostly, they try to keep under The Radar.
Things get done.
Occasionally things slip out of Control and you’ve got a full blown Fiasco,
But as Fiasco’s go, most are pretty benign.
- -
There is one crazy thing though that worries me a little bit.
And that is: Flying Saucers.
i believe that there is sufficient evidence to support The Idea that there is ‘Something’ to The Reports of Flying Saucers, and The Sundry of Flying Saucer Peripheral Activities.
i would also like to believe that The Shadow Government, Not The Clowns that regularly appear in Public; But The True & Genuinely Secret Illuminatii, By Whatever it’s Correct Name is; Want to Preserve The World and Care for it in A Responsible Manner.
The Fact that they occasionally fail to do this; Would seem to infer that they’re not as All Powerful as some would Assume that they are - -
Or; It may be that These Slips that we are aware of, Are tiny insignificant irregularities that have slipped by in The course of Saving us from Truly Unimaginable Disasters !
The Original Point though; About Flying Saucers, Is that maybe ‘They’ know The Greater Truth about them and The Real Truth is Astonishingly Horrific.
The Sort of thing that is Never even hinted at in The Many Quixotic Books & Grossly Irresponsible UFO Literature.
Some may say; ‘We want to know The Truth, We can handle it!’
But what if there was a very reasonable possibility that The Damp Masses couldn’t handle it. What if many of our elemental social institutions collapsed and life itself became deeply inconsolable if This Truth were widely disseminated?
Once The Truth is Revealed, You can never take it back.
What might this truth be?
That are Other ‘People’ on Other Planets is very benign.
i can’t really imagine this offending anyone.
But what if it turned out that everything we believe to be true,
Concerning Physics, Ethics, Social & Economic Systems, Mathematics & even Aesthetics was Very Wrong.
What if The Truth about Aliens included The Fact that Our Consciousness was not ‘Real’ Consciousness. That The Consciousness of all The Aliens was so Different from ours that we were like Goldfish or Tubeworms.
All our hopes of finding Any kind of Grandiose Spiritual Enlightenment was deeply laughable. We could no more find The Truth of Physics or Merge with The Mind of Gawd than could a paperclip.
What if The Aliens were Farmers and we Were their Livestock?
What if Our Reality was A Screen Saver on An Alien’s Computer?
What if Our Gawd was a 9_year old girl using a Toy like Mattel’s Thing Maker or An E-Z Bake Oven to Create our Universe?
What if it were proven ( ? ) that Conscious can survive outside the body, and that we become embodied because The True Reality is very much like our Dreams, Without anything to stand on, or connect with on a reliable basis.
What if were That our Angelic Guardians have somehow found a way for us to live in short spurts on an Artificial World where things possess a modicum of continuance & immutability so that simple minds such as ours can sit and rest for a little while.
And that life is eternal, but not Evolutionary.
Our souls go on & on forever, without ever improving in a given direction, without becoming better in any sense, without collecting greater wisdom or knowledge, but just plodding along, time without end, enduring The same old shit without reprise.
Would you want to =Know= That ?
The Reality Masters may seem harsh at times,
The World may seem unjust & cruel,
But that may be because Reality is Unjust & Cruel.
Morality & Fairness are The Illusions that Children cling to.
Whatever seems nice right now, hang on to that,
Stop and smell The donuts along The path to everlasting Tepidity.
( Anti-Western Civilization Propaganda )
Films lately and they leave me very confused and Befuddled.
- - -
Some of The Films :
The Shock Doctrine ( Based on The Book by Naomi Klein )
The Road to Guantánamo © 2006
No End in Sight ( Exposé of The Ongoing Iraq War ( Circa 2001+
Tae Guk Gi : The Brotherhood of War ( Best Korean War Film
Little Dieter Needs to Fly ( Best Documentary of The Vietnam War
Frank Capra’s WWII : Why we Fight
- - - ( 7 1_h± Films / A Terrific Historical Analysis of WWII
Who Killed Atlanta’s Children / 2000
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
- - - ( Best Intelligent Designer / Intellectual Freedom Film
Mythic Journeys / 2009
911 Taboo
Part One : http://www.livevideo.com/video/genghis6199/1666F9D3661E461EA858D7300117BAEF/911taboo-part-1.aspx
Part Two : http://www.livevideo.com/video/genghis6199/20B1D80FABD140D28DA9B5FFB0A2CB3E/911taboo-part-2.aspx
Loose Change / http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501
- -
Along with These films; i watched some ‘Previews’ from ‘Oscilloscope’ Films;
Which seemed to me to specialize in Fear-Mongering Topics.
There are bad things happening all over The World,
But to make a film that slants The Issues to make them seem worse than they already are;
Is just wrong.
Like The Billy Jack Films; They were just wrong.
The Nightly News is Just Wrong.
i Very Honestly believe that many of The Nightly News, Both Local, National & International;
Routinely, Make Up stories from Whole Cloth.
The most egregious of these are usually spotted when there are no Specific Details included which would help you to find additional information about The Story on The Internet.
Another Technique that The Fear Mongers use is to Include Words & Phrases which allow The Viewer or Listener to Interpret The Story to Any Degree that they’d like.
Such phrases like; ‘Sexual Abuse’ or ‘Indecent Liberties’ allow you to ‘Fill In’ The Story with whatever your Imagination may conjure up.
Democracy is such an interesting Idea in that it seems to represent a Government that is Controlled by The People for Their own Best Interests;
But A Clever Dictatorial System, Such as The One Used by The United States of America, has rigged the Electoral Process to Exclude any Viable Real Candidates by arranging Elections so that A Vote for A Third Party Candidate will effectively “Throw your Vote Away”.
Then once a Controlled Democratic System is in Place;
The Media Controls The Opinions of The Damp Masses so that their ‘Independent Views’ are Those that were Implanted in them by The Controlling 1%.
Democracies are The Most Effective Way for a Dictator to Enforce a Iron Fisted Control Over a Population,
Because The Vassals aren’t fully aware that they’re Slaves to The Best Interests of Their Masters.
- -
Another thing that The Local News Outlets do occasionally is run a story about a Bank Robber that they’d like The Public’s Help in Identifying.
The Problem is; The Surveillance Picture they use is of The Most Horrible Quality, And presented as a Tiny Square in one Corner of The Screen, while The News Reader covers half of it with their own head.
How Difficult would it be to Bring it up, Enhance it a little, Correct for Lighting, Sharpen The Edges & Color and Display it Full Screen?
Because The Purpose is Not to Identify anyone. There may not have even been a bona fide Bank Robbery in this case. It was all staged to get The Public to call in with dozens or hundreds of ‘Tips’ because they thought that maybe The Suspect that they were looking for, was The Disheveled Foreign Looking Guy that lives down The hallway from them. The Police are actually just Phishing for Future Criminals, because their repository of ‘The Usual Suspects’ has been depleted for some reason.
- - -
The Most Obvious Premise that must be considered when watching films like this;
Is : How True are They?
They seem very true, but they are also so astonishingly divergent from
‘What we are Told’
That any reasonable person or reasonable cynic or reasonable debunker or Contrarian
Should pause and wonder; What is True?
What is Really True.
Just how evil is our own government?
What can i do about it?
Have i been bought off,
Has my Silence been purchased in The form of Minimal Affluence?
i have for a very long time had this awareness that The News is Very Deceptive.
The real test that ‘Citizens’ should follow, when wondering; What is True - - -
Is : How does what i see on The News compare with What i Know to be True,
Based on My Personal Experiences ( ? )
In my corner of The World;
Things are remarkably sedate.
The Terrible things that have happened to me,
Are not at all Terrible when compared to The Terrible Things that The News Tells me are happening in Other Places in The World.
What does this mean?
Am i; By shear luck, By some Statistical Fluke, By Raw Chance
One of The Luckiest People in The World ?
Yes.
i acknowledge that.
i am very, very lucky.
Very Fortunate.
Very, Very Fortunate.
In The Top ( ? ) 5% of The Luckiest People in The World.
i am also in The Top 3% of The Smartest People in The World.
Is that related ?
It often seems to me that dumb people lead unfortunate lives,
But i can also site many dumb people that are just as lucky as i am,
or even luckier.
i have often wondered why smart people allow dumb, crazy, evil people
run The World.
And i suspect - -
That it may be - -
That ( like me ( ? ) ) they ( The Smart People ) tend to believe that
The World Exists - -
Out there.
That is not my world.
i am able to control my world,
No matter how crazy The world - out there - is.
It is sad.
Very Sad.
But what can i do about it.
i also believe ( ? )
( or want to believe )
That Consciousness = Proves = that The World is very different
Than The Way it Appears to be.
i can ( easily ) imagine a world of robots
That behave - Exactly - ( Exactly, Exactly )
Like we do; But are not Conscious.
They are Robots.
They are programmed to make art,
Seduce Innocent Victims and Abuse their Trust,
Senselessly murder other robots,
Wage Environmental Destruction without remorse,
Grow Old and Feeble,
Fall into Traffic and Flail about as Their Oil Runs from their Joints.
But they do so without ever being aware of their own existence.
Because they’re just machines.
Our Consciousness makes The Material World very odd.
And it may be ( ? )
That this means that all The Woe in The World
Is merely Superficial Fluff.
Very Sad Fluff.
What The Angels believe to be Important,
Is very different than what we mortals believe to be Important.
The Mindless Suffering, & Horrible Deaths,
The Loss of Cultural Artifacts,
The Wholesale Slaughter of The Oceans Fauna,
The Endless Harvesting of Cattle for Hamburgers,
The Production of Newspapers which Defile entire Forests,
The Screaming of Children all Night Long,
The Images of Bellies blown open on Television,
The Glasses of Spilled Milk and Hysterical Mothers - -
Are all drawn from a very high stack of 3 x 5 cards
That are distributed to The Souls whose real existence
And Ultimate Meaning, are Incomprehensibly Unknowable.
Am i expected to Make The Universe Perfect ( ? )
Is that what gawd wants from me.
( ? )
Or is it all for nothing.
Are we living in a universe that is so astonishingly wry
That it allows us to be aware that we are robots
That can only watch our destinies play out,
Forbidden to Change anything by The Laws of Cause & Effect
That were set into Motion at The Beginning of Time.
If i can change Destiny,
What can i do to force everyone to behave ( ? )
Isn’t that what’s causing The Problem now ?
It may be That Many Soldiers simply enjoy The Thrill of being given Permission to Play Out all Their Morality Free Desires,
But many Others, And their Leaders, May actually believe that they are doing some Good,
Possibly Not for The Nationals that they’re murdering,
But for Some ‘Nobel’ Cause or Ideology that Will, In Time,
Make The World a Better Place.
You can’t Force People to be Good.
You can’t Kill all of your Enemies.
It has been suggested that The Great Problem with The World.
Or - - That Principle Causal Factor which is Responsible for Most Wars;
Is that Many, Otherwise, Reasonably Intelligent Leaders & Their Supporters,
Is that they are unable to Distinguish between The Allegories of Their Myths
And Historical Reality.
This may seem far fetched;
But many people actually do Believe That The Foundations of Their Religion
Or Political Ideology, or Economic Genesis are Historical Truths,
Set down by Myn, Gawds or Giants whose wisdom & knowledge far exceeds our own nowadays, and must be yielded to; At all costs.
Perhaps The Solution of ‘Doing Good’
Which never seems to work out very well,
Is to Forfeit The Idea that :
Either You’re Part of The Solution by Acting Decisively
Or you’re part of The Problem by choosing Inaction.
Wake up every morning with The Intention of Making a Difference in The World.
Maybe some days, you should just let The World remain on it’s own course.
‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ taught us that being a strong causative Agent in The World, might just be, nothing more that taking up space.
Maybe a Healthy Appreciation for Apathy & Laziness
Is The Real Solution for All The Ills of The World.
One must always strive to Do Good in your Personal Lives.
But when you choose to Do Someone Else’s Good for Their Purposes,
It may be that your Efforts are being Disingenuously Manipulated.
( ? )
How have people that have succeeded in doing real, lasting Good
Accomplished this?
With Armies?
By Setting a Good Example?
By Using Their Personal Wealth to Build a Dream Reality?
By Doing Good as An Individual and allowing others to come along & help?
It is easy to imagine that A Big Problem requires a Big Solution;
But maybe only small Solutions are successful at Weathering Away a Canyon or Building a Mountain.
Hitting a computer with a hammer might get it working again,
For a little while;
But any Problem that requires that you have to constantly be hitting it with a Hammer,
That Problem requires a New Remedial Solution.
Capitalism is like that; It may seem like a good Economic Model on Paper,
With it’s Invisible Hands, Entrepreneurial Spirit, Unlimited Wealth, The Mass Production of Automobiles & Cheap Electronics, Ponzi Schemes, Stock Market Investors, Expanding Bubbles & A Manageable Inflationary Rate;
But it has to be Regulated.
You can’t just allow Capitalism to run Amok.
You have to stand over it with a Hammer and Constantly knock it back into balance or it will destroy itself.
The Trouble with The World is not that people are too Greedy,
The Trouble with The World is that People are Not Greedy Enough.
Babynous
Most Wealthy people are perfectly content to squander great resources,
Make a tiny Fraction of What hard work could provide for them,
And run away when things go Appallingly Wrong.
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
How to Proceed:
Do Good on A Personal Scale.
Tell Stories that Encourage your Listeners to Relate to Indomitable Questions.
Refuse to Participate in Other Peoples Dreams that you Aren’t fully Committed to.
Become a Contrarian. ( Everything you Hear or See or Read is Wrong )
Everything i’m telling you now is Wrong !
(
This is not a Paradox, It is a Recursive Infinite Loop,
Which you can exit at any time;
by simply giving up on at random intervals.
)
: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : o
Severe Digression & Tangental Addendum :
The Local World is actually a pretty nice place.
We’ve got The Parks, Libraries, Netflix, Online Porn, Clean Sheets, Cheap Bread, Donut Shops & Free Kittens.
You have to be fairly reckless to bring down The Man to bust you for smoking pot in your own home, or Sodomizing your Wife.
If you keep a low profile, you can usually indulge yourself with any personal thoughts & fantasies that you’d like to pollute your own soul with.
i would like to further believe that most of The lunatics in charge want to keep a low profile themselves and participate in a little harmless graft or authoritative shenanigans from time to time, but mostly, they try to keep under The Radar.
Things get done.
Occasionally things slip out of Control and you’ve got a full blown Fiasco,
But as Fiasco’s go, most are pretty benign.
- -
There is one crazy thing though that worries me a little bit.
And that is: Flying Saucers.
i believe that there is sufficient evidence to support The Idea that there is ‘Something’ to The Reports of Flying Saucers, and The Sundry of Flying Saucer Peripheral Activities.
i would also like to believe that The Shadow Government, Not The Clowns that regularly appear in Public; But The True & Genuinely Secret Illuminatii, By Whatever it’s Correct Name is; Want to Preserve The World and Care for it in A Responsible Manner.
The Fact that they occasionally fail to do this; Would seem to infer that they’re not as All Powerful as some would Assume that they are - -
Or; It may be that These Slips that we are aware of, Are tiny insignificant irregularities that have slipped by in The course of Saving us from Truly Unimaginable Disasters !
The Original Point though; About Flying Saucers, Is that maybe ‘They’ know The Greater Truth about them and The Real Truth is Astonishingly Horrific.
The Sort of thing that is Never even hinted at in The Many Quixotic Books & Grossly Irresponsible UFO Literature.
Some may say; ‘We want to know The Truth, We can handle it!’
But what if there was a very reasonable possibility that The Damp Masses couldn’t handle it. What if many of our elemental social institutions collapsed and life itself became deeply inconsolable if This Truth were widely disseminated?
Once The Truth is Revealed, You can never take it back.
What might this truth be?
That are Other ‘People’ on Other Planets is very benign.
i can’t really imagine this offending anyone.
But what if it turned out that everything we believe to be true,
Concerning Physics, Ethics, Social & Economic Systems, Mathematics & even Aesthetics was Very Wrong.
What if The Truth about Aliens included The Fact that Our Consciousness was not ‘Real’ Consciousness. That The Consciousness of all The Aliens was so Different from ours that we were like Goldfish or Tubeworms.
All our hopes of finding Any kind of Grandiose Spiritual Enlightenment was deeply laughable. We could no more find The Truth of Physics or Merge with The Mind of Gawd than could a paperclip.
What if The Aliens were Farmers and we Were their Livestock?
What if Our Reality was A Screen Saver on An Alien’s Computer?
What if Our Gawd was a 9_year old girl using a Toy like Mattel’s Thing Maker or An E-Z Bake Oven to Create our Universe?
What if it were proven ( ? ) that Conscious can survive outside the body, and that we become embodied because The True Reality is very much like our Dreams, Without anything to stand on, or connect with on a reliable basis.
What if were That our Angelic Guardians have somehow found a way for us to live in short spurts on an Artificial World where things possess a modicum of continuance & immutability so that simple minds such as ours can sit and rest for a little while.
And that life is eternal, but not Evolutionary.
Our souls go on & on forever, without ever improving in a given direction, without becoming better in any sense, without collecting greater wisdom or knowledge, but just plodding along, time without end, enduring The same old shit without reprise.
Would you want to =Know= That ?
The Reality Masters may seem harsh at times,
The World may seem unjust & cruel,
But that may be because Reality is Unjust & Cruel.
Morality & Fairness are The Illusions that Children cling to.
Whatever seems nice right now, hang on to that,
Stop and smell The donuts along The path to everlasting Tepidity.
Friday, May 25, 2012
Only Atheists will be allowed into Heaven
This is a very simple idea; Gawd wants only The Most Dynamic Souls in Heaven, Such that only Those That are Willing to Defy The Will of Gawd’s Judgement to Seek Out their Own Personal Discoveries of Righteousness— Will be deemed worthy of Heaven.
“Only Atheists will be allowed into Heaven.”
The Babynous Cult : The MailArt Phase
It seems to me that Gawd will want to fill Heaven with only the Noblest Souls and to do so, S’he/It has arranged for this World to be Mislead by various Religious Dogma's that are specifically designed to bring forth the most mealy minded, fatuous pedestrians, by insisting that the only way to get into Heaven is to perform the most specious, unreasonable, self destructive & socially ruinous acts that may be reasonably expected of them... such as mutilating your genitals, persecuting the weak & defenseless, sticking your head in a bucket, or espousing pure gibberish...
Anyone that betrays this agenda will be summarily sent into eternal damnation...!
Thus; Only the bravest, courageous & dauntless that avert themselves from the damp masses & social norms predicated by the established orders, will be worthy of that which they have rejected, to seek a greater, or true provenance of justice & knowledge.
A few Thoughts on The Art of Lying
The Art of Lying
The Curious Thing About The Most Honorable People & The Best Liars,
Is that Both Nearly Always Tell The Truth.
- -
It is only The Careless, Thoughtless Liar that Compulsively Lies without concern for how Viable their Lies will be Held by Others for Any Reasonable Length of Time.
- -
Why Do People Lie?
To Save someone’s Feelings.
To Escape Responsibility for Some Negligence or Malfeasance.
To Simplify A Narrative that is UnNecessarily Complicated.
To Spice Up an Otherwise Tedious Narrative.
To Fill in Gaps that A Narrative may Need to Remain Convincing.
To Make a Narrative More Memorable by Adding Forgotten Details.
- -
Strategies of Successful Lying :
Benjamin Franklin may have been on to something when he suggested that no one has such a reliable memory to be a successful Liar; So that Rule One for Telling Successful Lies is to Tell as Few Lies as Possible.
The Most Egregious Mistake that OJ Simpson made when he was being Sued by The Estates of his Alleged Victims, was to compulsively lie about his ill treatment of his ExWife; Nicole Brown-Simpson. What he should have done is Remorsefully admitted to frequently beating her, and perhaps routinely threatening her life. This would have taken The Punch out of his accusers argument, by portraying him as a psychopathic liar. This Alternative Strategy would have painted him as a cruel & callous husband, but they would necessarily have had to construct a new path toward Nicole’s Murder. Plenty of husbands routinely beat their wives without murdering them. This alone would not provide The Causative Link that his compulsive lying tacitly lead to when he denied murdering her. He lied about The Abuse, He must necessarily be lying about The Murder.
Is it always best to Scrupulously Tell The Truth, Up until The Big Lie.
You might be thinking that if you freely admit to all The Circumstances leading up to A Given Crime, You are essentially admitting The Crime as Well, Although you Deny it.
But Curiously; The Causality leading up to The Crime is only Circumstantial. It may suggest that you are Guilty, But if this can be later proved, Your denial of these circumstances will only The More Strongly Infer that you were Guilty of The Crime as Well.
“Yes; I went to Visit The Victim moments before she was Discovered Murdered, But She was Dead when I Entered Her Room, This would Explain why there was blood on my Hands & Clothes.”
Telling The Truth when Investigators are expecting you to lie will invariably confuse them. i have found this to be remarkably true time & time again.
If you’re going to Lie About Details to Assist A Thin Narrative, Make a Reasonable Effort to Add only Elements that Can’t be Verified or Disproved. This can be very tricky, As some Investigators are driven to substantiate or refute these very details that they believe make your narrative either true or false in its entirety.
It is simply inexcusable to ever tell a transparent lie. All lies should be unverifiable one way or The Other.
If you’re required to Tell A Story over & over; Telling The Truth becomes your best Friend, And Be Sure to Thoroughly Visualize The Faux Elements so that they may be Easily recalled again & again. Investigators are looking for two divergent tell-tale elements of a False Narrative— And these are; A Story that is Either too Inconsistent or UnNaturally Consistent. Striking just The Right Balance that an Ordinary Person will fall into when telling an entirely true story is The Big Trick. If The Investigators are convinced that you’re guilty, perhaps because you are in fact guilty, They will never be satisfied with your Consistency or Expected Inconsistencies. If this is The Case; Just Stick to your Foundation of Innocence, And This is Very Important; DO NOT Try to Explain any Inconsistencies or Contradictions that they insist you’ve made. Instead; Insist that they have misunderstood you, and recall The Story again, keeping it as Vanilla Flavored as possible.
As a General Rule: Never agree to be interrogated by The Police or Some Such. You may want to preface any request of this sort by insisting that you would like to cooperate with them, but you’re concerned that they are not entirely interested in The Actual Truth, But merely Closing a Case that they are unwilling to perform a thorough & responsible investigation of. “I am innocent of your accusations, but I have come to believe that you are only interested in twisting any statements that I may make to fit your ill-conceived thesis.”
The Curious Thing About The Most Honorable People & The Best Liars,
Is that Both Nearly Always Tell The Truth.
- -
It is only The Careless, Thoughtless Liar that Compulsively Lies without concern for how Viable their Lies will be Held by Others for Any Reasonable Length of Time.
- -
Why Do People Lie?
To Save someone’s Feelings.
To Escape Responsibility for Some Negligence or Malfeasance.
To Simplify A Narrative that is UnNecessarily Complicated.
To Spice Up an Otherwise Tedious Narrative.
To Fill in Gaps that A Narrative may Need to Remain Convincing.
To Make a Narrative More Memorable by Adding Forgotten Details.
- -
Strategies of Successful Lying :
Benjamin Franklin may have been on to something when he suggested that no one has such a reliable memory to be a successful Liar; So that Rule One for Telling Successful Lies is to Tell as Few Lies as Possible.
The Most Egregious Mistake that OJ Simpson made when he was being Sued by The Estates of his Alleged Victims, was to compulsively lie about his ill treatment of his ExWife; Nicole Brown-Simpson. What he should have done is Remorsefully admitted to frequently beating her, and perhaps routinely threatening her life. This would have taken The Punch out of his accusers argument, by portraying him as a psychopathic liar. This Alternative Strategy would have painted him as a cruel & callous husband, but they would necessarily have had to construct a new path toward Nicole’s Murder. Plenty of husbands routinely beat their wives without murdering them. This alone would not provide The Causative Link that his compulsive lying tacitly lead to when he denied murdering her. He lied about The Abuse, He must necessarily be lying about The Murder.
Is it always best to Scrupulously Tell The Truth, Up until The Big Lie.
You might be thinking that if you freely admit to all The Circumstances leading up to A Given Crime, You are essentially admitting The Crime as Well, Although you Deny it.
But Curiously; The Causality leading up to The Crime is only Circumstantial. It may suggest that you are Guilty, But if this can be later proved, Your denial of these circumstances will only The More Strongly Infer that you were Guilty of The Crime as Well.
“Yes; I went to Visit The Victim moments before she was Discovered Murdered, But She was Dead when I Entered Her Room, This would Explain why there was blood on my Hands & Clothes.”
Telling The Truth when Investigators are expecting you to lie will invariably confuse them. i have found this to be remarkably true time & time again.
If you’re going to Lie About Details to Assist A Thin Narrative, Make a Reasonable Effort to Add only Elements that Can’t be Verified or Disproved. This can be very tricky, As some Investigators are driven to substantiate or refute these very details that they believe make your narrative either true or false in its entirety.
It is simply inexcusable to ever tell a transparent lie. All lies should be unverifiable one way or The Other.
If you’re required to Tell A Story over & over; Telling The Truth becomes your best Friend, And Be Sure to Thoroughly Visualize The Faux Elements so that they may be Easily recalled again & again. Investigators are looking for two divergent tell-tale elements of a False Narrative— And these are; A Story that is Either too Inconsistent or UnNaturally Consistent. Striking just The Right Balance that an Ordinary Person will fall into when telling an entirely true story is The Big Trick. If The Investigators are convinced that you’re guilty, perhaps because you are in fact guilty, They will never be satisfied with your Consistency or Expected Inconsistencies. If this is The Case; Just Stick to your Foundation of Innocence, And This is Very Important; DO NOT Try to Explain any Inconsistencies or Contradictions that they insist you’ve made. Instead; Insist that they have misunderstood you, and recall The Story again, keeping it as Vanilla Flavored as possible.
As a General Rule: Never agree to be interrogated by The Police or Some Such. You may want to preface any request of this sort by insisting that you would like to cooperate with them, but you’re concerned that they are not entirely interested in The Actual Truth, But merely Closing a Case that they are unwilling to perform a thorough & responsible investigation of. “I am innocent of your accusations, but I have come to believe that you are only interested in twisting any statements that I may make to fit your ill-conceived thesis.”
Selling Imaginary Friends ( ? )
Imaginary Friends
There are a few cases ( not many ) in which a schizophrenic person or (x asserts that they can ‘see’ and interact with ‘invisible’ or ‘imaginary’ friends. These imaginary friends seem completely real & solid to them. Sometimes these imaginary characters are friendly, & sometimes they are not. -
Usually; voices and other phenomena like this that are ‘projected’ from a schizophrenics mind, are from their ‘Id’ and not at all friendly. They tell their ‘host’ to get into mischief and so on.
- -
There is some ‘talk’ about how ‘real’ hypnotism is.
Just how ‘real’ is it? Is it merely ‘suggestions’ that would be equivalent to anyone making a suggestion to anyone else, with some small caveat allowing that ‘some people’ are more ‘suggestible’ than others, and ‘some people’ are more ‘influential’ than others. But basically; There is nothing even remotely ‘mystical’ or even ‘mysterious’ about hypnosis.
In those cases where someone does something very ‘kooky’ while under hypnosis, The critics claim that The subject was merely ‘playing along’ with The hypnotist.
This seems somewhat improbable, But— It also seems very improbable that ‘most’ people can be ‘made’ to think, believe and act on what appears to be very gently suggested ‘instructions’. ( ??? )
- -
The Point being :
What if it were possible to set up a Business in which you would ‘sell’ imaginary friends.
These imaginary friends would be fully ‘real’, and The customer would be able to have sex with them, or molest them in any manner that they would so choose. These imaginary friends would also be good, attentive listeners and possibly even do chores around The house. Such chores would be done by The Customer, but they would believe that it was done by their imaginary friend.
In order to ensure that this/these imaginary friends were always imaginary, They may possess some attribute that no ‘real’ person would possess; Such as a Third Eye in their forehead, No hands, or Fewer than The Normal Number of Fingers, Hooves for Feet, Have a Blue or Remarkably Yellow Complexion, Always be Naked without a belly button, or a Stylized Belly Button, or Square Nipples or Whatever.
There are a few cases ( not many ) in which a schizophrenic person or (x asserts that they can ‘see’ and interact with ‘invisible’ or ‘imaginary’ friends. These imaginary friends seem completely real & solid to them. Sometimes these imaginary characters are friendly, & sometimes they are not. -
Usually; voices and other phenomena like this that are ‘projected’ from a schizophrenics mind, are from their ‘Id’ and not at all friendly. They tell their ‘host’ to get into mischief and so on.
- -
There is some ‘talk’ about how ‘real’ hypnotism is.
Just how ‘real’ is it? Is it merely ‘suggestions’ that would be equivalent to anyone making a suggestion to anyone else, with some small caveat allowing that ‘some people’ are more ‘suggestible’ than others, and ‘some people’ are more ‘influential’ than others. But basically; There is nothing even remotely ‘mystical’ or even ‘mysterious’ about hypnosis.
In those cases where someone does something very ‘kooky’ while under hypnosis, The critics claim that The subject was merely ‘playing along’ with The hypnotist.
This seems somewhat improbable, But— It also seems very improbable that ‘most’ people can be ‘made’ to think, believe and act on what appears to be very gently suggested ‘instructions’. ( ??? )
- -
The Point being :
What if it were possible to set up a Business in which you would ‘sell’ imaginary friends.
These imaginary friends would be fully ‘real’, and The customer would be able to have sex with them, or molest them in any manner that they would so choose. These imaginary friends would also be good, attentive listeners and possibly even do chores around The house. Such chores would be done by The Customer, but they would believe that it was done by their imaginary friend.
In order to ensure that this/these imaginary friends were always imaginary, They may possess some attribute that no ‘real’ person would possess; Such as a Third Eye in their forehead, No hands, or Fewer than The Normal Number of Fingers, Hooves for Feet, Have a Blue or Remarkably Yellow Complexion, Always be Naked without a belly button, or a Stylized Belly Button, or Square Nipples or Whatever.
Circumventing Laws to Outlaw Gay Marriage
Circumventing Laws to Outlaw Gay Marriage
Why is The Government in The Marriage Business Anyways?
It seems ( additionally ) that while The Republicans have a platform of giving carte Blanche to Huge Corporations & Other Businesses, insisting that The Government has no place in Regulating their Financial or Environmental Policies, They are Absolutely comfortable micromanaging The Sexual & Personal Preferences of Individual Citizens ( ! )
What Advantages are there to Being Married; Legally;
And can A Couple of Indeterminate Sexual Identity obtain those same Advantages by some other Means?
- -
Might it be ‘Curious’ if The Gay Community simply sidestepped The Marriage Issue by Creating its own ‘Kwanzaa’ Version of Marriage !
And by this; i mean;
A Completely Alternative & Arguably Superiour ‘Joining’ of Committed Souls to take possession of this Sanctity.
Like Blacks stealing The Confederate Flag from The Red Necks and making it Synonymous with their own Black Heritage.
This New Ceremony would be Far More ‘Ceremonial’ than Conventional Marriages,
Casting The Anachronistic Marriage into a Feeble Shadow that Heterosexual Couples have to endure as Second Class Citizens of Soul Binding ( ! )
i just hate The Idea of Gay Marriages settling for weak descriptions of their Fusion,
Such as; Civil Union or some such.
It needs an Entirely New Name :
Such as :
A Ptionturentio Liturgy
The Ressiesse Fusion
A Ountconsi Melding
The Holy Xche Synthesis
A Sacred Deaem Coalescence
Once established; The Couples and An Established Movement, Orchestrated with Legal Council, would form legal or QuasiLegal Arrangements with Various Institutions, Such as Insurance Companies, Medical Facilities and Such that would Recognize these Unions for Convenience or Profit. While The Union may not be State Sanctioned; Any Arrangements made with These Institutions would include provisions that would make them equitable in every Legal Sense.
Then The Gay Community could initiate Legislation to Recognize The Ressiesse Fusion Rituals & Liturgy, as performed by Recognized, Tax Exempt, Religious Orders so as to Grant such Couples all Additional Cultural Benefits.
If Any other Religious or Political Groups were to Suggest that This Institution is Not Marriage and should Not be Recognized as Such, The Proponents of The Ountconsi Melding would agree completely, and remind their critics that they are proposing an Entirely New Custom or Tradition that is not in any form, in competition with Their Religiously Defended Concept of HeteroSexual, Racial Pure, Height & Weight Adjusted, Marriage.
Why is The Government in The Marriage Business Anyways?
It seems ( additionally ) that while The Republicans have a platform of giving carte Blanche to Huge Corporations & Other Businesses, insisting that The Government has no place in Regulating their Financial or Environmental Policies, They are Absolutely comfortable micromanaging The Sexual & Personal Preferences of Individual Citizens ( ! )
What Advantages are there to Being Married; Legally;
And can A Couple of Indeterminate Sexual Identity obtain those same Advantages by some other Means?
- -
Might it be ‘Curious’ if The Gay Community simply sidestepped The Marriage Issue by Creating its own ‘Kwanzaa’ Version of Marriage !
And by this; i mean;
A Completely Alternative & Arguably Superiour ‘Joining’ of Committed Souls to take possession of this Sanctity.
Like Blacks stealing The Confederate Flag from The Red Necks and making it Synonymous with their own Black Heritage.
This New Ceremony would be Far More ‘Ceremonial’ than Conventional Marriages,
Casting The Anachronistic Marriage into a Feeble Shadow that Heterosexual Couples have to endure as Second Class Citizens of Soul Binding ( ! )
i just hate The Idea of Gay Marriages settling for weak descriptions of their Fusion,
Such as; Civil Union or some such.
It needs an Entirely New Name :
Such as :
A Ptionturentio Liturgy
The Ressiesse Fusion
A Ountconsi Melding
The Holy Xche Synthesis
A Sacred Deaem Coalescence
Once established; The Couples and An Established Movement, Orchestrated with Legal Council, would form legal or QuasiLegal Arrangements with Various Institutions, Such as Insurance Companies, Medical Facilities and Such that would Recognize these Unions for Convenience or Profit. While The Union may not be State Sanctioned; Any Arrangements made with These Institutions would include provisions that would make them equitable in every Legal Sense.
Then The Gay Community could initiate Legislation to Recognize The Ressiesse Fusion Rituals & Liturgy, as performed by Recognized, Tax Exempt, Religious Orders so as to Grant such Couples all Additional Cultural Benefits.
If Any other Religious or Political Groups were to Suggest that This Institution is Not Marriage and should Not be Recognized as Such, The Proponents of The Ountconsi Melding would agree completely, and remind their critics that they are proposing an Entirely New Custom or Tradition that is not in any form, in competition with Their Religiously Defended Concept of HeteroSexual, Racial Pure, Height & Weight Adjusted, Marriage.
Google has Recently Turned to Evil !
Google has recently begun to promote something that it calls : Google+
i'm not sure exactly what this is;
As i have been barred from using it.
Why?
Because i've had the audacity to use my my Real, Legal Name !
- -
Enclosed Rejection Note :
Hello,
After reviewing your appeal, we have determined that your name does not comply with the Google+ Names Policy.
We want users to be able to find each other using the name they already use with their friends, family, and coworkers. For most people this is their legal name, or some variant of it, but we recognize that this isn't always the case, and we allow for other common names in Google+ --- specifically, those that represent an individual with an established online identity with a meaningful following. If you haven't already done so, you can provide us with additional information regarding an established identity by re-submitting an appeal that includes references to where you are known by this name either in online or offline settings.
Note that if you're trying to set up a page for a business, band, group, or other organization, please sign up with your own name and then create a Google+ Page. If you're trying to add an alternate name (such as a nickname, maiden name or name in another script), please sign up with your full name; you can add this alternate name (which will appear alongside your full name) once you've signed up.
You may re-appeal with additional information, if you have not already done so. If you're already using Google+, your current name will continue to be used.
The Google+ team.
- - -
What is my Real, Legal Name ?
It is : Chrstphre Nckls Campbell
OK.
i will admit that it's a tiny bit kooky.
i changed it from something else several years ago;
And occasionally i have to convince people that it's my real name,
But Most People have the common sense to take my word for it.
But Google has somehow gotten it into it's Electronic Brain
that it 'Just Knows' if a Name is Real or Not,
and in many cases that i've found on The Intertube;
Their decisions about what constitutes a real name or not, is pretty crazy.
What is Google(+) really up to?
What is their Hidden Agenda ?
i'm not sure exactly what this is;
As i have been barred from using it.
Why?
Because i've had the audacity to use my my Real, Legal Name !
- -
Enclosed Rejection Note :
Hello,
After reviewing your appeal, we have determined that your name does not comply with the Google+ Names Policy.
We want users to be able to find each other using the name they already use with their friends, family, and coworkers. For most people this is their legal name, or some variant of it, but we recognize that this isn't always the case, and we allow for other common names in Google+ --- specifically, those that represent an individual with an established online identity with a meaningful following. If you haven't already done so, you can provide us with additional information regarding an established identity by re-submitting an appeal that includes references to where you are known by this name either in online or offline settings.
Note that if you're trying to set up a page for a business, band, group, or other organization, please sign up with your own name and then create a Google+ Page. If you're trying to add an alternate name (such as a nickname, maiden name or name in another script), please sign up with your full name; you can add this alternate name (which will appear alongside your full name) once you've signed up.
You may re-appeal with additional information, if you have not already done so. If you're already using Google+, your current name will continue to be used.
The Google+ team.
- - -
What is my Real, Legal Name ?
It is : Chrstphre Nckls Campbell
OK.
i will admit that it's a tiny bit kooky.
i changed it from something else several years ago;
And occasionally i have to convince people that it's my real name,
But Most People have the common sense to take my word for it.
But Google has somehow gotten it into it's Electronic Brain
that it 'Just Knows' if a Name is Real or Not,
and in many cases that i've found on The Intertube;
Their decisions about what constitutes a real name or not, is pretty crazy.
What is Google(+) really up to?
What is their Hidden Agenda ?
Monday, April 16, 2012
Various New Biddles
A )
i've just posted in Google Docs a new 'Fragments' which is a Collection of Story Bits and Ideas for How to Construct a Story; Plus Other Addendums for Stories in General.
The reason that it's in Google Docs and Not here; Is so it may be much Fancier !
B )
i have for a very long time been 'Thoughtful' & 'Troubled' by The Idea of Seeing things.
It seems reasonable enough that A Robot could identify things by a mechanism to which we may attribute how the brain identifies things, but after undergoing a laborous hierarchical analysis to identify things in our visual field, how ( or why ) does the brain then reassemble all these units into our visual field ?
Along with this; i have also become content that it should be quite easily possible to construct within a Desk-Top computer in the very near future a Fractional Reality that is every bit as detailed as our own. This idea is based on the simple observation that any given brain as as 'understanding' of the entire universe, and is only contains those sufficient details that are necessary to navigate through it, plus quite a bit more. And given that the brain is about the size of a small toaster, A Unit of equal size is all that's required for such a 'Fractional Reality' to be simulated on your Home Computer.
This is what i call The Screen Saver Hypothesis.
The Curious thing about this; Is that if it is possible ( allowing that this hypothetical Screen Saver Universe has 'Genuinely Conscious Inhabitants' which we do not 'yet' know how to create ) To Create this Screen Saver Reality so Easily; Then One might Ask ? "Am i living in a Screen Saver Reality?"
Would there be any Way to Determine this?
In theory ( Scenario One ); The Answer is: No.
In theory ( Scenario Two ); The Answer may be: There may be plenty of Good Reasons for Suspecting that we are living in a Screen Saver Universe.
One Preassumption to this is; How different is Our Screen Saver Reality from The Reality that Spawned us?
If it were pretty much the same; Then it may be very difficult to determine this; Assuming that The Reality 'Above' us is in Fact; Really Real.
If it were a Screen Saver Reality Itself; Then The Initial Hypothesis that Our Reality is Quite Different from The Parent 'True' Reality that Created us may allow us to be more Suspect;
As this would allow us to Possibly Assume ( ? ) that Our Reality Contains Numerous Features that Are Impossible in The True Reality.
Are there things in Our Reality that Seem Impossible ?
Like Gravity? or ElectroMagnetism?
While we have 'Described' These Phenomena with Great Quantification, The Underlying Principle that Allows them to 'Work' is Completely Unknown.
As much as Consciousness or;
Seeing.
Does Gravity Work simply because there's a 'Rule' in The Reality Generator that Creates our Sensory Experiences, That says; We Should Stick to The Ground. As such; There is No Underlying Principle behind its functionality, It simply works because it does.
- -
Getting back to 'Seeing' which all the above acted merely as a Preclusion to :
It occurred to me the other day that all this 'Seeing Business' could be quite easily Explained by First Assuming that We are Living in A Screen Saver Reality, In which many 'Impossible' Things happen, And The Solution to how we can Instantaneously Identify and See things is because The Reality Generator -Tells Us What We are Seeing- ( ! )
Since The Reality Generator is Constructing all That we 'See' Anyway; It might as well just go ahead and Tell us what We are Seeing. There's No 'Identifying Things' at all.
It's a One Step Process.
The Reality Generator Creates our Sensory Experiences and We Become Aware of Them without having to 'Sense' Them !
This is a Terrible Cheat, But it explains The Problem of Seeing quite elegantly.
i've just posted in Google Docs a new 'Fragments' which is a Collection of Story Bits and Ideas for How to Construct a Story; Plus Other Addendums for Stories in General.
The reason that it's in Google Docs and Not here; Is so it may be much Fancier !
B )
i have for a very long time been 'Thoughtful' & 'Troubled' by The Idea of Seeing things.
It seems reasonable enough that A Robot could identify things by a mechanism to which we may attribute how the brain identifies things, but after undergoing a laborous hierarchical analysis to identify things in our visual field, how ( or why ) does the brain then reassemble all these units into our visual field ?
Along with this; i have also become content that it should be quite easily possible to construct within a Desk-Top computer in the very near future a Fractional Reality that is every bit as detailed as our own. This idea is based on the simple observation that any given brain as as 'understanding' of the entire universe, and is only contains those sufficient details that are necessary to navigate through it, plus quite a bit more. And given that the brain is about the size of a small toaster, A Unit of equal size is all that's required for such a 'Fractional Reality' to be simulated on your Home Computer.
This is what i call The Screen Saver Hypothesis.
The Curious thing about this; Is that if it is possible ( allowing that this hypothetical Screen Saver Universe has 'Genuinely Conscious Inhabitants' which we do not 'yet' know how to create ) To Create this Screen Saver Reality so Easily; Then One might Ask ? "Am i living in a Screen Saver Reality?"
Would there be any Way to Determine this?
In theory ( Scenario One ); The Answer is: No.
In theory ( Scenario Two ); The Answer may be: There may be plenty of Good Reasons for Suspecting that we are living in a Screen Saver Universe.
One Preassumption to this is; How different is Our Screen Saver Reality from The Reality that Spawned us?
If it were pretty much the same; Then it may be very difficult to determine this; Assuming that The Reality 'Above' us is in Fact; Really Real.
If it were a Screen Saver Reality Itself; Then The Initial Hypothesis that Our Reality is Quite Different from The Parent 'True' Reality that Created us may allow us to be more Suspect;
As this would allow us to Possibly Assume ( ? ) that Our Reality Contains Numerous Features that Are Impossible in The True Reality.
Are there things in Our Reality that Seem Impossible ?
Like Gravity? or ElectroMagnetism?
While we have 'Described' These Phenomena with Great Quantification, The Underlying Principle that Allows them to 'Work' is Completely Unknown.
As much as Consciousness or;
Seeing.
Does Gravity Work simply because there's a 'Rule' in The Reality Generator that Creates our Sensory Experiences, That says; We Should Stick to The Ground. As such; There is No Underlying Principle behind its functionality, It simply works because it does.
- -
Getting back to 'Seeing' which all the above acted merely as a Preclusion to :
It occurred to me the other day that all this 'Seeing Business' could be quite easily Explained by First Assuming that We are Living in A Screen Saver Reality, In which many 'Impossible' Things happen, And The Solution to how we can Instantaneously Identify and See things is because The Reality Generator -Tells Us What We are Seeing- ( ! )
Since The Reality Generator is Constructing all That we 'See' Anyway; It might as well just go ahead and Tell us what We are Seeing. There's No 'Identifying Things' at all.
It's a One Step Process.
The Reality Generator Creates our Sensory Experiences and We Become Aware of Them without having to 'Sense' Them !
This is a Terrible Cheat, But it explains The Problem of Seeing quite elegantly.
Monday, April 02, 2012
Mousy Names
A few weeks ago; i was looking for a list of Mouse Names,
And although i found several lists, i thought each was pretty lame!
So i took many of these lists, reedited them,
Then added quite a few of my own,
And included some other lists as well that seemed applicable.
Unfortunately;
This listing is formatted in a way that This Blog doesn't easily support
So i made it available as a GoogleDoc...
Mousie Names
And although i found several lists, i thought each was pretty lame!
So i took many of these lists, reedited them,
Then added quite a few of my own,
And included some other lists as well that seemed applicable.
Unfortunately;
This listing is formatted in a way that This Blog doesn't easily support
So i made it available as a GoogleDoc...
Mousie Names
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Best New Neologisms
Best New Neologisms
i originally looked into this, To see if i could create a Catalogue of All The Syllables used in The English Language, That i could Then use to Assemble A Definitive Index for Anguish Languish Translations; Which i would then use to Devise a New UnCode based on Anguish Languish, CDB, Bennettian Poetry & Some Original Idea.
While this Examination seems to Demonstrate that The Total Number of Syllables is Manageable; It didn't really find them The Way i was hoping it would.
The Number of English Phonemes is around ( ? ) 42;
i haven't been able find An Unabridged Listing of All Syllables that Represent those Unique Sound Nibblets that i need to use inside a program to search for; And Replace with Alternative Words, Symbols or Change their Visual Structure.
In The Course of Creating A Scratch Program to Find these Syllables & Later Make Convincing Neologisms;
i first Wrote a Program to find The Most Commonly Used 2, 3, 4 & 5 Character Sets.
'in' is The most commonly used 2 Characters in The English Language !
Followed by 'ed', 'en', 'on', 'er', 'es', 'te', 'nt', 'an', 'co', 'de' & 're'.
There were only 427 two Character Sets Found;
And of those, 268 occurred 10 times or more in The Searched Text of About 6000 Words,
And 80 that occurred 100 times or more.
With 'in' Occurring 710 Times.
'ie' occurred nearly 4 times more often than 'ei'.
'ae' occurred 3 Times, 'ea' occurred 240 Times.
'oe'; 17 Times, 'eo'; 9 Times.
'ia'; 88 Times, 'ai'; 134 Times.
'er'; 492 Times, 're'; 367 Times.
The Most Common Three Character Set is 'ing', with 275 Occurrences.
There were only 10 Sets that Occurred more than 100 times.
'ion', 'ent', 'tio', 'con', 'ted', 'ter', 'nce', 'ate', & 'ati'.
There were 653 Sets with 10 or more Occurrences,
from a Total Number of Sets of 2642.
The Most Common Four Character Set was 'tion'; with 151 Occurrences,
From a Total of 5981 Sets.
Only 230 Four Character Sets occurred 10 or more Times.
There were 6953 Five Character Sets; 46 Occurred 10 or more times.
The Most Popular being 'ation', with 69 Occurrences.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
i'd been trying to come up with a New Technique for Creating 'Convincing' Neologisms for some time, without much success.
This latest method uses These Most Commonly Occurring Character Sets to Provide The Reader with 'Familiar' Character Sets that Words are Built From.
The Most Commonly Used Sets were Taken from Each Listing.
- - -
How to Use Neologisms
There are essentially two kinds of Neologisms;
Those that The Reader should be able to discern their meaning from by Examining Their Construction & Context;
And those that Require Substantially More Effort to Figure out.
This List concerns us with The Latter.
Neologisms may be very useful when you want to use a Word, or Set of Words, that Gently Suggest some Meaning, Without Actually Meaning anything.
e.g.;
Pick A Class of Phenomena;
Such as Political Philosophies;
And Exchange All Such Labels to One or Two Neologisms.
This allows that Reader to avoid being entrenched with PreConceived Philosophical or Political Ideologies and simple Define These New Terms however they'd like;
Either Favorably or UnFavorably when Considering The Story's Speaker or Narrator's Exposition.
Henry had been raised as a Fanatical Oapendian and retained many of Their Dogmas after converting to Tivoeanism at The Urging of his second Wife.
This wasn't hard for him to do, as His Father was secretly a Shedefearean, which was The Source Theology of Its Fractional Sects; Tasseatism, Tivoeansim, Ributism & The Marmots of Oarious.
A Random Neologism might also be used as an Adjective.
The Dress was a Wonderful shade of Ument with Flecks of Bright Stingbor.
He often wore is Ilexic Shoes with His Favorite Uncle's Avevely Bowler.
Dr. Ontimar deftly handled The Dedlish Clamp when attaching Mrs. Stituso's Ressei Glands.
Selected Neologisms
Muvirea
Oveblesing
Theating
Rableks
Scument
Ontimar
Undmand
Enerathe
Dattyslar
Leacolompan
Ternath
Courtra
Suhrist
Tyconse
Dedlish
Genether
Temptomple
Stituso
Dinghan
Compaue
Exprected
Renigea
Vepihar
Eadollow
Piingho
Tocounce
Hangai
Rielan
Ually
Uence
Oneun
Ratiepend
Abirect
Misaw
Racive
Joage
Tasseat
Ribut
Favent
Bient
Egowove
Oarious
Gohtande
Piortun
Ortdea
Ighbo
Ryont
Ompli
Ournter
Arilea
Matlar
Oundud
Racturenatio
Uiighring
Indiatte
Ableab
Ideniden
Yeive
Knokessed
Atteother
Entio
Spative
Natio
Carimp
Olatio
Gerption
Appea
Uglar
Essiden
Ather
Ureot
Irable
Iaght
Lanou
Xeessi
Haround
Edids
Horecti
Menust
Milappe
All Generated Neologisms
Ctsin / Essiedit / Imprcou / Tures / Icate / Ghdisp / Scrib / Ntacco / Stedca / Ppxtpose / Hangai / Oapend / Catsse / Ssellow / Iofully / Istrdin / Ncesgene / Therdre / Rielan / Suxperi / Confnin / Concomm / Ually / Araffec / Uence / Eratking / Sccompl / Arrie / Ribucount / Ntenected / Telytend / Ttontr / Ption / Rivesp / Tivoe / Convore / Heavath / Latment / Alknlea / Oneun / Tinters / Noatten / Fulxc / Rtaibount / Sedjelat / Raatter / Ratiepend / Chris / Abirect / Misaw / Ighpende / Misspre / Prhonor / Racive / Mentpend / Ntswn / Struompan / Lleonor / Ecteressi / Cross / Racte / Shedefear / Joage / Restinati / Ienautho / Breaast / Tiended / Glicfor / Entness / Natiexc / Leaclaim / Uadaomm / Aring / Nnemp / Fectchin / Faifdisc / Thers / Ssedef / Bosted / Tasseat / Turearing / Angdeli / Stitu / Arrat / Unter / Ribut / Arititu / Nstinted / Advan / Favent / Hange / Istin / Bient / Nytur / Tivnter / Ustsider / Arirect / Andsated / Uence / Heart / Derabl / Psures / Andett / Deater / Advan / Egowove / Inaiove / Epend / Mpgrand / Press / Ristfo / Oarious / Essed / Dress / Batment / Angdg / Modeles / Descward / Everxpe / Tment / Nsist / Resse / Inter / Catllect / Ritmenfect / Gohtande / Aring / Dengemen / Pptent / Piortun / Consi / Blust / Delinstru / Oustend / Ortdea / Natured / Riscu / Ininbrea / Zette / Evath / Kingies / Acaster / Tempt / Ighbo / Tened / Lonress / Ntiose / Idenocacc / Renning / Ryont / Sideag / Cross / Rrokconfe / Ssese / Ompli / Amnstieighb / Adbor / Avevely / Hinntere / Concdiffe / Istin / Veredit / Tivevely / Leended / Sideisti / Ilexic / Consapp / Weded / Dance / Japrove / Weioadmir / Grascove / Lessso / Exinter / Sionined / Assever / Aring / Rrices / Ortun / Landnstru / Ournter / Encou / Zetrdr / Arilea / Ractend / Restrib / Ssing / Tlmuistr / Buemplo / Endeisc / Eredcompl / Onstere / Omplmis / Risau / Clusi / Ieatte / Tancfully / Seque / Isctitu / Monerate / Ftute / Disco / Edeme / Mploy / Altten / Fecti / Reate / Hoccxperi / Ontind / Enerenc / Ainedi / Stinghbor / Ument / Aineinten / Opinst / Cecal / Imate / Fortu / Tenustr / Ksratiommun / Impol / Ardered / Inten / Iseer / Expomm / Intact / Teuieas / Rsghpress / Dentnger / Ratio / Ceptexccontr / Ctioratio / Tinct / Earfodesir / Ponuely / Itioje / Enddisco / Affec / Enterlea / Appeaminst / Ibually / Dentease / Diffetly / Ininglend / Ityende / Ighboiona / Velyllhed / Muvirea / Indgoained / Stinglleught / Commelat / Ntainstin / Iforteate / Missiepend / Teremisdesir / Icatintion / Atteexp / Mansteje / Ddssirtain / Antdirec / Oveblesing / Onveppire / Esseexce / Ntedgooc / Tractur / Theating / Tiyinghange / Rableks / Sequelow / Scument / Ptnstru / Mpresran / Ncludmar / Ilimoimate / Endedct / Nsttend / Redcorollow / Ritconfe / Ontuntonsid / Monltatt / Ghtercover / Generco / Tenommious / Creaction / Ontimar / Larheaexp / Tentiditio / Racthea / Breaavor / Evaionce / Xpresntent / Scendip / Therksunter / Zesingility / Eneratci / Undmand / Conppshed / Spssesta / Strucica / Utioerate / Essstant / Enerathe / Erinwnnds / Cultistr / Ughtorini / Nstiument / Rtinesear / Tinctdg / Dstiesell / Apessiint / Dattyslar / Leacolompan / Nterents / Ertntent / Admises / Ernssio / Sistcla / Ainecre / Feloside / Ngenstan / Afhararch / Lleolard / Umrmhor / Ternath / Discofecti / Instioun / Amehear / Rlakter / Courtra / Nervent / Lighigini / Oneathe / Mplional / Arnding / Excegssing / Ininxpres / Ediandisclaim / Concands / Intecomme / Ntionreate / Cikintitu / Indientl / Edatter / Zestitu / Tribnish / Ticsswn / Nattrib / Ancesas / Enceowging / Inatiug / Racavelish / Onveain / Ptnfjarit / Foremsid / Maountio / Tuexpre / Areadmini / Wnrcratio / Ortuncr / Inesvoarr / Yesseslu / Suhrist / Ustririn / Rabltance / Tterring / Everlle / Oreboighracte / Compthe / Ngerses / Tyconse / Afterse / Ssesdesi / Secatghter / Erithepre / Oofrpeusion / Llyured / Ectities / Wsative / Ckmentai / Icalnin / Greateious / Ctitlykeint / Dedlish / Temptomple / Genether / Viianplain / Chitions / Ependemplo / Inedchris / Astecar / Eighblan / Siderci / Cknyotion / Icantiinter / Expfllect / Stanvely / Missiarge / Desircom / Msrrising / Areeyfio / Cesactee / Stituso / Conture / Milpseighb / Larrect / Istrimate / Cclongil / Thement / Omedesir / Dinghan / Atterfecti / Junstru / Ionsistr / Issioces / Compaue / Asessed / Eredter / Mbdescr / Atteence / Noouurering / Grandry / Ceptgran / Exprected / Sionvobl / Ssssding / Destsses / Natelectiv / Contiencatio / Tenedatten / Evconfendscrib / Omeangif / Ndedunepend / Strtinmain / Nfption / Intefang / Renigea / Denarrie / Aveeight / Hristft / Thersreate / Theertai / Tocounce / Contkin / Orensttu / Gelleontetenti / Emeinati / Excemploy / Todrcult / Amcultterna / Nsecross / Losesene / Grandiste / Piingho / Fuainlea / Dinands / Meconti / Ssingdl / Eateaieadreate / Oyibtrlity / Overinc / Ruchhrist / Mbentio / Artrable / Eadollow / Adlingativ / Scfinaf / Thersere / Baappro / Xtnceseenst / Edicctatio / Rieninable / Misappea / Ustrcomme / Vepihar / Ntsions / Endedchan
- - - - - - - Second Generation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Matlar / Rable / Oundud / Racturenatio / Itive / Fiance / Atefasere / Rtain / Tterire / Ments / Uiighring / Racount / Ribut / Leauconsi / Naticompa / Natio / Rable / Indiatte / Cttion / Tenem / Monution / Count / Etenter / Ableab / Brpsded / Nesnn / Chanlt / Essener / Hether / Ideniden / Uteell / Yeive / Knokessed / Ribut / Atteother / Inten / Inten / Indated / Entio / Spative / Natio / Gacons / Discens / Tteect / Flned / Ribut / Appea / Carimp / Olatio / Untene / Ctionge / Ringribut / Ption / Extldes / Rindistr / Ratio / Mpame / Nessratio / Dingssed / Gerption / Appea / Commlu / Eraaf / Ionkin / Trssed / Expedes / Afressi / Natio / Appea / Ntalight / Impvi / Earless / Distr / Wnture / Ribut / Horcom / Leaction / Gaected / Ement / Tainnatio / Odance / Iesxe / Ather / Ected / Taination / Fectdisc / Reatribut / Inteution / Biine / Ionsring / Contated / Conte / Nding / Natter / Triren / Contather / Eeratio / Ident / Ghtring / Uglar / Ction / Otcoun / Ectio / Inten / Unappe / Consatio / Mattpress / Essiden / Ather / Ement / Attete / Appesse / Intetribu / Rriac / Nding / Redoseption / Turust / Hantter / Lowhea / Heemen / Compl / Avchar / Ngfeconte / Ratenter / Napress / Tionatte / Oreinter / Deconf / Count / Ureot / Itioact / Comother / Pasion / Blecol / Conte / Ffect / Noiden / Ctepo / Amntatte / Indicen / Ioustribu / Angeconce / Finrtain / Iescontr / Graoo / Ather / Tingribut / Cenneely / Ustawount / Istrry / Ected / Irable / Ressei / Incexp / Sting / Iponsinten / Ousered / Iaght / Const / Reaiv / Essed / Lessen / Ntscou / Ntenments / Ative / Appea / Estng / Overtions / Canmm / Fectill / Atedconte / Nsiffect / Expeter / Distr / Lanou / Rable / Lters / Hininter / Ather / Emenions / Fectntrions / Charse / Stachan / Ersiden / Peende / Xeessi / Ournten / Hinindi / Ntain / Ntain / Egfect / Elidin / Constin / Otist / Forions / Contors / Greected / Ident / Exnten / Ratio / Linbetter / Angentstions / Conte / Ntuggre / Itioiden / Rements / Haround / Arrins / Catmen / Ption / Taincompl / Contr / Nesount / Tureef / Edids / Horecti / Eechan / Ousction / Menust / Fectouslect / Stinem / Tivcompl / Iniident / Ityectio / Psjapr / Rnnatio / Ningentio / Itarsdis / Ffine / Undrtain / Stinwe / Conribut / Iouscontr / Sting / Nding / Milappe / Ffressi / Creconc /
i originally looked into this, To see if i could create a Catalogue of All The Syllables used in The English Language, That i could Then use to Assemble A Definitive Index for Anguish Languish Translations; Which i would then use to Devise a New UnCode based on Anguish Languish, CDB, Bennettian Poetry & Some Original Idea.
While this Examination seems to Demonstrate that The Total Number of Syllables is Manageable; It didn't really find them The Way i was hoping it would.
The Number of English Phonemes is around ( ? ) 42;
i haven't been able find An Unabridged Listing of All Syllables that Represent those Unique Sound Nibblets that i need to use inside a program to search for; And Replace with Alternative Words, Symbols or Change their Visual Structure.
In The Course of Creating A Scratch Program to Find these Syllables & Later Make Convincing Neologisms;
i first Wrote a Program to find The Most Commonly Used 2, 3, 4 & 5 Character Sets.
'in' is The most commonly used 2 Characters in The English Language !
Followed by 'ed', 'en', 'on', 'er', 'es', 'te', 'nt', 'an', 'co', 'de' & 're'.
There were only 427 two Character Sets Found;
And of those, 268 occurred 10 times or more in The Searched Text of About 6000 Words,
And 80 that occurred 100 times or more.
With 'in' Occurring 710 Times.
'ie' occurred nearly 4 times more often than 'ei'.
'ae' occurred 3 Times, 'ea' occurred 240 Times.
'oe'; 17 Times, 'eo'; 9 Times.
'ia'; 88 Times, 'ai'; 134 Times.
'er'; 492 Times, 're'; 367 Times.
The Most Common Three Character Set is 'ing', with 275 Occurrences.
There were only 10 Sets that Occurred more than 100 times.
'ion', 'ent', 'tio', 'con', 'ted', 'ter', 'nce', 'ate', & 'ati'.
There were 653 Sets with 10 or more Occurrences,
from a Total Number of Sets of 2642.
The Most Common Four Character Set was 'tion'; with 151 Occurrences,
From a Total of 5981 Sets.
Only 230 Four Character Sets occurred 10 or more Times.
There were 6953 Five Character Sets; 46 Occurred 10 or more times.
The Most Popular being 'ation', with 69 Occurrences.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
i'd been trying to come up with a New Technique for Creating 'Convincing' Neologisms for some time, without much success.
This latest method uses These Most Commonly Occurring Character Sets to Provide The Reader with 'Familiar' Character Sets that Words are Built From.
The Most Commonly Used Sets were Taken from Each Listing.
- - -
How to Use Neologisms
There are essentially two kinds of Neologisms;
Those that The Reader should be able to discern their meaning from by Examining Their Construction & Context;
And those that Require Substantially More Effort to Figure out.
This List concerns us with The Latter.
Neologisms may be very useful when you want to use a Word, or Set of Words, that Gently Suggest some Meaning, Without Actually Meaning anything.
e.g.;
Pick A Class of Phenomena;
Such as Political Philosophies;
And Exchange All Such Labels to One or Two Neologisms.
This allows that Reader to avoid being entrenched with PreConceived Philosophical or Political Ideologies and simple Define These New Terms however they'd like;
Either Favorably or UnFavorably when Considering The Story's Speaker or Narrator's Exposition.
Henry had been raised as a Fanatical Oapendian and retained many of Their Dogmas after converting to Tivoeanism at The Urging of his second Wife.
This wasn't hard for him to do, as His Father was secretly a Shedefearean, which was The Source Theology of Its Fractional Sects; Tasseatism, Tivoeansim, Ributism & The Marmots of Oarious.
A Random Neologism might also be used as an Adjective.
The Dress was a Wonderful shade of Ument with Flecks of Bright Stingbor.
He often wore is Ilexic Shoes with His Favorite Uncle's Avevely Bowler.
Dr. Ontimar deftly handled The Dedlish Clamp when attaching Mrs. Stituso's Ressei Glands.
Selected Neologisms
Muvirea
Oveblesing
Theating
Rableks
Scument
Ontimar
Undmand
Enerathe
Dattyslar
Leacolompan
Ternath
Courtra
Suhrist
Tyconse
Dedlish
Genether
Temptomple
Stituso
Dinghan
Compaue
Exprected
Renigea
Vepihar
Eadollow
Piingho
Tocounce
Hangai
Rielan
Ually
Uence
Oneun
Ratiepend
Abirect
Misaw
Racive
Joage
Tasseat
Ribut
Favent
Bient
Egowove
Oarious
Gohtande
Piortun
Ortdea
Ighbo
Ryont
Ompli
Ournter
Arilea
Matlar
Oundud
Racturenatio
Uiighring
Indiatte
Ableab
Ideniden
Yeive
Knokessed
Atteother
Entio
Spative
Natio
Carimp
Olatio
Gerption
Appea
Uglar
Essiden
Ather
Ureot
Irable
Iaght
Lanou
Xeessi
Haround
Edids
Horecti
Menust
Milappe
All Generated Neologisms
Ctsin / Essiedit / Imprcou / Tures / Icate / Ghdisp / Scrib / Ntacco / Stedca / Ppxtpose / Hangai / Oapend / Catsse / Ssellow / Iofully / Istrdin / Ncesgene / Therdre / Rielan / Suxperi / Confnin / Concomm / Ually / Araffec / Uence / Eratking / Sccompl / Arrie / Ribucount / Ntenected / Telytend / Ttontr / Ption / Rivesp / Tivoe / Convore / Heavath / Latment / Alknlea / Oneun / Tinters / Noatten / Fulxc / Rtaibount / Sedjelat / Raatter / Ratiepend / Chris / Abirect / Misaw / Ighpende / Misspre / Prhonor / Racive / Mentpend / Ntswn / Struompan / Lleonor / Ecteressi / Cross / Racte / Shedefear / Joage / Restinati / Ienautho / Breaast / Tiended / Glicfor / Entness / Natiexc / Leaclaim / Uadaomm / Aring / Nnemp / Fectchin / Faifdisc / Thers / Ssedef / Bosted / Tasseat / Turearing / Angdeli / Stitu / Arrat / Unter / Ribut / Arititu / Nstinted / Advan / Favent / Hange / Istin / Bient / Nytur / Tivnter / Ustsider / Arirect / Andsated / Uence / Heart / Derabl / Psures / Andett / Deater / Advan / Egowove / Inaiove / Epend / Mpgrand / Press / Ristfo / Oarious / Essed / Dress / Batment / Angdg / Modeles / Descward / Everxpe / Tment / Nsist / Resse / Inter / Catllect / Ritmenfect / Gohtande / Aring / Dengemen / Pptent / Piortun / Consi / Blust / Delinstru / Oustend / Ortdea / Natured / Riscu / Ininbrea / Zette / Evath / Kingies / Acaster / Tempt / Ighbo / Tened / Lonress / Ntiose / Idenocacc / Renning / Ryont / Sideag / Cross / Rrokconfe / Ssese / Ompli / Amnstieighb / Adbor / Avevely / Hinntere / Concdiffe / Istin / Veredit / Tivevely / Leended / Sideisti / Ilexic / Consapp / Weded / Dance / Japrove / Weioadmir / Grascove / Lessso / Exinter / Sionined / Assever / Aring / Rrices / Ortun / Landnstru / Ournter / Encou / Zetrdr / Arilea / Ractend / Restrib / Ssing / Tlmuistr / Buemplo / Endeisc / Eredcompl / Onstere / Omplmis / Risau / Clusi / Ieatte / Tancfully / Seque / Isctitu / Monerate / Ftute / Disco / Edeme / Mploy / Altten / Fecti / Reate / Hoccxperi / Ontind / Enerenc / Ainedi / Stinghbor / Ument / Aineinten / Opinst / Cecal / Imate / Fortu / Tenustr / Ksratiommun / Impol / Ardered / Inten / Iseer / Expomm / Intact / Teuieas / Rsghpress / Dentnger / Ratio / Ceptexccontr / Ctioratio / Tinct / Earfodesir / Ponuely / Itioje / Enddisco / Affec / Enterlea / Appeaminst / Ibually / Dentease / Diffetly / Ininglend / Ityende / Ighboiona / Velyllhed / Muvirea / Indgoained / Stinglleught / Commelat / Ntainstin / Iforteate / Missiepend / Teremisdesir / Icatintion / Atteexp / Mansteje / Ddssirtain / Antdirec / Oveblesing / Onveppire / Esseexce / Ntedgooc / Tractur / Theating / Tiyinghange / Rableks / Sequelow / Scument / Ptnstru / Mpresran / Ncludmar / Ilimoimate / Endedct / Nsttend / Redcorollow / Ritconfe / Ontuntonsid / Monltatt / Ghtercover / Generco / Tenommious / Creaction / Ontimar / Larheaexp / Tentiditio / Racthea / Breaavor / Evaionce / Xpresntent / Scendip / Therksunter / Zesingility / Eneratci / Undmand / Conppshed / Spssesta / Strucica / Utioerate / Essstant / Enerathe / Erinwnnds / Cultistr / Ughtorini / Nstiument / Rtinesear / Tinctdg / Dstiesell / Apessiint / Dattyslar / Leacolompan / Nterents / Ertntent / Admises / Ernssio / Sistcla / Ainecre / Feloside / Ngenstan / Afhararch / Lleolard / Umrmhor / Ternath / Discofecti / Instioun / Amehear / Rlakter / Courtra / Nervent / Lighigini / Oneathe / Mplional / Arnding / Excegssing / Ininxpres / Ediandisclaim / Concands / Intecomme / Ntionreate / Cikintitu / Indientl / Edatter / Zestitu / Tribnish / Ticsswn / Nattrib / Ancesas / Enceowging / Inatiug / Racavelish / Onveain / Ptnfjarit / Foremsid / Maountio / Tuexpre / Areadmini / Wnrcratio / Ortuncr / Inesvoarr / Yesseslu / Suhrist / Ustririn / Rabltance / Tterring / Everlle / Oreboighracte / Compthe / Ngerses / Tyconse / Afterse / Ssesdesi / Secatghter / Erithepre / Oofrpeusion / Llyured / Ectities / Wsative / Ckmentai / Icalnin / Greateious / Ctitlykeint / Dedlish / Temptomple / Genether / Viianplain / Chitions / Ependemplo / Inedchris / Astecar / Eighblan / Siderci / Cknyotion / Icantiinter / Expfllect / Stanvely / Missiarge / Desircom / Msrrising / Areeyfio / Cesactee / Stituso / Conture / Milpseighb / Larrect / Istrimate / Cclongil / Thement / Omedesir / Dinghan / Atterfecti / Junstru / Ionsistr / Issioces / Compaue / Asessed / Eredter / Mbdescr / Atteence / Noouurering / Grandry / Ceptgran / Exprected / Sionvobl / Ssssding / Destsses / Natelectiv / Contiencatio / Tenedatten / Evconfendscrib / Omeangif / Ndedunepend / Strtinmain / Nfption / Intefang / Renigea / Denarrie / Aveeight / Hristft / Thersreate / Theertai / Tocounce / Contkin / Orensttu / Gelleontetenti / Emeinati / Excemploy / Todrcult / Amcultterna / Nsecross / Losesene / Grandiste / Piingho / Fuainlea / Dinands / Meconti / Ssingdl / Eateaieadreate / Oyibtrlity / Overinc / Ruchhrist / Mbentio / Artrable / Eadollow / Adlingativ / Scfinaf / Thersere / Baappro / Xtnceseenst / Edicctatio / Rieninable / Misappea / Ustrcomme / Vepihar / Ntsions / Endedchan
- - - - - - - Second Generation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Matlar / Rable / Oundud / Racturenatio / Itive / Fiance / Atefasere / Rtain / Tterire / Ments / Uiighring / Racount / Ribut / Leauconsi / Naticompa / Natio / Rable / Indiatte / Cttion / Tenem / Monution / Count / Etenter / Ableab / Brpsded / Nesnn / Chanlt / Essener / Hether / Ideniden / Uteell / Yeive / Knokessed / Ribut / Atteother / Inten / Inten / Indated / Entio / Spative / Natio / Gacons / Discens / Tteect / Flned / Ribut / Appea / Carimp / Olatio / Untene / Ctionge / Ringribut / Ption / Extldes / Rindistr / Ratio / Mpame / Nessratio / Dingssed / Gerption / Appea / Commlu / Eraaf / Ionkin / Trssed / Expedes / Afressi / Natio / Appea / Ntalight / Impvi / Earless / Distr / Wnture / Ribut / Horcom / Leaction / Gaected / Ement / Tainnatio / Odance / Iesxe / Ather / Ected / Taination / Fectdisc / Reatribut / Inteution / Biine / Ionsring / Contated / Conte / Nding / Natter / Triren / Contather / Eeratio / Ident / Ghtring / Uglar / Ction / Otcoun / Ectio / Inten / Unappe / Consatio / Mattpress / Essiden / Ather / Ement / Attete / Appesse / Intetribu / Rriac / Nding / Redoseption / Turust / Hantter / Lowhea / Heemen / Compl / Avchar / Ngfeconte / Ratenter / Napress / Tionatte / Oreinter / Deconf / Count / Ureot / Itioact / Comother / Pasion / Blecol / Conte / Ffect / Noiden / Ctepo / Amntatte / Indicen / Ioustribu / Angeconce / Finrtain / Iescontr / Graoo / Ather / Tingribut / Cenneely / Ustawount / Istrry / Ected / Irable / Ressei / Incexp / Sting / Iponsinten / Ousered / Iaght / Const / Reaiv / Essed / Lessen / Ntscou / Ntenments / Ative / Appea / Estng / Overtions / Canmm / Fectill / Atedconte / Nsiffect / Expeter / Distr / Lanou / Rable / Lters / Hininter / Ather / Emenions / Fectntrions / Charse / Stachan / Ersiden / Peende / Xeessi / Ournten / Hinindi / Ntain / Ntain / Egfect / Elidin / Constin / Otist / Forions / Contors / Greected / Ident / Exnten / Ratio / Linbetter / Angentstions / Conte / Ntuggre / Itioiden / Rements / Haround / Arrins / Catmen / Ption / Taincompl / Contr / Nesount / Tureef / Edids / Horecti / Eechan / Ousction / Menust / Fectouslect / Stinem / Tivcompl / Iniident / Ityectio / Psjapr / Rnnatio / Ningentio / Itarsdis / Ffine / Undrtain / Stinwe / Conribut / Iouscontr / Sting / Nding / Milappe / Ffressi / Creconc /
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)